A holistic approach to control process safety risks: Possible ways forward

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 117, Issue , 2013, Pages 21-29

  Pasman, H J ^a   Knegtering, B ^b   Rogers, W J ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^b HONEYWELL   (United States)

Author keywords

Holistic approach; Human factors; Process safety; Resilience engineering; Risk control; Safety indicators

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; BENCHMARKING; HUMAN ENGINEERING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

HOLISTIC APPROACH; PROCESS SAFETY; RESILIENCE ENGINEERINGS; RISK CONTROLS; SAFETY INDICATOR;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 84876969460     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.010     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Barab, J., Learning from industry mistakes, key note speech for the national petro-chemical and refiners association. In: National safety conference San Antonio. Texas, May 19, 2010; 〈http://www.osha.gov/pls/ oshaweb/owadisp.show-document?p-table=SPEECHES&p-id=2218âŒ
2. B Knegtering, and HJ. Pasman Safety of the process industries in the 21st century: a changing need of process safety management for a changing industry Journal of Loss Prevention in the ProcessIndustries 22 2009 162 168
3. Report to the president of the national commission on the BP deepwater horizon oil spill and offshore drilling. January 2011; p. 224; for failing communication and inadequate decision making processes see also p. 122 and following, isbn:978-0-16-087371-3, 〈http://www. oilspillcommission.gov/final-reportâŒ.
4. KE Weick, and KM. Sutcliffe Managing the unexpected, resilient performance in an age of uncertainty 2nd ed. 2007 John Wiley & Sons Jossey-Bass
5. E Hollnagel, DA Woods, and NG. Leveson Resilience engineering 2006 Concepts and Precepts, Ashgate
6. CCPS/AIChE, process safety leading and lagging metrics, center for chemical process safety - AIChE, initial release, New York, 20 December; 2007, and guidelines for risk based process safety, isbn:978-0-470-16569-0, 〈http://www.aiche.org/ccps/âŒ.
7. Leveson NG, Dulac N. Safety and risk-driven design in complex systems-of-systems. In: First space exploration conference: continuing the voyage of discovery. Orlando, FL; USA; 30 Jan.-1 Feb. 2005. p. 1-25. 2005.
8. Hollnagel E, Woods DA, Leveson N. About resilience engineering. International symposium on resilience engineering. Söderköping, Sweden; October 20-25; 2004
9. R Pitblado, B Bain, A Falck, Kj Litland, and C. Spitzenberger Frequency data and modification factors used in QRA studies Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 24 2011 249 258
10. E. Hollnagel The changing nature of risks Ergonomics Australia Journal 22 1-2 2008 33 46
11. V. Venkatasubramanian Systemic failures: challenges and opportunities in risk management in complex systems AIChE Journal 57 1 2011 2 9
12. NG. Leveson Engineering a safer world, systems thinking applied to safety 2011 The MIT Press 608 pp., ISBN-10:0-262-01662-1 ISBN-13:978-0-262-01662-9
13. R Steen, and T. Aven A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering Safety Science 49 2011 292 297
14. T. Aven On how to define, understand and describe risk Reliability Engineering and System Safety 95 2010 623 631
15. LTT Dinh, HJ Pasman, X Gao, and MS. Mannan Resilience engineering of industrial processes: principles and contributing factors Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 25 2011 233 241
16. V Venkatasubramanian, R Rengaswamy, SN Kavuri, and K. Yin A review of process fault detection and diagnosis, Part I: Quantitative model based methods. Computers and Chemical Engineering 2003; 27, 293-311; Part II: Qualitative models and search strategies. Computers and Chemical Engineering 2003; 27, 312-326; Part III: Process history based methods Computers and Chemical Engineering 27 2003 327 346
17. BJM Ale, LJ Bellamy, R van der Boom, J Cooper, RM Cooke, and LHJ Goossens Further development of a causal model for air transport safety (CATS): building the mathematical heart Reliability Engineering and System Safety 94 2009 1433 1441
18. JE Vinnem, R Bye, BA Gran, T Kongsvik, OM Nyheim, and EH Okstad Risk modelling of maintenance work on major process equipment on offshore petroleum installations Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 25 2012 274 292
19. V De Dianous, and C. Fiévez ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance Journal of Hazardous Materials 130 2006 220 233
20. N Khakzad, F Khan, and P. Amyotte Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96 2011 925 932
21. Pasman, HJ, Rogers, WJ., Bayesian networks make LOPA more effective, QRA more transparent and flexible, and thus safety more definable!, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2012this issue wherever this occurs in the list and, if appropriate, in the text. - >; In Press, Corrected Proof, doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2012.07.016.
22. F Guldenmund, A Hale, L Goossens, J Betten, and N-J. Duijm The development of an audit technique to assess the quality of safety barrier management Journal of Hazardous Materials 130 2006 234 241
23. NW Hurst, LJ Bellamy, TAW Geyer, and JA. Astley A classification scheme for pipework failures to include human and sociotechnical errors and their contribution to pipework failure frequencies Journal of Hazardous Materials 26 2 1991 159 186
24. Knegtering, B., Safety Lifecycle Management in the Process Industries, PhD Thesis, TechnischeUniversiteit Eindhoven; 2002.
25. Knegtering B., Safety lifecycle management in the process industries. PhD thesis. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; 2002.
26. AA. Brombacher Maturity Index on Reliability, MIR: covering non-technical aspects of IEC 61508 reliability certification Reliability Engineering and System Safety 66 1999 109 120