Researching the hidden curriculum: intentional and unintended messages

Journal of Geography in Higher Education

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 192-203

  Cotton, Debby ^a   Winter, Jennie ^a   Bailey, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

controversial issues; hidden curriculum; research methods; sustainability

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; GEOGRAPHY EDUCATION; HIGHER EDUCATION; POLITICAL CHANGE; RESEARCH; SUSTAINABILITY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84876958221     PISSN: 03098265     EISSN: 14661845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2012.733684     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Ahola, S. (2000). Hidden curriculum in higher education: Something to fear or to comply to? Paper presented at the innovations in higher education conference, September 2, Helsinki
2. Anderson, T. 2001. The hidden curriculum in distance education: An updated view. Change, 33: 28-35.
3. Anderson, T. 2002. " Revealing the hidden curriculum of E-learning ". In Distance education and distributed learning, Edited by: Vrasidas, C. and Glass, G. V. 115-133. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
4. Apple, M. W. 1980. The other side of the hidden curriculum: correspondence theories and the labour process. Journal of Education, 162: 47-66.
5. Apple, M. W. 1990. Ideology and curriculum, London: Routledge.
6. Apple, M. W. and King, N. P. 1977. " What do schools teach? ". In Humanistic education, Edited by: Weller, R. H. 29-63. Berkley, CA: McCutchan.
7. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. 1974. Theories in practice, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
8. Bailey, I. 2007. Climate policy implementation: Geographical perspectives. Area, 39: 415-417.
9. Bailey, I. 2008. Geographical work at the boundaries of climate policy: A commentary and complement to Mike Hulme. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33: 420-423.
10. Ball, S. 1990. Markets, inequality and urban schooling. The Urban Review, 22: 85-100.
11. Barnett, R. 2000. Supercomplexity and the curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 25: 255-265.
12. Bloom, B. S. 1953. Thought processes in lectures and discussions. Journal of General Education, 7: 160-169.
13. Bloom, B. S. 1972. Innocence in education. School Review, 80: 333-352.
14. Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. 1976. Schooling in capitalist America, New York: Guildford Press.
15. Brandt, G. L. 1986. The realization of anti-racist teaching, London: Falmer Press.
16. Castree, N. 2006. Commentary: From neoliberalism to neoliberalisation: Consolations, confusions, and necessary illusions. Environment and Planning A, 38: 1-6.
17. Cotton, D. R. E. 2006a. Teaching controversial environmental issues: Neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48: 223-241.
18. Cotton, D. R. E. 2006b. Implementing curriculum guidance on environmental education: The importance of teachers' beliefs. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38: 67-83.
19. Cotton, D., Bailey, I., Warren, M. and Bissell, S. 2009. Revolutions and second-best solutions: Education for sustainable development in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34: 719-733.
20. Cotton, D. R. E., Warren, M. F., Maiboroda, O. and Bailey, I. 2007. Sustainable development, higher education and pedagogy: A study of lecturers' beliefs and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 13: 579-597.
21. Cotton, D. R. E. and Winter, J. 2010. " 'It's not just bits of paper and light bulbs': A review of sustainability pedagogies and their potential for use in higher education ". In Sustainability education: Perspectives and practice across higher education, Edited by: Jones, P., Selby, D. and Sterling, S. 39-54. London: Earthscan.
22. Cousin, G. 2009. Researching learning in higher education: An introduction to contemporary methods and approaches, London: Routledge.
23. Djordjevic, A. and Cotton, D. R. E. 2011. Communicating the sustainability message in higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12: 381-394.
24. Dunphy, A. and Spellman, G. 2009. Geography fieldwork, fieldwork values and learning styles. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 18: 19-28.
25. Edwards, D. and Mercer, N. 1987. Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom, London: Routledge.
26. Edwards, A. D. and Westgate, D. P. G. 1994. Investigating classroom talk, London: The Falmer Press.
27. Fuller, I., Edmondson, S., France, D., Higgitt, D. and Ratinen, I. 2006. International perspectives on the effectiveness of geography fieldwork for learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30: 89-101.
28. Giroux, H. A. 1983. Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53: 257-293.
29. Hargreaves, D. 1967. Social relations in the secondary school, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
30. Hargreaves, D. 1978. " Power and the paracurriculum ". In Power and the curriculum: Issues in curriculum studies, Edited by: Richards, C. 97-108. Driffield: Nafferton.
31. Healey, M. and Jenkins, A. 2000. Kolb's experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99: 185-195.
32. Hope, M. 2009. The importance of direct experience: A philosophical defence of fieldwork in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33: 169-182.
33. Hopkinson, P., Hughes, P. and Layer, G. 2008. Sustainable graduates: Linking formal, informal and campus curricula to embed education for sustainable development in the student learning experience. Environmental Education Research, 14: 435-454.
34. Jackson, P. W. 1968. Life in classrooms, New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
35. Jones, P., Selby, D. and Sterling, S. 2010. Sustainability education: Perspectives and practice across higher education, London: Earthscan.
36. Kentli, F. D. 2009. Comparison of hidden curriculum theories. European Journal of Education Studies, 1: 83-88.
37. Lacey, C. 1970. Hightown grammar, Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
38. Latour, B. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
39. Lynch, K. 1989. The hidden curriculum: Reproduction in education, a reappraisal, London: The Falmer Press.
40. Mackie, M. and Jones, P. 2010. The campus as a learning resource: A briefing paper, Plymouth: University of Plymouth.
41. Malone, K. and Tranter, P. 2005. 'Hanging out in the schoolground': A reflective look at researching children's environmental learning. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10: 212-224.
42. Margolis, E. and Romero, M. 1998. The department is very male, very white, very old and very conservative: The functioning of the hidden curriculum in graduate sociology departments. Harvard Educational Review, 68: 1-32.
43. Mullard, C. 1982. " Multi-racial education in Britain: From assimilation to cultural pluralism ". In Race, immigration and schooling, Edited by: Tierney, J. 120-133. London: Holt International.
44. Portelli, J. P. 1993. Exposing the hidden curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25: 343-358.
45. Purvis, S. and Grainger, A., eds. 2004. Exploring sustainable development: Geographical perspectives, London: Earthscan.
46. Skelton, A. 1997. Studying hidden curricula: Developing a perspective in the light of post-modern insights. Pedagogy, Climate and Society, 5: 177-193.
47. Snyder, B. R. 1971. The hidden curriculum, New York: Knopf.
48. Stake, R. E. 1995. The art of case study research, London: Sage.
49. Stanworth, M. 1981. Gender and schooling, London: Hutchinson.
50. Sterling, S. 2001. Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change, Totnes: Green Books.
51. University of Gloucester (2009). Education for sustainability framework for the University of Gloucester., Retrieved from http://www.glos.ac.uk/about/sustainability/education/Pages/efs.aspx
52. Vallance, E. 1980. The hidden curriculum and qualitative inquiry as states of mind. Journal of Education, 162: 138-151.
53. Willis, P. 1978. Learning to labour, New York: Colombia University Press.
54. Yinger, R. J. 1986. Examining thought in action: A theoretical and methodological critique of research on interactive teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2: 263-282.