Capturing paradigmatic and syntagmatic lexical relations: Towards accurate chinese part-of-speech tagging

50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2012 - Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 242-252

  Sun, Weiwei ^a,b,c,d   Uszkoreit, Hans ^c,d  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Graduate School for Computer Science   (Germany)

^c SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHINESE LANGUAGE PROCESSING; CHINESE POS TAGGING; LEXICAL RELATIONS; PART OF SPEECH TAGGING; PENN CHINESE TREEBANK; RELATIVE ERRORS; SYSTEM COMBINATION; WORD CLUSTERING;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84876787841     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Leo Breiman. 1996. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2):123-140.
2. Peter F. Brown, Peter V. deSouza, Robert L. Mercer, Vincent J. Della Pietra, and Jenifer C. Lai. 1992. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational Linguistics, 18:467- 479. URL http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm? id=176313.176316.
3. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropyinspired parser. In Proceedings of the first conference on North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Michael Collins. 2002. Discriminative training methods for hidden markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1-8. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/ W02-1001.
5. Michael Collins. 2003. Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing. Computational Linguistics, 29(4):589-637.
6. Jesús Giménez and Lluís Màrquez. 2004. Svmtool: A general pos tagger generator based on support vector machines. In In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 43-46.
7. Liang Huang and Kenji Sagae. 2010. Dynamic programming for linear-time incremental parsing. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1077-1086. Association for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/ P10-1110.
8. Zhongqiang Huang, Vladimir Eidelman, and Mary Harper. 2009. Improving a simple bigram hmm part-of-speech tagger by latent annotation and self-training. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Companion Volume: Short Papers, pages 213-216. Association for Computational Linguistics, Boulder, Colorado. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N/N09/N09- 2054.
9. Zhongqiang Huang, Mary Harper, and Wen Wang. 2007. Mandarin part-of-speech tagging and discriminative reranking. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLPCoNLL), pages 1093-1102. Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D07/D07-1117.
10. Reinhard Kneser and Hermann Ney. 1993. Improved clustering techniques for class-based statistical language modeling. In In Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech).
11. Terry Koo, Xavier Carreras, and Michael Collins. 2008. Simple semi-supervised dependency parsing. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 595-603. Association for Computational Linguistics, Columbus, Ohio. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P/P08/P08-1068.
12. Thomas Lavergne, Olivier Cappé, and François Yvon. 2010. Practical very large scale CRFs. pages 504-513. URL http://www.aclweb.org/ anthology/P10-1052.
13. Zhenghua Li, Min Zhang, Wanxiang Che, Ting Liu, Wenliang Chen, and Haizhou Li. 2011. Joint models for Chinese pos tagging and dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1180-1191. Association for Computational Linguistics, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D11-1109.
14. Percy Liang, Michael Collins, and Percy Liang. 2005. Semi-supervised learning for natural language. In Master's thesis, MIT.
15. Takuya Matsuzaki, Yusuke Miyao, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2005. Probabilistic cfg with latent annotations. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '05, pages 75-82. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/ 1219840.1219850.
16. Scott Miller, Jethran Guinness, and Alex Zamanian. 2004. Name tagging with word clusters and discriminative training. In Daniel Marcu Susan Dumais and Salim Roukos, editors, HLT-NAACL 2004: Main Proceedings, pages 337-342. Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
17. Franz Josef Och. 1999. An efficient method for determining bilingual word classes. In Proceedings of the ninth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL '99, pages 71-76. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 3115/977035.977046.
18. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 433-440. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia.
19. Slav Petrov and Dan Klein. 2007. Improved inference for unlexicalized parsing. In Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of the Main Conference, pages 404-411. Association for Computational Linguistics, Rochester, New York.
20. Libin Shen, Giorgio Satta, and Aravind Joshi. 2007. Guided learning for bidirectional sequence classification. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 760-767. Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic. URL http://www.aclweb.org/ anthology/P07-1096.
21. Weiwei Sun. 2010. Word-based and characterbased word segmentation models: Comparison and combination. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010), pages 1211-1219. Coling 2010 Organizing Committee, Beijing, China. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C10- 2139.
22. Weiwei Sun and Jia Xu. 2011. Enhancing Chinese word segmentation using unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 970-979. Association for Computational Linguistics, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D11- 1090.
23. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher D. Manning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - Volume 1, NAACL '03, pages 173-180. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1073445.1073478.
24. Huihsin Tseng, Pichuan Chang, Galen Andrew, Daniel Jurafsky, and Christopher Manning. 2005a. A conditional random field word segmenter. In In Fourth SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing.
25. Huihsin Tseng, Daniel Jurafsky, and Christopher Manning. 2005b. Morphological features help pos tagging of unknown words across language varieties. In The Fourth SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing.
26. MengqiuWang, Kenji Sagae, and Teruko Mitamura. 2006. A fast, accurate deterministic parser for Chinese. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 425-432. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia. URL http://www.aclweb.org/ anthology/P06-1054.
27. Nianwen Xue, Fei Xia, Fu-Dong Chiou, and Martha Palmer. 2005. The penn Chinese treebank: Phrase structure annotation of a large corpus. Natural Language Engineering, 11(2):207-238.
28. Yue Zhang and Stephen Clark. 2008. A tale of two parsers: Investigating and combining graph-based and transition-based dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 562-571. Association for Computational Linguistics, Honolulu, Hawaii. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D08-1059.
29. Yue Zhang and Stephen Clark. 2009. Transitionbased parsing of the Chinese treebank using a global discriminative model. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Parsing Technologies (IWPT'09), pages 162-171. Association for Computational Linguistics, Paris, France. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W09-3825.