TEODOOR: A distributed geodata infrastructure for terrestrial observation data

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 507-521

  Kunkel, Ralf ^a   Sorg, Jürgen ^a   Eckardt, Robert ^b   Kolditz, Olaf ^b   Rink, Karsten ^b   Vereecken, Harry ^a  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Monitoring; OGC web services; Sensor web; Spatial data infrastructure; Terrestrial observatories

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; MONITORING; OBSERVATORIES; SENSOR NETWORKS; WEBSITES;

DATA AND METADATA; ENVIRONMENTAL DATA; HIERARCHICAL SEARCH; MEASURED PARAMETERS; MONITORING STATIONS; OGC WEB SERVICES; SENSOR WEB; SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE;

WEB SERVICES;

DATA ACQUISITION; DECISION MAKING; GIS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; METADATA; PARAMETERIZATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM;

EID: 84876950615     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2370-7     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. 52° North (2012) Sensor Web Community. 52° North-initiative for geospatial open source software GmbH. http://52north. org/communities/sensorweb/. Accessed 30 Aug 2012.
2. Ames DP, Horsburgh J, Goodall J, Whiteaker T, Tarboton D, Maidment D (2009) Introducing the open source CUAHSI Hydrologic Information System Desktop application (HIS Desktop). In: 18th World Imacs Congress and Modsim09 International Congress on modelling and simulation: interfacing modelling and simulation with mathematical and computational sciences.
3. Ames DP, Horsburgh JS, Cao Y, Kadlec J, Whiteaker T, Valentine D (2012) HydroDesktop: web services-based software for hydrologic data discovery, download, visualization, and analysis. Environ Model Softw 37: 146-156. doi: 10. 1016/j. envsoft. 2012. 03. 013.
4. Band L, Ogden F, Goodrich D, Hooper R, Kane D, Lyons B, McKnight D, Miller N, Williams M, Potter K, Scanlon B, Pielke RA, Sr., Reckhow K (2005) Designing a network of hydrologic observatories as a community service. Report of a workshop held at Logan, UT August 24-25, 2004. CUAHSI. doi: 10. 4211/techrpts. 200501. tr7.
5. Bogena HR, Schulz K, Vereecken H (2006) TERENO: towards a network of observatories in terrestrial environmental research. Adv Geosci 9: 109-114.
6. Bose R (2002) A conceptual framework for composing and managing scientific data lineage. In: 14th international conference on scientific and statistical database management, Piscataway, NJ, 2002. IEEE Press, pp 15-19.
7. Botts M (2007) OpenGIS sensor model language (SensorML). implementation specification, vol 1. 0. 0. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland.
8. Botts M, Percivall G, Reed C, Davidson J (2008) OGC Sensor Web enablement: Overview and high level architecture. In: Nittel S, Labrinidis A, Stefanidis A (eds) Geosensor Networks, vol 4540. Lecture notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp 175-190.
9. Bronstert A, Kneis D, Bogena H (2009) Interactions and feedbacks in hydrological change: relevance and possibilities of modelling. Hydrol Wasserbewirtsch 53(5): 289-304.
10. Bröring A, Echterhoff J, Jirka S, Simonis I, Everding T, Stasch C, Liang S, Lemmens R (2011a) New Gener Sens Web Enablement. Sensor 11(3): 2652-2699. doi: 10. 3390/s110302652.
11. Bröring A, Maué P, Janowicz K, Nüst D, Malewski C (2011b) Semantically-enabled sensor plug and play for the sensor web. Sensors 11(8): 7568-7605.
12. Bröring A, Stasch C, Echterhoff J (2012) Sensor observation service interface standard, vol 2. 0. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland.
