Examining internet resources on gender differences in ACL injuries: What patients are reading

Knee

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 196-202

  Gosselin, Michelle M ^a   Mulcahey, Mary K ^a   Feller, Edward ^a   Hulstyn, Michael J ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries; Female ACL; Gender differences; Internet information

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURY; ARTICLE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; WRITING;

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; COMMUNICATION; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOR; INTERNET; KNEE INJURIES; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84876829362     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Internet world stats: usage and population statistics December 31, 2011, Internet World Statistics, [Accessed May 1, 2012, ].
2. International telecommunications union data and statistics April 4, 2012, International Telecommunications Union, [Accessed May 1, 2012, ].
3. Bernstam E.V., Shelton D.M., Walji M., Meric-Bernstam F. Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: what can our patients actually use?. Int J Med Inform 2004, 74:13-19.
4. Couper M.P., Singer E., Levin C.A., Fowler F.J., Fagerlin A., Zikmund-Fischer B.J. Use of the internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 2010, 30:106S.
5. Beredjiklian P.K., Bonzentka D.J., Steingberg D.R., Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet: the case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82:1540-1543.
6. Mathur S., Shanti N., Brkaric M., Sood V., Kubeck J., Paulino C., et al. Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the internet. Spine 2005, 30:2695-2700.
7. Starman J., Gettys K., Capo J., Fleischli J.E., Norton H.J., Karunakar M.A. Quality and content of internet-based information for ten common orthopaedic sports medicine diagnoses. J Bone Joint Surg 2010, 92:1612-1618.
8. Health on the net code of conduct for medical and health websites April 4, 2012, Health on the Net Foundation, [Accessed May 3, 2012, ].
9. Winker M.A., Flanagin A., Chi-Lum B., White J., Andrews K., Kennett R.L., et al. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet. JAMA 2000, 283:1600-1606.
10. Griffin L.Y., Albohm M.J., Arendt E.A., Bahr R., Beynnon B.D., Demaio M., et al. Understanding and preventing noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a review of the Hunt Valley II meeting, January 2005. Am J Sports Med 2006, 34(9):1512-1532.
11. Top Ten Search Engines List List of search engines Accessed May 1, 2012. http://www.listofsearchengines.info/.
12. comScore: Yahoo's search share drops again in December Search Engine Watch. Accessed May 1, 2012. http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2048881/comScore-Yahoos-Search-Share-Drops-Again-in-December.
13. Eysenbach G., Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002, 324:573-577.
14. Kutner M., Greenberg E., Baer J. National assessment of adult literacy (NAAL). A first look at the literacy of America's adults in the 21st century December 15, 2005, National Center for Education Statistics, [Accessed June 2, 2011, ].
15. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) disclosure program February 2012, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, [Accessed May 27, 2012, ].
16. Ley P., Florio T. The use of readability formulas in healthcare. Psychol Health Med 1996, 1:7-28.
17. Braddock C.H. The emerging importance and relevance of shared decision making to clinical practice. Med Decis Making 2010, 30:5S-7S.