Understanding the basis of diminished gene flow between hybridizing chromosome races of the house mouse

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1446-1462

  Giménez, Mabel D ^a,b   White, Thomas A ^c,d   Hauffe, Heidi C ^a,e   Panithanarak, Thadsin ^a,f   Searle, Jeremy B ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE MISIONES   (Argentina)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^e RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^f BURAPHA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Hybrid zone; Mus musculus domesticus; Robertsonian fusion; Simulation modeling; Speciation

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EPISTASIS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; HYBRID ZONE; HYBRIDIZATION; RECOMBINATION; RODENT; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME; EPISTASIS; GENE FLOW; GENE TRANSLOCATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; ITALY; MOUSE; POPULATION;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKERS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; ITALY; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC;

ITALY; LOMBARDY; VALTELLINA;

MUS MUSCULUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; ROBERTSONIA;

EID: 84876823566     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12054     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Amos, W., S. J. Sawcer, R. Feakes, and D. C. Rubinsztein. 1996. Microsatellites show mutational bias and heterozygote instability. Nat. Genet. 13:390-391.
2. Baker, R. J., and J. W. Bickham. 1986. Speciation by monobrachial centric fusions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:8245-8248.
3. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113-148.
4. Basset, P., G. Yannic, H. Brünner, and J. Hausser. 2006. Restricted gene flow at specific parts of the shrew genome in chromosomal hybrid zones. Evolution 60:1718-1730.
5. Bímová, B. V., M. Macholán, S. J. E. Baird, P. Munclinger, P. Dufková, C. M. Laukaitis, R. C. Karn, K. Luzynski, P. K. Tucker, and J. Piálek. 2011. Reinforcement selection acting on the European house mouse hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 20:2403-2424.
6. Boursot, P., J. C. Auffray, J. Britton-Davidian, and F. Bonhomme. 1993. The evolution of house mice. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:119-152.
7. Capanna, E., and M. Corti. 1982. Reproductive isolation between two chromosomal races of Mus musculus in the Rhaetian Alps (northern Italy). Mammalia 46:107-109.
8. Carneiro, M., N. Ferrand, and M. W. Nachman. 2009. Recombination and speciation: loci near centromeres are more differentiated than loci near telomeres between subspecies of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Genetics 181:593-606.
9. Carneiro, M., J. A. Blanco-Aguiar, R. Villafuerte, N. Ferrand, and M. W. Nachman. 2010. Speciation in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): islands of differentiation on the X chromosome and autosomes. Evolution 64:3443-3460.
10. Castiglia, R., and E. Capanna. 2000. Contact zone between chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus. 2. Fertility and segregation in laboratory-reared and wild mice heterozygous for multiple Robertsonian rearrangements. Heredity 85:147-156.
11. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
12. Davisson, M. T. 1996. Rules and guidelines for gene nomenclature. Pp. 1-16 in M. F. Lyon, S. Rastan, and S. D. M. Brown, eds. Genetic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
13. Estoup, A., and B. Angers. 1998. Microsatellites and minisatellites for molecular ecology: theoretical and empirical considerations. Pp. 55-86 in G. Carvalho, ed. Advances in molecular ecology. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
14. Excoffier, L., and H. E. L. Lischer. 2010. Arlequin suite ver. 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Res. 10:564-567.
15. Faria, R., and A. Navarro. 2010. Chromosomal speciation revisited: rearranging theory with pieces of evidence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:660-669.
16. Feder, J. L., S. P. Egan, and P. Nosil. 2012. The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow. Trends Genet. 28:342-350.
17. Fedyk, S., and W. Chetnicki. 2010. Non-disjunction frequency in male complex Robertsonian heterozygotes of the common shrew. Acta Theriol. 55:1-8.
18. Forejt, J. 1996. Hybrid sterility in the mouse. Trends Genet. 12:412-417.
19. Fraguedakis-Tsolis, S., H. C. Hauffe, and J. B. Searle. 1997. Genetic distinctiveness of a village population of house mice: relevance to speciation and chromosomal evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:355-360.
20. Franchini, P., P. Colangelo, E. Solano, E. Capanna, E. Verheyen, and R. Castiglia. 2010. Reduced gene flow at pericentromeric loci in a hybrid zone involving chromosomal races of the Mus musculus domesticus. Evolution 64:2020-2032.
21. Ganem, G., C. Litel, and T. Lenormand. 2008. Variation in mate preference across a house mouse hybrid zone. Heredity 100:594-601.
22. Harrison, R. G. 1990. Hybrid zones: windows on the evolutionary process. Pp. 69-128 in D. Futuyma and J. Antonovics, eds. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, volume 7. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
23. Hauffe, H. C., and J. B. Searle. 1992. A disappearing speciation event. Nature 357:26.
24. Hauffe, H. C., and J. B. Searle. 1993. Extreme karyotypic variation in a Mus musculus domesticus hybrid zone: the tobacco mouse story revisited. Evolution 47:1374-1395.
25. Hauffe, H. C., and J. B. Searle. 1998. Chromosomal heterozygosity and fertility in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from northern Italy. Genetics 150:1143-1154.
26. Hauffe, H. C., J. Piálek, and J. B. Searle. 2000. The house mouse chromosomal hybrid zone in Valtellina (SO): a summary of past and present research. Hystrix 11:17-25.