13. Burt TP, Howden NJK, Worrall F, Whelan MJ (2008) Importance of long-term monitoring for detecting environmental change: lessons from a lowland river in south-east England. Biogeosci 5: 1529-1535.
14. Chen NC, Di LP, Yu GN, Gong JY, Wei YX (2009) Use of ebRIM-based CSW with sensor observation services for registry and discovery of remote-sensing observations. Comput Geosci 35(2): 360-372. doi: 10. 1016/j. cageo. 2008. 08. 003.
15. Cox S (2010) Geographic information: observations and measurements. OGC abstract specification Topic 20, vol 2. 0. 0. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland.
16. Cox S (2011) Observations and measurements. XML implementation, vol 2. 0. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland.
17. Dd Richter, Mobley ML (2009) Monitoring earth's critical zone. Science 326(5956): 1067-1068.
18. Dransch D, Koethur P, Schulte S, Klemann V, Dobslaw H (2010) Assessing the quality of geoscientific simulation models with visual analytics methods-a design study. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(10): 1459-1479. doi: 10. 1080/13658816. 2010. 510800.
19. Echterhoff J, Everding T (2011) OGC event service. Review and current state. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland.
20. ECJRC (2009) INSPIRE metadata implementing rules: technical guidelines based on EN ISO 19115 and EN ISO 19119. European Commission Joint Research Centre.
21. FGDC (2000) Content standard for digital geospatial metadata workbook. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Reston.
22. Gräbe A, Rödiger T, Rink K, Fischer T, Sun F, Wang W, Siebert C, Kolditz O, Grathwohl P (2012) Numerical analysis of the groundwater regime in the western Dead Sea Escarpment, Israel+West Bank.) Catchments as reactors: A comprehensive approach for water fluxes and solute turn-over. Environmental Earth Science (to be submitted).
23. Gray J, Liu D, Nieto-Santisteban TM, Szalay A, DeWitt DJ, Heber G (2005) Scientific data management in the coming decade. SIGMOD Rec 34(4): 34-41. doi: 10. 1145/1107499. 1107503.
24. Horsburgh JS, Tarboton DG, Maidment DR, Zaslavsky I (2008) A relational model for environmental and water resources data. Water Resour Res 44(5). doi: 10. 1029/2007wr006392.
25. Houbie Fdr, Skivée F, Jirka S (2010) OGC Catalogue services specification 2. 0. Extension package for ebRIM application profile: SensorML, vol 0. 3. 0. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland.
26. ISO (2003) ISO/DIS 19115: Geographic information-metadata. vol ISO/DIS 19115. International Organization for Standardization.
27. ISO (2009) Information and documentation. The Dublin core metadata element set. ISO, Dublin.
28. Jirka S, Broring A, Stasch C (2009) Discovery mechanisms for the sensor web. Sensors 9(4): 2661-2681. doi: 10. 3390/s90402661.
29. Jirka S, Bröring A, Kjeld P, Maidens J, Wytzisk A (2012) A Lightweight approach for the sensor observation service to share environmental data across Europe. Trans GIS 16(3): 293-312.
30. Keller M, Schimel DS, Hangrove WW, Hoffman FM (2008) A continental strategy for the National Ecological Observatory Network. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 282-284.
31. Kolditz O, Bauer S, Bilke L, Böttcher N, Delfs JO, Fischer T, Görke UJ, Kalbacher T, Kosakowski G, McDermott CI, Park CH, Radu F, Rink K, Shao H, Shao H, Sun F, Sun YY, Singh AK, Taron J, Walther M, Wang W, Watanabe N, Wu N, Xie M, Xu W, Zehner B (2012a) OpenGeoSys: an open-source initiative for numerical simulation of thermo-hydro-mechanical/chemical (THM/C) processes in porous media. Environ Earth Sci 67(2): 589-599. doi: 10. 1007/s12665-012-1546-x.
