Item banks for alcohol use from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): Use, consequences, and expectancies

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 130, Issue 1-3, 2013, Pages 167-177

  Pilkonis, Paul A ^a   Yu, Lan ^a   Colditz, Jason ^a   Dodds, Nathan ^a   Johnston, Kelly L ^a   Maihoefer, Catherine ^a   Stover, Angela M ^a   Daley, Dennis C ^a   McCarty, Dennis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol consequences; Alcohol expectancies; Alcohol use; Item response theory; Measurement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG ABUSE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; THEORY;

ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SELF REPORT; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS;

EID: 84877029428     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aarons G.A., Goldman M.S., Greenbaum P.E., Coovert M.D. Alcohol expectancies: integrating cognitive science and psychometric approaches. Addict. Behav. 2003, 28:947-961.
2. Angoff W.H. Scales, norms and equivalent scores. Educational Measurement 1971, American Council on Education, Washington, DC. 2nd ed. R.L. Thorndike (Ed.).
3. Berzon R., Patrick D., Guyatt G., Conley J.M. Intellectual property considerations in the development and use of HRQL measures for clinical trial research. Qual. Life Res. 1994, 3:273-277.
4. Buysse D., Yu L., Moul D.E., Germain A., Stover A., Dodds N.E., Johnston K.L., Shablesky-Cade M.A., Pilkonis P.A. Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Slee 2010, 33.
5. Castel L.D., Williams K.A., Bosworth H.B., Eisen S.V., Hahn E.A., Irwin D.E., Kelly M.A.R., Morse J., Stover A., DeWalt D.A., DeVellis R.F. Content validity in the PROMIS social health domain: a qualitative analysis of focus group data. Qual. Life Res. 2008, 17:737-749.
6. Cella D., Gershon R., Lai J.S., Choi S. The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual. Life Res. 2007, 16:133-144.
7. Cella D., Riley W., Stone A., Rothrock N., Reeve B.B., Yount S., Amtmann D., Bode R., Buysse D., Choi S., Cook K., DeVellis R., DeWalt D., Fries J.F., Gershon R., Hahn E.A., Lai J.S., Pilkonis P., Revicki D., Rose M., Weinfurt K., Hays R. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item bank: 2005-2008. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2010, 63:1179-1194.
8. Choi S. Firestar: computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 2009, 33:644-645.
9. Choi S.W., Reise S.P., Pilkonis P.A., Hays R.D., Cella D. Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms. Qual. Life Res. 2010, 19:125-136.
10. DeWalt D.A., Rothrock N., Yount S., Stone A.A. Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review. Med. Care 2007, 45:S12-S21. On behalf of the PROMIS Cooperative Group.
11. Fries J.F., Cella D., Rose M., Krishnan E., Bruce B. Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. J. Rheumatol. 2009, 36:2061-2066.
12. Green B.A., Ahmed A.O., Marcus D.K., Walters G.D. The latent structure of alcohol use pathology in an epidemiological sample. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2011, 45:225-233.
13. ® for addiction. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011, 119:229-234.
14. Horn J.L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1965, 30:179-185.
15. Jones B.T., Corbin W., Fromme K. A review of expectancy theory and alcohol consumption. Addiction 2001, 96:57-72.
16. Kelly M.A., Morse J.Q., Stover A., Hofkens T., Huisman E., Shulman S., Eisen S.V., Becker S.J., Weinfurt K., Boland E., Pilkonis P.A. Describing depression: congruence between patient experiences and clinical assessments. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2011, 50:46-66.
17. Klem M.L., Saghafi E., Abromitis R., Stover A., Dew M.A., Pilkonis P.A. Building PROMIS item banks: librarians as co-investigators. Qual. Life Res. 2009, 18:881-888.
18. Kolen M.J., Brennan R.L. Test Equating, Scaling and Linking: Methods and Practices 2004, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
19. Krueger R.F., Nichol P.E., Hicks B.M., Markon K.E., Patrick C.J., Iacono W.G., McGue M. Using latent trait modeling to conceptualize an alcohol problems continuum. Psychol. Assess. 2004, 16:107-119.
20. Langenbucher J.W., Labouvie E., Martin C.S., Sanjuan P.M., Bavly L., Kirisci L., Chung T. An application of item response theory analysis to alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine criteria in DSM-IV. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2004, 113:72-80.
21. Linn R.L. Linking results of distinct assessments. Appl. Measure. Educ. 1993, 6:83-102.
