Resect or not to resect: The role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement

European Spine Journal

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 5, 2012, Pages

  Cakir, Balkan ^a   Richter, Marcus ^b   Schmoelz, Werner ^c   Schmidt, René ^d   Reichel, Heiko ^a   Wilke, Hans Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b ST JOSEFS HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^c INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Lumbar disc replacement; Posterior longitudinal ligament; Range of motion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LUMBAR SPINE; POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT; POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT RESECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINE IMPLANT; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; ROTATION; CADAVER; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENTS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84877078737     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1193-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S (2002) Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 11:131-136
2. Cakir B, Schmidt R, Huch K, Puhl W, Richter M (2004) Sagittales Alignement und segmentale Beweglichkeit nach endoprothetischer Versorgung lumbaler Bewegungssegmente. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:159-165 (Pubitemid 38594695)
3. Dabbs VM, Dabbs LG (1990) Correlation between disc height narrowing and low-back pain. Spine 15:1366-1369
4. David T (1993) Lumbar disc prosthesis. Surgical technique, indications and clinical results in 22 patients with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Spine J 1:254-259
5. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LEA, Bae H (2003) Pro-Disc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the united states clinical trial. Spine 28:167-175
6. Hopf C, Heeckt H, Beske C (2002) Der Bandscheibenersatz mit der SB Charite-Bandscheibenendoprothese - Erfahrungen, Frühergebnisse und Feststellungen nach 35 prospektiv durchgeführten Operationen. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 140:485-491
7. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Lim MR, Tropiano P, Marnay T (2005) Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 30:1407-1411 (Pubitemid 41754864)
8. Liu J, Ebraheim NA, Haman SP, Shafiq Q, Karkare N, Biyani A, Goel VK, Woldenberg L (2006) Effect of the increase in the height of lumbar disc space on facet joint articulation area in sagittal plane. Spine 31:E198-E202
9. Mayer HM, Korge A (2002) Non-fusion technology in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: facts, questions, challenges. Eur Spine J 11:85-91
10. Olsewski JM, Schendel MJ, Wallace LJ, Ogilvie JW, Gundra CR (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging and biological changes in injured intervertebral discs under normal and increased mechanical demands. Spine 21:1945-1951 (Pubitemid 26301671)
11. Panjabi M, Henderson G, Abjornson C, Yue J (2007) Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions. Spine 32:1311-1319 (Pubitemid 46791450)
12. Panjabi M, Malcolmson G, Teng E, Tominaga Y, Henderson G, Serhan H (2007) Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions. Spine 32:959-966 (Pubitemid 46646766)
13. Phillips FM, Reuben J, Wetzel FT (2002) Intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion. An experimental rabbit model. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:289-294 (Pubitemid 34257700)
14. Punt IM, Visser VM, van Rhijn LW, Kurtz SM, Antonis J, Schurink GWH, van Ooij A (2008) Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J 17:36-43 (Pubitemid 351187675)
15. Shim CS, Lee SH, Shin HD, Kang HS, Choi WC, Jung B, Choi G, Ahn Y, Lee S, Lee HY (2007) CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up. Spine 32:1012-1018 (Pubitemid 46642559)
16. Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW (1998) Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine 23:1550-1558 (Pubitemid 28459959)
17. Siepe CJ, Korge A, Grochulla F, Mehren C, Mayer HM (2008) Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations. Eur Spine J 17:44-56
18. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Mayer M (2002) Spine arthroplasty: a historical review. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):65-84
19. Weißkopf M, Ohnsorge JAK, Martini F, Niethard FU, Birnbaum K (2008) Influence of inlay height on motion characteristics of lumbar segments in total disc replacement. Z Orthop Unfall 146:452-457
20. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd edn. J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia
21. Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L (1998) Testing criteria for spinal implants-recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J 7:148-154 (Pubitemid 28223601)