Torsional ultrasound mode versus combined torsional and conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification for eyes with hard cataract

Clinical Ophthalmology

Volumn 5, Issue , 2011, Pages 973-978

  Fakhry, Mohamed A ^a,b   El Shazly, Malak I ^a  

^a Cairo University   (Egypt)

^b Department of Retina   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Cataract; Cumulative dissipated energy; Torsional

Indexed keywords

DEXAFLOX; DEXAMETHASONE; DEXAMETHASONE PLUS OFLOXACIN; DEXAMETHASONE PLUS TOBRAMYCIN; OFLOXACIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEST CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; CASE STUDY; CATARACT; CELL DENSITY; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COMBINED TORSIONAL AND CONVENTIONAL ULTRASOUND MODE PHACOEMULSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EGYPT; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LENS IMPLANTATION; LENS OPACITIES CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM III; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TORSIONAL ULTRASOUND MODE PHACOEMULSIFICATION; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

EID: 84876802445     PISSN: 11775467     EISSN: 11775483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S22879     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Zacharias J. Role of cavitation in the phacoemulsification process. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(5):846–852.
2. Davison JA. Cumulative tip travel and implied followability of longitudinal and torsional phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):986–990.
3. Liu Y, Zeng M, Liu X, et al. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(2):287–292.
4. Bozkurt E, Bayraktar S, Yazgan S, et al. Comparison of conventional and torsional mode (OZil) phacoemulsification: randomized prospective clinical study. European J Ophthalmol. 2009;19(6):984–989.
5. Reuschel A, Bogatsch H, Barth T, Wiedemann R. Comparison of endothelial changes and power settings between torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(11): 1855–1861.
6. Zeng M, Liu X, Liu Y, et al. Torsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92(8):1092–1096.
7. Kim DH, Wee WR, Lee JH, Kim MK. The comparison between torsional and conventional mode phacoemulsification in moderate and hard cataracts. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010;24(6):336–340.
8. Kim EK, Cristol SM, Geroski DH, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF. Corneal endothelial damage by air bubbles during phacoemulsification. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(1):81–88.
9. Milla E, Verges C, Cipres M. Corneal endothelium evaluation after phacoemulsification with continuous anterior chamber infusion. Cornea. 2005;24(3):278–282.
10. Ventura AC, Walti R, Bohnke M. Corneal thickness and endothelial density before and after cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85(1):18–20.
11. Zetterstrom C, Laurell CG. Comparison of endothelial cell loss and phacoemulsification energy during endocapsular phacoemulsification surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21(1):55–58.