22. Lord F.M. Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. 1980, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
23. Martin C.S., Chung T., Kirisci L., Langenbucher J.W. Item response theory analysis of diagnostic citeria for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in adolescents: implications for DSM-V. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2006, 115:807-814.
24. Muthén B. Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional?. Addiction 2006, 101:6-16.
25. Muthén L.K., Muthén B. Mplus User's Guide 2006, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA. 4th ed.
26. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Task Force on Recommended Alcohol Questions: National Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Recommended Set of Alcohol Consumption Questions: October 15-16 2003, (accessed 04.11.11). http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/Resources/ResearchResources/TaskForce.htm.
27. Orlando M., Thissen D. Further investigation of the performance of the S-X2: an item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 2003, 27:289-298.
28. Pabst A., Baumeister S.E., Kraus L. Alcohol-expectancy dimensions and alcohol consumption at different ages in the general population. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 2009, 71:46-53.
29. Pilkonis P.A., Choi S.W., Reise S.P., Stover A.M., Riley W.T., Cella D. Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system: depression, anxiety, anger. Assessment 2011, 18:263-283.
30. Reeve B.B., Hays R.D., Bjorner J.B., Cook K.F., Crane P.K., Teresi J.A., Thissen D., Revicki D.A., Weiss D.J., Hambleton R.K., Liu H., Gershon R., Reise S.P., Cella D. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med. Care 2007, 45:S22-S31. PROMIS Cooperative Group.
31. Reise S.P., Moore T.M., Haviland M.G. Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. J. Pers. Assess. 2010, 92:544-559.
32. Revicki D., Chen W., Harnam N., Cook K., Amtmann D., Callahan L.F., Jensen M.P., Keefe F.J. Development and psychometric analysis of the PROMIS pain behavior item bank. Pain 2009, 146:158-169.
33. Revicki D., Schwartz C.E. Intellectual property rights and good research practice. Qual. Life Res. 2009, 18:1279-1280.
34. Saha T.D., Chou S.P., Grant B.F. Toward an alcohol use disorder continuum using item response theory: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychol. Med. 2006, 36:931-941.
35. Saha T.D., Stinson F.S., Grant B.F. The role of alcohol consumption in future classification of alcohol use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 89:82-92.
36. Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Mono 1969, 17.
37. Saunders J.B., Aasland O.G., Babor T.F., Delafuente J.R., Grant M. Development of the Alcohol-Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. Addiction 1993, 88:791-804.
38. Teresi J.A., Ocepek-Welikson K., Kleinman M., Eimicke J.P., Crane P.K., Jones R.N., Lai J.S., Choi S.W., Hays R.D., Reeve B.B., Reise S.P., Pilkonis P.A., Cella D. Analysis of differential item functioning in the depression item bank from the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS): an item response theory approach. Psychol. Sci. Q 2009, 51:148-180.
39. Thissen D., Chen W.H., Bock R.D. Multilog (version 7) 2003, Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL.
40. Thissen D., Steinberg L., Wainer H. Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. Differential Item Functioning 1993, 67-113. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. P.W. Holland, H. Wainer (Eds.).
41. Thissen D., Wainer H. Test Scoring 2001, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
42. Vik P.W., Carrello P., Nathan P.E. Hypothesized simple factor structure for the Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis. Exp. Clin. Psychopharm. 1999, 7:294-303.
43. Wilkinson G.S. The Wide Range Achievement Test: Manual 1993, Wide Range, Wilmington, DE.
44. Wilkinson G.S., Robertson G.J. WRAT4: Wide Range Achievement Test Professional Manual 2006, Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL.
45. Yen W.M. Effects of local item dependence on the fit and equation performance of the three-parameter logistic model. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1984, 2:125-145.
46. Zumbo B.D. A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF): Logistic Regression Modeling as a Unitary Framework for Binary and Likert-type (Ordinal) Item Scores 1999, Directorate of Human Resources Research and Education, Department of National Defense, Ottawa, ON.