Assessing the potential for future first-time slope failures to impact the oil and gas pipeline corridor through the Makarov Mountains, Sakhalin Island, Russia

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 79-88

  Hearn, G ^a   Wise, D ^b   Hart, A ^a   Morgan, C ^a   O'Donnell, N ^c  

^a URS Scott Wilson Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b Sinclair Knight Merz Ltd   (New Zealand)

^c NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FAILURE (MECHANICAL); GAS PLANTS; GROUNDWATER; INVESTMENTS; LANDFORMS; LANDSLIDES; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; NATURAL GASOLINE PLANTS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION; GROUND INVESTIGATION; GROUNDWATER MONITORING; HIGH GROUNDWATER TABLE; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; OIL-AND-GAS PIPELINES; QUALITATIVE EVALUATIONS;

PIPELINES;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; EROSION; GAS PIPELINE; GROUNDWATER; LANDSLIDE; MITIGATION; MONITORING; OIL PIPELINE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC HAZARD; SLOPE FAILURE;

RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SAKHALIN; SAKHALIN ISLAND;

EID: 84455160763     PISSN: 14709236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1144/1470-9236/10-033     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. A national landslide risk management framework for Australia. Journal and News of the Australian Geomechanics Society 2007, 42. AGS.
2. Aleotti P, Chowdhury R. Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 1999, 58:21-44.
3. Barredo JI, Benavides A, Hervás J, van Westen CJ. Comparing heuristic landslide hazard assessment techniques using GIS in the Tirajana basin, Gran Canaria Island, Spain. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2000, 2:9-23.
4. Baynes FJ, Fookes PG, Kennedy JF. Total engineering geology approach applied to railways in the Pilbara, Western Australia. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2005, 64:67-94.
5. Tunnelling-improved contract practices 1978, 79. CIRIA, Construction Industry Research and Information Association Report.
6. Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Nonomura A, Yamanaka M, Dhakal S, Paudyal P. Predictive modelling of rainfall-induced landslide hazard in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal based on weights-of-evidence. Geomorphology 2008, 102:496-510.
7. Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY. Landslide risk assessment and management. An overview. Engineering Geology 2002, 64:65-87.
8. Das I, Sahoo S, van Westen C, Stein A, Hack A. Landslide susceptibility assessment using logistic regression and its comparison with a rock mass classification system, along a road section in the northern Himalayas (India). Geomorphology 2010, 114:627-637.
9. Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage W Z. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. JTC-1 Joint Technical Committee on Landslides and Engineered Slopes. Engineering Geology 2008, 102:85-111.
10. Fookes PG, Baynes FJ. Successful use of the total geology approach using reference conditions for the design and construction of heavy duty railways in the Pilbara, Western Australia. Ground Engineering 2008, 41:39-45.
11. Fookes PG, Hearn GJ, Tollin B, Sweeney M. Aligning oil and gas pipelines through the Makarov Mountains, Sakhalin Island, Russia. Terrain and Geohazard Challenges Facing Onshore Oil and Gas Pipelines 2004, 243-258. Institution of Civil Engineers, London.
12. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 1999, 31:181-216.
13. Hammond R, McCulloch PS. Quantitative Techniques in Geography 1978, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
14. Hansen A, Brunsden D, Prior DB. Landslide hazard analysis. Slope Instability 1984, 523-602. Wiley, New York.
15. Hasegawa S, Takata H, Ogasawara K, Hisada K-I, Gladenkov YB. Neogene foraminiferal biostratigraphy and paleoenvironmental succession in Sakhalin. Journal of Geography 2000, 109:174-186.
16. Hearn GJ, Hart AB, Smith MJ, Paron P, Griffiths J. Geomorphological contributions to landslide risk assessment: theory and practice. Geomorphological Mapping: Methods and Applications 2011, 15:107-148. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Developments in Earth Surface Processes.
17. Hoek E, Bray J. Rock Slope Engineering 1981, 3rd edn, Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London.
18. Jimenez-Peralvarez JD, Irigaray C, El Hamdouni R, Chacon J. Landslide susceptibility mapping in a semi-arid mountain environment: an example from the southern slopes of the Sierra Nevada (Granada, Spain). Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2011, 70:265-278.
19. Koff GL, Balabanov IP. Assessment of landslide hazard for the 'Sakhalin-2' pipeline route. Volume 1 text 1998, GUP Rosstroiizyskaniya, Russian Federation.
20. Koff GL, Kazakov NA. Assessment of avalanche and mudflow hazards along the oil and gas pipeline route ('Sakhalin-2' Project) 1998, SUE Rosstrojizyskaniya, Russian Federation.
21. Komac M. A landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in peri-alpine Slovenia. Geomorphology 2006, 74:17-28.
22. Rossi M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Mondini AC, Peruccacci S. Optimal landslide susceptibility zonation based on multiple forecasts. Geomorphology 2010, 114:129-142.
23. Project specific technical specification for Sakhalin II onshore pipeline design 2002, SEIC, Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Ltd, Russian Federation.
24. Varnes DJ. Landslide Hazard Zonation. A Review of Principles and Practice 1984, International Association of Engineering Geology, Commission on Landslides and Other Mass Movements on Slopes. UNESCO, Paris.
25. Wyllie DC, Mah CW. Rock Slope Engineering: Civil and Mining 2004, 4th edn, Taylor & Francis, London.