An Evaluation of the Extended Barthel Index with Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 37-41

  Janša, Jelka ^a   Pogačnik, Tomaž ^b   Gompertz, Patrick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTRE LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

ADL; Assessment; Extended Barthel Index; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; EXTENDED BARTHEL INDEX; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUGL MEYER MOTOR IMPAIRMENT SCALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; RIVERMEAD BEHAVIORAL MEMORY TEST; SELF EVALUATION; SPEECH THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1342310557     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0888439003262287     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61-3.
2. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:64-7.
3. Clark W, Hourihane JM. Clinical stroke scales. Handbook of neurologic rating scales. New York: Demos Vermande; 1997.
4. Shah S. In praise of the biometrics qualities of the Barthel index. Physiotherapy 1994;80:769-71.
5. Kelly-Hayes M, Robertson JT, Broderick JP, et al. The American heart association stroke outcome classification: executive summary. Stroke 1998;97:1274-80.
6. Dombovy M. Rehabilitation and the course of recovery after stroke. In: Whisnant JP, ed. Stroke: populations, cohorts, and clinical trials. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993:218-37.
7. Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, et al. The functional independence measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil 1995;17:53-62.
8. Prosiegel M, Bottger S, Schenk T. Der Erwertiertr Barthel Index (EBI)-eine neue Skala zur Erfassung von Fahigkeitsstorungen bei neurologischen patieneten. Neurol Rehabil 1996;1:7-13.
9. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1226-32.
10. Marolf MV, Vaney C, Prosiegel M, Koning N. Evaluation of disability in multiple sclerosis patients: a comparative study of the functional independence measure, the extended Barthel index and the expanded disability status scale. Clin Rehabil 1996;10:309-13.
11. Prosiegel M, Pulsone G. Assessment of disability and handicap. In: Ketealaer P, Prosiegel M, Battaglia M, Messmer Uccelli M, eds. A problem-oriented approach to multiple sclerosis. Leuven, The Netherlands: Acco; 1997:21-34.
12. Fuhrer MJ. Conference report: an agenda for medical rehabilitation outcomes research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995;74:243-8.
13. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post stroke hemiplegic patient. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13-31.
14. Chae J, Johnston M, Kim H, Zorowitz R. Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995;74:218-23.
15. Wilson BA. Clinical management of memory problems. London: Chapman & Hall; 1992.
16. Statistica for Windows 5.0 Computer program. Oklahoma: StatSoft Inc; 1995.
17. Breakwell GM, Hamond S, Sige-Schaw C. Research methods in psychology. London: Sage; 1995.
18. Jitapunkul S. Summary report for Prof. Ebrahim and Dr. Barer. London: Royal college of Physicians of London and British Geriatric Society; 1991.
19. Jitapunkul S, Kamolratanakul P, Ebrahim S. The meaning of activities of daily living in a Thai elderly population: development of a new index. Age Ageing 1994;23:97-101.
20. Stineman M, Shea J, Jette A, Tassoni C. The functional independence measure: test of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 30 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101-8.