Risk assessment of nanomaterials and nanoproducts-adaptation of traditional approaches

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Volumn 429, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Jahnel, J ^a   Fleischer, T ^a   Seitz, S B ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH RISKS; LIFE CYCLE; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

APPLICATIONS OF NANOTECHNOLOGIES; CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; PROTECTION GOALS; REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT; RISK GOVERNANCE; SOCIETAL IMPACTS; TECHNICAL IMPROVEMENT; TRADITIONAL APPROACHES;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84876819584     PISSN: 17426588     EISSN: 17426596     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/429/1/012063     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E and Oberdörster J 2005 Environ Health Perspect 113 (7) 823-839
2. Regulation EC/1907/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) OJ L 396/1 30.12.2006
3. SCENIHR 2007 Opinion on the appropriateness of the risk assessment methodology in accordance with the technical guidance documents for new and existing substances for assessing the risk of nanomaterials (Brussels: European Commission) http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph-risk/committees/04-scenihr/docs/ scenihr-o-010.pdf
4. EFSA 2011 EFSA J. 9 2140
5. Grieger K D, Laurent A, Miseljic M, Christensen F, Baun A, Olsen S I 2012 J Nanopart Res 14 958-981
6. Tervonen I, Linkov J, Figueira J Steevens J, Chappell M and Merad M 2009 J Nanopart Res 11 757-766
7. SCENIHR 2012 Opinion on the Memorandum on the use of the scientific literature for human health risk assessment purposes-weighing of evidence and expression of uncertainty (Brussels: European Commission) http://ec.europa.eu/ health/scientific-committees/emerging/docs/scenihr-s-001.pdf
8. OECD 2003 OECD Series on Testing and Assessment 44 ENV/JM/MONO vol 15 (Paris: OECD)
9. Risk Commission 2003 Ad hoc Commission on Revision of Risk Analysis Procedures and Structures as well as of Standard Setting in the field of Environmental Health in the Federal Republic of Germany (Berlin) Final Report
10. Rocks S, Pollard S, Dorey R, Levy L, Harrison P and Handy R 2008 Comparison of Risk Assessment Approaches for Manufactured Nanomaterials. Final Report (London: Defra)
11. SCENIHR 2009 Opinion on risk assessment of products of nanotechnologies (Brussels, European Commission) http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph-risk/committees/ 04-scenihr/docs/scenihr-o-023.pdf
12. Aschberger K, Micheletti C, Sokull-Klüttgen B and Christensen F M 2011 Environment Int. 37 (6) 1143-1156
13. Senjen R and Hansen S F 2011 C. R. Physique 12 637-647
14. Cockburn A, Bradford R, Buck N, Constable A, Edwards G, Haber B, Hepburn P, Howlett J, Kampers F, Klein C, Radomski, M, Stamm H, Wijnhoven S and Wildemann T 2012 Food Chem. Toxicology 50 2224-2242
15. Oberdörster G 2010 J Intern Med 267 (1) 89-105
16. OECD 2012 OECD Series on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials 33: ENV/JM/MONO vol 8 (Paris: OECD)
17. ECHA 2012 Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment: Appendix R7-1, R7-2, R8-15, R10-2, R14-4 Recommendations for nanomaterials (Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency)
18. Maynard A D, Aitken R J, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdörster G, Philbert M A, Ryan J, Seaton A and Stone V 2006 Nature 444 (7117) 267-269
19. STOA Fleischer T, Jahnel J, Seitz S B 2012 NanoSafety-risk governance of manufactured nanoparticles. Final report IP/A/STOA/FWC/2008-096/LOT5/C1/SC3 (Brussels: European Parliament, Science and Technology Options Assessment)
20. ENRHES 2010 Engineered Nanoparticles: Review of Health and Environmental Safety. An International Collaborative Review involving Researchers from Edinburgh Napier University, the Institute of Occupational Medicine, the Technical University of Denmark, the Institute for Health and Consumer Protection of the European Commission's Joint Research Centre, and the Institute of Nanotechnology. Project Report http://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology/ reports/reportpdf/report133.pdf
21. Krug H F and Wick P 2011 Angewandte Chemie Int. edn 50 (6) 1260-1278
22. Oberdörster G 2010 Concepts of Nanotoxicology NanoAgri 2010 Conf. http://www.nanoagri2010.com/fao-mini-papers-extra-files.pdf
23. Hauschild M, Jeswiet J and Alting L 2005 CIRP Ann.-Manufacturing Technol. 54 (2) 1-21
24. Zuin S, Micheletti C, Critto A, Pojana G, Johnston H, Stone V, Tran L and Marcomini A 2011 Nanotoxicology 5 (3) 445-458
25. Olson M S and Gurian P L 2012 J Nanopart Res 14 (4) 1-7
26. O'Brien N J and Cummins E J 2011 Risk Analysis 31 (5) 706-726
27. Hodge G A, Bowman D M and Maynard A D 2010 International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar)
28. IRGC 2006 White Paper on Nanotechnology Risk Governance (Geneva: International Risk Governance Council)
29. Renn O and Walker K 2008 Global Risk Governance: Concept and Practice Using the IRGC Framework (Dordrecht: Springer)
30. Fleischer T and Quendt C 2007 Wissenschaftliche Berichte FZKA 7337
31. Fleischer T, Haslinger J, Jahnel J and Seitz S B 2012 Int. J. Emerging Technologies Society 10 (2012) 79-95
32. Grieger K D, Baun A and Olsen R 2010 J Nanopart Res 12 383-392
33. Regulation EC 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the gegeral principles and requirements of food law, establishing the Eurpean Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety OJ L 31/1, 1.2.2002