27. Hauffe, H. C., T. Panithanarak, J. F. Dallas, J. Piálek, I. Gündüz, and J. B. Searle. 2004. The tobacco mouse and its relatives: a "tail" of coat colors, chromosomes, hybridization and speciation. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 105:395-405.
28. Horn, A., P. Basset, G. Yannic, A. Banaszek, P. M. Borodin, N. S. Bulatova, K. Jadwiszczak, R. M. Jones, A. V. Polyakov, M. Ratkiewicz, et al. 2012. Chromosomal rearrangements do not seem to affect the gene flow in hybrid zones between karyotypic races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Evolution 66:882-889.
29. Jackson, B. C. 2011. Recombination-suppression: how many mechanisms for chromosomal speciation? Genetica 139:393-402.
30. Jadwiszczak, K. A., and A. Banaszek. 2006. Fertility in the male common shrews, Sorex araneus, from the extremely narrow hybrid zone between chromosome races. Mamm. Biol. 71:257-267.
31. Jiggins, C. D., and J. Mallet. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:250-255.
32. Johannisson, R., and H. Winking. 1994. Synaptonemal complexes of chains and rings in mice heterozygous for multiple Robertsonian translocations. Chrom. Res. 2:137-145.
33. King, M. 1993. Species evolution: the role of chromosome change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
34. Macholán, M., S. J. E. Baird, P. Munclinger, and J. Piálek, eds. 2012. Evolution of the house mouse. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
35. Maynard Smith, J., and J. Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet. Res. 23:23-35.
36. Muggeo, V. M. R. 2008. Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News 8:20-25.
37. Nachman, M. W. 2002. Variation in recombination rate across the genome: evidence and implications. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12:657-663.
38. Nachman, M. W., and G. A. Churchill. 1996. Heterogeneity in rates of recombination across the mouse genome. Genetics 142:537-548.
39. Nachman, M. W., and B. A. Payseur. 2012. Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367:409-421.
40. Navarro, A., and N. H. Barton. 2003. Accumulating postzygotic isolation genes in parapatry: a new twist on chromosomal speciation. Evolution 57:447-459.
41. Neafsey, D. E., M. K. N. Lawniczak, D. J. Park, S. N. Redmond, M. B. Coulibaly, S. F. Traore, N. Sagnon, C. Costantini, C. Johnson, R. C. Wiegand, et al. 2010. SNP genotyping defines complex gene-flow boundaries among African malaria vector mosquitoes. Science 330:514-517.
42. Noor, M. A. F., and S. M. Bennett. 2009. Islands of speciation or mirages in the desert? Examining the role of restricted recombination in maintaining species. Heredity 103:439-444.
43. Noor, M. A. F., K. L. Grams, L. A. Bertucci, and J. Reiland. 2001. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:12084-12088.
44. Nunes, A. C., J. Catalan, J. Lopez, M. D. Ramalhinho, M. D. Mathias, and J. Britton-Davidian. 2011. Fertility assessment in hybrids between monobrachially homologous Rb races of the house mouse from the island of Madeira: implications for modes of chromosomal evolution. Heredity 106:348-356.
45. Panithanarak, T., H. C. Hauffe, J. F. Dallas, A. Glover, R. G. Ward, and J. B. Searle. 2004. Linkage-dependent gene flow in a house mouse chromosomal hybrid zone. Evolution 58:184-192.
46. Piálek, J., H. C. Hauffe, K. M. Rodríguez-Clark, and J. B. Searle. 2001. Raciation and speciation in house mice from the Alps: the role of chromosomes. Mol. Ecol. 10:613-625.
47. Piálek, J., H. C. Hauffe, and J. B. Searle. 2005. Chromosomal variation in the house mouse: a review. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84:565-583.
48. Pinho, C., and J. Hey. 2010. Divergence with gene flow: models and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evo. Syst. 41, 215-230.
49. Pocock, M. J. O., H. C. Hauffe, and J. B. Searle. 2005. Dispersal in house mice. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84:565-583.
50. Polyakov, A. V., T. A. White, R. M. Jones, P. M. Borodin, and J. B. Searle. 2011. Natural hybridisation between extremely divergent chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus, Soricidae, Soricomorpha): hybrid zone in Siberia. J. Evol. Biol. 24:1393-1402.
51. Rieseberg, L. H. 2001. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:351-358.
52. Sans-Fuentes, M. A., J. García-Valero, J. Ventura, and M. J. López-Fuster. 2010. Spermatogenesis in house mouse in a Robertsonian polymorphism zone. Reproduction 140:569-581.
53. Searle, J. B. 1993. Chromosomal hybrid zones in eutherian mammals. Pp. 309-353 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY.
54. Selander, R. K. 1970. Behavior and genetic variation in natural populations. Amer. Zool. 10:53-66.
55. Smadja, C., and G. Ganem. 2005. Asymmetrical reproductive character displacement in the house mouse. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1485-1493.
56. Smadja, C. M., and R. K. Butlin. 2011. A framework for comparing processes of speciation in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 20:5123-5140.
57. Turner, T. L., M. W. Hahn, and S. V. Nuzhdin. 2005. Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Biol. 3:e285.
58. Wallace, B. M. N., and J. B. Searle. 1990. Synaptonemal complex studies of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Comparison of Robertsonian heterozygotes and homozygotes by light microscopy. Heredity. 65:359-367.
59. Wallace, B. M. N., J. B. Searle, and C. A. Everett. 2002. The effect of multiple simple Robertsonian heterozygosity on chromosome pairing and fertility of wild-stock house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 96:276-286.
60. Weir, B. S., and C. C. Cockerham. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
61. White, T. A., M. Bordewich, and J. B. Searle. 2010. A network approach to study karyotypic evolution: the chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) and house mouse (Mus musculus) as model systems. Syst. Biol. 59:262-276.
62. Yannic, G., P. Basset, and J. Hausser. 2009. Chromosomal rearrangements and gene flow over time in an inter-specific hybrid zone of the Sorex araneus group. Heredity 102:616-625.