Coronary angiography: Is it time to reassess?

Circulation

Volumn 127, Issue 17, 2013, Pages 1760-1762

  Anderson, R David ^a   Pepine, Carl J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography; Cardiovascular disease; Diagnosis; Editorials; Imaging; Stenosis

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOSCOPY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84876964971     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002566     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Marcus ML, Skorton DJ, Johnson M.R., Collins SM, Harrison DG, Kerber RE Visual estimates of percent diameter stenosis: "a battered gold standard.". J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:882-885.
2. Feldman RL, Nichols WW, Pepine C.J., Conti CR Hemodynamic significance of the length of a coronary arterial narrowing. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41:865-871.
3. Feldman RL, Nichols WW, Pepine C.J., Conetta DA, Conti CR The coronary hemodynamics of left main and branch coronary stenoses: the effects of reduction in stenosis diameter, stenosis length, and number of stenoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;77:377-388.
4. Feldman RL, Nichols WW, Pepine C.J., Conti CR Hemodynamic effects of long and multiple coronary arterial narrowings. Chest. 1978;74:280-285.
5. Karayannacos PE, Talukder N, Nerem R.M., Roshon S., Vasko JS The role of multiple noncritical arterial stenoses in the pathogenesis of ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;73:458-469.
6. Sabbah HN, Stein PD Hemodynamics of multiple versus single 50 percent coronary arterial stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 1982;50:276-280.
7. Uren NG, Melin JA, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, Baudhuin T., Camici PG Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1782-1788.
8. Goldberg RK, Kleiman NS, Minor S.T., Abukhalil J., Raizner AE Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA. Am Heart J. 1990;119:178-184.
9. Kerensky RA, Cusma JT, Kubilis P, Simon R., Bashore TM, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Holmes DR Jr, Pepine CJ, Nissen SE. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression phase I: the effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1370-1379.
10. Tuinenburg JC, Koning G, Hekking E., Zwinderman AH, Becker T, Simon R, Reiber JHC. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression phase II: the effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1380-1387.
11. Folland ED, Vogel RA, Hartigan P, Bates E.R., Beauman GJ, Fortin T, Boucher C, Parisi AF Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease: the Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. Circulation. 1994;89:2005-2014.
12. Kalbfleisch SJ, McGillem MJ, Pinto I.M., Kavanaugh KM, DeBoe SF, Mancini GB Comparison of automated quantitative coronary angi-ography with caliper measurements of percent diameter stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:1181-1184.
13. Nallamothu BK, Spertus JA, Lansky A.J., Cohen DJ, Jones PG, Kureshi F, Dehmer G.J., Drodza JP Jr, Walsh MN, Brush JE Jr, Koenig GC, Waites TF, Gantt DS, Kichura G, Chazal RA, O'Brien PK, Valentine CM, Rumsfeld JS, Reiber JHC, Elmore JG, Krumholz RA, Weaver WD, Krumholz HM. Comparison of clinical interpretation with visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice: the Assessing Angiography (A2) Project. Circulation. 2013;127:1793-1800.
14. Fleming RM, Kirkeeide RL, Smalling R.W., Gould KL Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:945-951.
15. Wolfson A. Hundreds sue Kentucky hospital over heart procedures. USA Today: The (Louisville, Ky.) Courier-Journal. February 17, 2013.
16. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar M.A., Ver Lee PN, Maccarthy PA, Van't Veer M, Pijls NH. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816-2821.
17. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F., van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrøm T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213-224.
18. De Bruyne B., Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E., Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Möbius-Winkler S, Mobius-Winckler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engström T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Jüni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991-1001.