메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 389-399

Writing biomedical manuscripts part II: Standard elements and common errors;Rédaction biomédicale partie manuscrits II: Eléments standard et erreurs communes

Author keywords

Attributes; Biomedical; Common errors; Standard elements; Writing manuscript

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ERROR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE; LETTER; MEDICAL ILLUSTRATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MISCONDUCT; NOMENCLATURE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDY DESIGN; WORK; WRITING;

EID: 84876928916     PISSN: 0189160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (6)

References (21)
  • 1
    • 0034833464 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports
    • Bordage G. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med 2001; 76: 889-896
    • (2001) Acad Med , vol.76 , pp. 889-896
    • Bordage, G.1
  • 3
    • 79952915867 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why your manuscript was rejected and how to prevent it?
    • [serial online] [cited 2011 Jul 17] Available from
    • Dogra S. Why your manuscript was rejected and how to prevent it? Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2011 Jul 17];77: 123-7. Available from: http:// www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2011/77/2/ 123/77449
    • (2011) Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol , vol.77 , pp. 123-127
    • Dogra, S.1
  • 4
    • 34247604386 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Provenzale1Ten Principles to Improve the Likelihood of Publication of a Scientific Manuscript
    • James M. Provenzale1Ten Principles to Improve the Likelihood of Publication of a Scientific Manuscript AJR AJR 2007; 188: 1179-1182.
    • (2007) AJR AJR , vol.188 , pp. 1179-1182
    • James, M.1
  • 5
    • 16644383354 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication
    • Pierson DJ. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. Resp Care 2004; 49: 1246-1252.
    • (2004) Resp Care , vol.49 , pp. 1246-1252
    • Pierson, D.J.1
  • 6
    • 84861311598 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Writing Biomedical Manuscripts Part I: Fundamentals and General Rules
    • Ohwovoriole AE. Writing Biomedical Manuscripts Part I: Fundamentals and General Rules. West Afr J Med. 2011; 30: 151-157.
    • (2011) West Afr J Med. , vol.30 , pp. 151-157
    • Ohwovoriole, A.E.1
  • 7
    • 84890093315 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Updated October 2008. Available at: Accessed on May 21
    • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Updated October 2008. Available at: www.icjme.org. Accessed on May 21, 2010
    • (2010) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals
  • 9
    • 84890034560 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • MeSH
    • MeSH http//www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/.
  • 10
    • 27744472501 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Writing it up: A step-bystep guide to publication for beginning investigators
    • Kliewer MA. Writing it up: a step-bystep guide to publication for beginning investigators. AJR 2005; 185: 591-596
    • (2005) AJR , vol.185 , pp. 591-596
    • Kliewer, M.A.1
  • 11
    • 3543139570 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The art and science of writing manuscripts
    • Arceci RJ. The art and science of writing manuscripts. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2004; 43: 207-210.
    • (2004) Pediatr Blood Cancer , vol.43 , pp. 207-210
    • Arceci, R.J.1
  • 12
    • 26944494572 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript
    • Cetin S, Hackam DJ. An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript. J Surg Res 2005; 128: 165-167.
    • (2005) J Surg Res , vol.128 , pp. 165-167
    • Cetin, S.1    Hackam, D.J.2
  • 13
    • 0003802728 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Amended October 2008. Available at: Accessed on September 1
    • World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Amended October 2008. Available at: www.wma.net/e/policy/ b3.htm. Accessed on September 1, 2009.
    • (2009) Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects
  • 16
    • 33744953536 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to read, understand, and write 'Discussion' sections in medical articles. An exercise in critical thinking
    • Jenicek M. How to read, understand, and write 'Discussion' sections in medical articles. An exercise in critical thinking. Med Sci Monit 2006; 12: SR28-36.
    • (2006) Med Sci Monit , vol.12
    • Jenicek, M.1
  • 17
    • 79952915867 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why your manuscript was rejected and how to prevent it?
    • [serial online] [cited 2011 Jul 17]. Available from
    • Dogra S. Why your manuscript was rejected and how to prevent it?. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2011 Jul 17];77: 123-7. Available from: http:// www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2011/77/2/ 123/77449.
    • (2011) Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol , vol.77 , pp. 123-127
    • Dogra, S.1
  • 19
    • 3042782720 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: Comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms
    • Bates T, Anic A, Marusic M, Marusic A. Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. JAMA 2004; 292: 86-8.
    • (2004) JAMA , vol.292 , pp. 86-88
    • Bates, T.1    Anic, A.2    Marusic, M.3    Marusic, A.4
  • 20
    • 0030999021 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The vexed question of authorship: Views of researchers in a British medical faculty
    • Bhopal R, Rankin J, McColl E, Thomas L, Kaner E, Stacy R, et al. The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ 1997; 314: 1009-12.
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 1009-1012
    • Bhopal, R.1    Rankin, J.2    McColl, E.3    Thomas, L.4    Kaner, E.5    Stacy, R.6
  • 21
    • 25444473969 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review. Suggesting or excluding reviewers can help get your paper published
    • Grimm D. Peer review. Suggesting or excluding reviewers can help get your paper published. Science 2005; 309: 1974.
    • (2005) Science , vol.309 , pp. 1974
    • Grimm, D.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.