32. Kolditz O, Rink K, Shao H, Kalbacher T, Kunkel R, Zacharias S, Dietrich P (2012b) Data modelling platforms in environmental Earth sciences. Environ Earth Sci 66(4): 1279-1284. doi: 10. 1007/s12665-012-1661-8.
33. kZen Labs (2012) Buddata ebXML Registry/Repository. http://www. buddata-open. org/. Accessed 30 Aug 2012.
34. lat/lon (2009) deegree Web Processing Service v2. 5. Lat/lon GmbH, Bonn; Department of Geography Bonn University, Bonn, Germany.
35. Lesage N (2007) OGC Cataloguing of ISO Metadata (CIM). Using the ebRIM profile of CS-W, vol 0. 1. 7. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland.
36. Lin H (2003) Hydropedology: bridging disciplines, scales, and data. Vadoze Zone J 2: 1-11.
37. Lin H (2010) Earth's Critical Zone and hydropedology: concepts, characteristics, and advances. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14: 25-45.
38. Mauder M, Cuntz M, Druee C, Graf A, Rebmann C, Schmid HP, Schmidt M, Steinbrecher R (2013) A strategy for quality and uncertainty assessment of long-term eddy-covariance measurements. Agric Meteorol 169: 122-135. doi: 10. 1016/j. agrformet. 2012. 09. 006.
39. McDonnell JJ, Sivapalan M, Vachè K, Dunn S, Grant G, Haggerty R, Hinz C, Hooper R, Kirchner J, Roderick ML, Selker J, Weiler M (2007) Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: a new vision for watershed hydrology. Water Resour Res 43(7): W07301. doi: 10. 1029/2006wr005467.
40. Michener WK, Brunt JW, Helly JJ, Kirchner TB, Stafford SG (1997) Nongeospatial metadata for the ecological sciences. Ecol Appl 7(1): 330-342. doi: 10. 2307/2269427.
41. Mohammadi H, Rajabifard A (2009) Multi-source spatial data integration within the context of SDI initiatives. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Reseach 4: 18.
42. Montgomery JL, Harmon T, Haas CN, Hooper R, Clesceri NL, Graham W, Kaiser W, Sanderson A, Minsker B, Schnoor J, Brezonik Patrick (2007) The WATERS Network: an integrated environmental observatory network for water research. Environ Sci Technol 41(19): 6642-6647. doi: 10. 1021/es072618f.
43. Na A, Priest M (2007) Sensor Observation Service. vol 1. 0. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., Wayland.
44. Nebert DD (2005) Developing spatial data infrastructures: the SDI cookbook.
45. Nebert D, Whiteside A, Vretanos P (2007) OpenGIS Catalogue Services Specification, vol 2. 0. 2, Corrigendum 2 Release. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland.
46. Nisbet E (2007) Earth monitoring: cinderella science. Nature 450: 789-790.
47. Nogueras-Iso J, Zarazaga-Soria FJ, Béjar R, Álvarez PJ, Muro-Medrano PR (2005) OGC catalog services: a key element for the development of Spatial Data Infrastructures. Comput Geosci 31(2): 199-209. doi: 10. 1016/j. cageo. 2004. 05. 015.
48. OASIS (2002) OASIS/ebXML Registry Information Model, vol 2. 0. The Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information 1640 Standards [OASIS].
49. OGC (2012) OGC standards and supporting documents. Open Geospatial Consortium. http://www. opengeospatial. org/standards. Accessed 20 Aug 2012.
50. OSGeo (2012a) GeoNetwork Opensource. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. http://geonetwork-opensource. org. Accessed 02 Oct 2012.
51. OSGeo (2012b) Geoserver. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. http://geoserver. org. Accessed 02 Oct 2012.
52. Parr TW, Sier ARJ, Battarbee RW, Mackay A, Burgess J (2003) Detecting environmental change: science and society, Äîperspectives on long-term research and monitoring in the 21st century. Sci Total Environ 310: 1-8. doi: 10. 1016/s0048-9697(03)00257-2.
53. Philips A, Williamson I (1999) Spatial data infrastructure concepts. Aust Surv 44(1): 8.
