Risk factors for advanced neoplasia within subcentimetric polyps: Implications for diagnostic imaging

Gut

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 863-870

  Kolligs, Frank Thomas ^a   Crispin, Alexander ^a   Graser, Anno ^b   Munte, Axel ^c   Mansmann, Ulrich ^a   Göke, Burkhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Bavarian Association of Compulsory Health Insurance Physicians   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCULT BLOOD; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84876923975     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300111     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225-49.
2. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108. (Pubitemid 40372904)
3. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570-95. (Pubitemid 351615355)
4. Pawa N, Arulampalam T, Norton JD. Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;8:711-22.
5. Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-Navas M, et al . Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:581-9.e1.
6. Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I, et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;361:264-70.
7. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 2009;58:241-8.
8. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1207-17.
9. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-200. (Pubitemid 37485135)
10. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1863-72. (Pubitemid 44664644)
11. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005;365:305-11. (Pubitemid 40139107)
12. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000;343:162-8. (Pubitemid 30489212)
13. Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1100-5.
14. Banerjee S, Van Dam J. CT colonography for colon cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:121-33. (Pubitemid 41827791)
15. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236:3-9. (Pubitemid 40853289)
16. Ransohoff DF. CON: Immediate colonoscopy is not necessary in patients who have polyps smaller than 1 cm on computed tomographic colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1905-7; discussion 1907-8.
17. Rex DK. PRO: Patients with polyps smaller than 1 cm on computed tomographic colonography should be offered colonoscopy and polypectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1903-5; discussion 1907-8.
18. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:739-50.
19. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2007;17:575-9. (Pubitemid 46140331)
20. Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi- Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1865-71. (Pubitemid 43668858)
21. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1872-85. (Pubitemid 43668826)
22. Hassan C, Benamouzig R, Spada C, et al. Cost-effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France. Endoscopy 2011;43:780-93.
23. Bretagne JF, Manfredi S, Piette C, et al. Yield of high-grade dysplasia based on polyp size detected at colonoscopy: a series of 2295 examinations following a positive fecal occult blood test in a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53:339-45.
24. Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H, et al . Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:343-8. (Pubitemid 43343891)
25. Gschwantler M, Kriwanek S, Langner E, et al. High-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: a multivariate analysis of the impact of adenoma and patient characteristics. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;14:183-8. (Pubitemid 34163998)
26. Pickhardt PJ, Hain KS, Kim DH, et al. Low rates of cancer or high-grade dysplasia in colorectal polyps collected from computed tomography colonography screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:610-15.
27. Rex DK, Overhiser AJ, Chen SC, et al. Estimation of impact of American College of Radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:149-53.
28. Hermanek P, Fruhmorgen P, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, et al. The malignant potential of colorectal polyps - a new statistical approach. Endoscopy 1983;15:16-20. (Pubitemid 13171080)
29. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Partzsch U, et al. Invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: multivariate analysis of patient and adenoma characteristics. Endoscopy 1997;29:626-31. (Pubitemid 27472603)
30. Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, et al. At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach. Int J Cancer 2009;124:1161-8.
31. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer 2007;109:2213-21. (Pubitemid 46801550)
32. Shah JP, Hynan LS, Rockey DC. Management of small polyps detected by screening CT colonography: patient and physician preferences. Am J Med 2009;122:687.e1-9.
33. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:959-65.
34. Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Schembre DB, et al. Risk stratification for colon neoplasia: screening strategies using colonoscopy and computerized tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 2006;131:1011-19. (Pubitemid 44515105)
35. Fennerty MB, Davidson J, Emerson SS, et al. Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable? Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:496-500. (Pubitemid 23106580)
36. Gopalswamy N, Shenoy VN, Choudhry U, et al. Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:497-502. (Pubitemid 28018543)
37. Morales TG, Sampliner RE, Garewal HS, et al. The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:25-8. (Pubitemid 26039184)
38. Schoen RE, Gerber LD, Margulies C. The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:492-6. (Pubitemid 28018542)
39. Gupta S, Durkalski V, Cotton P, et al. Variation of agreement in polyp size measurement between computed tomographic colonography and pathology assessment: clinical implications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:220-7. (Pubitemid 351172941)