Disc replacement with the SB Charité endoposthesis - Experience, preliminary results and comments after 35 prospectively performed operations;Der bandscheibenersatz mit der SB Charité-bandscheibenendoprothese - Erfahrungen, frühergebnisse und feststellungen nach 35 prospektiv durchgeführten operationen

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete

Volumn 140, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 485-491

  Hopf, C ^a   Heeckt, H ^a   Beske, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial disc; Disc degeneration; Disc replacement; SB Charit endoprosthesis

Indexed keywords

OPIATE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ENDOPROSTHESIS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LORDOSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; REOPERATION; SPINAL DISEASES; SPONDYLITIS, ANKYLOSING;

EID: 0036742367     PISSN: 00443220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-34000     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Büttner-Janz K, Schellnack K, Zippel H. Intervertebral lumbar endoprosthesis SB Charité experimental studies preliminary results Z Orthop. 1987; 125: 1-6
2. Büttner-Janz K, Zippel H, Schellnack K. Biomechanics of the SB Charité lumbar intervertebral disc endoprosthesis. Int Orthop 1989; 13: 173-176
3. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follw-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996; 21 (8): 995-1000
4. David T. Lumbar disk prosthesis. Eur Spine J 1993; 1: 254-259
5. Deyo RA. Low-back pain. Scientific American 1998; 279: 28-33
6. Enker P, Steffee A, McMillin C, Keppler L, Biscup R, Miller S. Artificial disk replacement. Spine 1993; 18: 1061-1070
7. Eysel P, Zöllner J, Heine J. Die künstliche Bandscheibe. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2000; 97, 46: 3092-3096
8. Fernstroem U. Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and painful disc. Acta Chir Scand 1966; 355: 154-159
9. Freund A. Jung im Rücken. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 2001; 270:13
10. Frymoyer JW, Krag MH. The unstable spine. Dunshier S, Schmiden B, Frymoyer HH, Hahn J. Grunde Strattin Inc., Orlando, 1986
11. Gower WE, Pedrini V. Age-related variations in protein-polysaccharides from human nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and costal cartilage. J Bone Jt Surg 1969; 51A: 1154-1160
12. Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Büttner-Janz K, LeMaire JP, Zeegers WS. A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the Link SB Charité intervertebral prosthesis. The initial experience. Spine 1994; 9: 1842-1849
13. Kienapfel H, Hinrichs F. Das pauschlierte Entgeltsystem auf der Basis der Australian Refind Diagnosis Related Groups (AR-DRG's) für orthopäidische und unfallchirurgische Kliniken. Z Orthop 2001; 139: M2-M10
14. Krämer J. Bandscheibenbedingte Erkrankungen. Stuttgart, New York: G. Thieme, 1994: 288-295
15. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 1988; 13: 375-377
16. Marnay T. Prosthesis for intervertebral discs and instruments for implanting it. It. US Patent 5.314477, 24, May 1994
17. Marnay T. Prodisc Prosthesis - 2 year follow-up. Vortrag, Orlando: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1995
18. Marnay T. Lumbar Disck arthroplasty: 8-10 years using Titanium plates with a polyethylene inlay component. Poster No. PE 307, San Francisco: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 28.2.-4.3.2001, 2001
19. Miltner O, Wirtz DC, Siebert CH. Die Kräftigung der Lumbalextensoren (MedX) - die Therapie beim chronischen Rückenschmerz - eine Übersicht und Metaanalyse. Z Orthop 2001; 139: 287-293
20. Niethard FU. DRGs: Die Orthopädie zwischen Winkelmesser und "Casemix". Z Orthop 2001; 139: 277-278
21. Ray CD. The artificial disc. Introduction, history, and socioeconomics. Weinstein JN. Clinical efficiacy and outcome in the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. New York: Raven Press, 1992: 205-225
22. Ray CD, Schönmayr R, Kavanagh SA, Assell R. Prosthetic disc nucleus implants. Rivista Neuroradiologica 1999; 12 (Suppl 1): 157-162
23. Schären S, Dick W. Langstreckige Fusionen der degenerativen Lendenwirbelsäule. Orthop Praxis 2001; 37, 3: 133-140
24. Schmid M, Hopf C. Notwendige Schritte zur Einführung des AR-DRG-Systems. Z Orthop 2001; 139: 279-286
25. Schönmayr R, Busch C, Lotz C, Lotz-Metz G. Prosthetic disc nucleus implants: the Wiesbaden feasibility study. 2 years follw-up in ten patients. Riv Neuroradiol 1999; 2 (Suppl 1): 163-170
26. Schulitz K-P, Abel R, Schöppe K, Assheuer J. Der Bandscheibenvorfall. Dt Ärtztebl 1999; 96A (Heft 9): 548-552
27. Scott AH, Harrison DJ. Increasing age does not affect good outcome after lumbar disc replacement. Inter Orthop (Sicot) 2000; 24: 50-53
28. White AA, Panjabi M. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Philadelphia, JB. Lippincott, 1978: 105
29. Zeegers WS. Die Link - Bandscheibenprothese. Vortrag gehalten während des Forum Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Arosa, 22.1.-24.1.1999
30. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, Verhaegen MJ. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999; 8: 210-217
31. Zöllner J, Rompe J-D, Eysel P. Die biomechanischen Eigenschaften von künstlichen Implantaten der lumbalen Bandscheibe. Z Orthop 2000; 138: 459-463