54. Plone Foundation (2004) Plone. http://www. plone. org. Accessed 30 Aug 2012.
55. Reid WV, Bréchignac C, Tseh Lee Y (2009) Earth system research priorities. Science 325(5938): 245.
56. Rink K, Fischer T, Selle B, Kolditz O (2012a) A data exploration framework for validation and setup of hydrological models. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10. 1007/s12665-012-2030-3.
57. Rink K, Kalbacher T, Kolditz O (2012b) Visual data exploration for hydrological analysis. Environ Earth Sci 65(5): 1395-1403. doi: 10. 1007/s12665-011-1230-6.
58. Selle B, Rink K, Kolditz O (2012) Recharge and discharge controls on groundwater travel times and flow paths to production wells for the Ammer catchment in SW Germany. Environ Earth Sci (submitted).
59. Simonis I, Echterhoff J (2011) OGC Sensor Planning Service Implementation Standard. vol 2. 0. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland.
60. Simonis I, Wytzisk A (2003) Web Notification Service. vol 0. 1. 0. Open Geospatial Consortium, Wayland.
61. Sorg J (2012) Entwurf. Implementierung und Anwendung eines OGC-konformen sensor observation service für flächenbezogene rasterzeitreihendaten. Master, Fernuniversität Hagen, Hagen.
62. Sun F, Shao H (2012) Groundwater deterioration in Nankou, a suburban area of Beijing: data assessment and remediation scenarios. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10. 1007/s12665-012-1600-8.
63. Tarboton DG, Horsburgh JS, Maidment DR, Whiteaker T, Zaslavsky I, Piasecki M, Goodall J, Valentine D, Whitenack T (2009) Development of a Community Hydrologic Information System. In: 18th World Imacs Congress and Modsim09 International Congress on modelling and simulation: interfacing modelling and simulation with mathematical and computational sciences.
64. TERENO (2010) TERENO Data policy. http://teodoor. icg. kfa-juelich. de/downloads/TERENO Data policy. pdf/. Accessed 20 Aug 2012.
65. Teutsch G, Krüger E (2010) Water science alliance-research priority areas. http://www. water-research-horizon. ufz. de/.
66. Theisselmann F, Dransch D, Haubrock S (2009) Service-oriented Architecture for Environmental Modelling-The Case of a Distributed Dike Breach Information System. In: 18th World Imacs Congress and Modsim09 International Congress on modelling and simulation: interfacing modelling and simulation with mathematical and computational sciences.
67. Tomasic A, Simon E (1997) Improving access to environmental data using context information. SIGMOD Rec 26(1): 11-15. doi: 10. 1145/248603. 248606.
68. Wollschläger U, Zacharias S (2012) The Bode Catchment as part of the TERENO Harz/Central German Lowland Observatory: A platform for inte-grated hydrological research. Bode observatory. Environ Earth Sci (submitted).
69. Zacharias S, Dietrich P, Vogel H-J, Seppelt R, Borchardt D, Klotz S, Messner F, Teutsch G, Helmholtz Centre Environmental R-U (2008) Tereno-methodological approach for the implementation of a terrestrial obsevatory for environmental research in Central Germany. Consoil 2008: Theme B-Functions and Values of Soil-Water Systems; Understanding of Processes.
70. Zacharias S, Bogena H, Samaniego L, Mauder M, Fuss R, Puetz T, Frenzel M, Schwank M, Baessler C, Butterbach-Bahl K, Bens O, Borg E, Brauer A, Dietrich P, Hajnsek I, Helle G, Kiese R, Kunstmann H, Klotz S, Munch JC, Papen H, Priesack E, Schmid HP, Steinbrecher R, Rosenbaum U, Teutsch G, Vereecken H (2011) A network of terrestrial environmental observatories in Germany. Vadose Zone J 10(3): 955-973. doi: 10. 2136/vzj2010. 0139.
71. Zoback ML (2001) Grand challenges in earth and environmental sciences: sciences, stewardship, and service for the twenty first century. GSA Today 12: 41-47.