A randomized controlled trial of Cognitive Sensory Motor Training Therapy on the recovery of arm function in acute stroke patients

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1096-1104

  Chanubol, Ratanapat ^a   Wongphaet, Parit ^b   Chavanich, Napapit ^b   Werner, Cordula ^c   Hesse, Stefan ^c   Bardeleben, Anita ^c   Merholz, Jan ^d  

^a PRASAT NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Thailand)

^b MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^d Department of Neurological Rehabilitation ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PARESIS; PROPRIOCEPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THAILAND;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; ARM; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PARESIS; PROPRIOCEPTION; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; THAILAND;

EID: 84877054798     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215512444631     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. This study was supported by a grant from the foundation of Ramathibodi Hospital, which had no influence on the methodology or study outcome [grant number ID 01-46-07].
2. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994; 25: 1181–1188.
3. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 394–398.
4. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 521–524.
5. Sunderland A, Fletcher D, Bradley L, Tinson D, Hewer RL, Wade DT. Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one year follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 856–858.
6. Rabadi MH. Review of the randomized clinical stroke rehabilitation trials in 2009. Med Sci Monit 2011; 17: RA 25–43.
7. French B, Thomas LH, Leathley MJ, et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (4): CD006073.
8. Perfetti C. Der aufbau der uegungen. In: PerfettiC,(ed. ) Der hemiplegische patient cognitive-therapeutische uegungen, first edition. Munich: Pflaum, 1997, pp. 71–106.
9. Birbamer G, Beise U. Das Gehirn denkt nicht in musklekontraktionen. Ars Medici 2001; 6: 282–285.
10. Wongphaet P, Butrach W, Sangkrai S, Jitpraphai C. Improved function of hemiplegic upper extremity after cognitive sensory motor training in chronic stroke and traumatic brain injury patients: Preliminary reports of a case series. J Thai Med Assoc 2003; 86: 579–584.
11. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981; 4: 483–492.
12. Parry RH, Lincoln NB, Vass CD. Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 187–198.
13. Wongphaet P, Sinlapawonsa T, Butrach W, Chira-Adisai W, Laothamatas J, Jitpraphai C. Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of brain plasticity after cognitive sensory motor training in a stroke patient. Neurol J Thailand 2005; 5: 123–126.
14. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Johnson G. Arm rehabilitation measurement, first edition. Baden Baden: Deutscher Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2005, pp. 17–108.
15. Jansa J, Pogacnik T, Gompertz P. An evaluation of the Extended Barthel Index with acute ischemic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004; 18: 37–41.
16. Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The intra-and inter-rater reliability of the action research arm test: A practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 14–19.
17. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: A multicentre study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 404–411.
18. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 751–755.
19. Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1693–1700.
20. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 2181–2186.
21. Chen SY, Winstein CS. A systematic review of voluntary arm recovery in hemiparetic stroke critical predictors for meaningful outcomes using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009; 33: 2–13.
22. Mead GE, Lewis SC, Wardlaw JM, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. How well does the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification predict the site and size of the infarct on brain imaging? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 558–562.
23. Herrmann C. International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res 1997; 42: 17–41.
24. Kasner SE, Chalela JA, Luciano JM, et al. Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH stroke scale score from medical records. Stroke 1999; 30: 1534–1537.