SpeedRead: A fast named entity recognition pipeline

24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Proceedings of COLING 2012: Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 51-66

  Al Rfou, Rami ^a   Skiena, Steven ^a  

^a Stony Brook University   (United States)

Author keywords

Named entity recognition; NLP pipelines; Part of speech; Tokenization

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMIC METHODS; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; EXTRACTION SYSTEMS; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; ON-LINE CONTENTS; PART OF SPEECH; TOKENIZATION; UNSTRUCTURED TEXTS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PIPELINES;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84876814046     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Bird, S., Klein, E., and Loper, E. (2009). Natural Language Processing with Python. O'Reilly Media.
2. Collobert, R. (2011). Deep learning for efficient discriminative parsing. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
3. Collobert, R. and Weston, J. (2008). A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning, ICML '08, pages 160-167, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
4. Collobert, R., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Karlen, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., and Kuksa, P. (2011). Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2493-2537.
5. Ferragina, P. and Scaiella, U. (2010). Tagme: on-the-fly annotation of short text fragments (by wikipedia entities). In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '10, pages 1625-1628, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
6. Finkel, J. R., Grenager, T., and Manning, C. (2005). Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by gibbs sampling. In In ACL, pages 363-370.
7. Gillick, D. (2009). Sentence boundary detection and the problem with the u.s. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Companion Volume: Short Papers, NAACL-Short '09, pages 241-244, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Gompel, M. V. (2012). Ucto: Unicode tokenizer. http://ilk.uvt.nl/ucto.
9. Klein, D., Smarr, J., Nguyen, H., and Manning, C. D. (2003). Named entity recognition with character-level models. In Daelemans, W. and Osborne, M., editors, Proceedings of CoNLL-2003, pages 180-183. Edmonton, Canada.
10. Lee, H., Peirsman, Y., Chang, A., Chambers, N., Surdeanu, M., and Jurafsky, D. (2011). Stanford's multi-pass sieve coreference resolution system at the conll-2011 shared task. In Proceedings of the CoNLL-2011 Shared Task.
11. Manning, C. D. (2011). Part-of-speech tagging from 97% to 100%: Is it time for some linguistics? In Gelbukh, A. F., editor, CICLing (1), volume 6608 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 171-189. Springer.
12. Milne, D. and Witten, I. H. (2008). An effective, low-cost measure of semantic relatedness obtained from wikipedia links. In In Proceedings of AAAI 2008.
13. Nadeau, D. and Sekine, S. (2007). A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 30(1):3-26.
14. Pauls, A. and Klein, D. (2011). Faster and smaller n-gram language models. In Lin, D., Matsumoto, Y., and Mihalcea, R., editors, ACL, pages 258-267. The Association for Computer Linguistics.
15. Pawel, M. and Robert, D. (2007). Handling conjunctions in named entities. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 30(1):49-68.
16. Schafer, F.-R. (2012). Quex - fast universal lexical analyzer generator. http://quex.sourceforge.net.
17. Scikit, S.-l. D. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825-2830.
18. Tjong Kim Sang, E. F. and De Meulder, F. (2003). Introduction to the conll-2003 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In Daelemans, W. and Osborne, M., editors, Proceedings of CoNLL-2003, pages 142-147. Edmonton, Canada.
19. Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. D., and Singer, Y. (2003). Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - Volume 1, NAACL '03, pages 173-180, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Toutanova, K. and Manning, C. D. (2000). Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing and very large corpora: held in conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 13, EMNLP '00, pages 63-70, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Webster, J. J. and Kit, C. (1992). Tokenization as the initial phase in nlp. In Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 4, COLING '92, pages 1106-1110, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.