Does participatory planning foster the transformation toward more adaptive social-ecological systems?

Ecology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Menzel, Susanne ^a   Buchecker, Matthias ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Comanagement; Participatory planning; Planning costs; Qualitative research; Social capital; Social learning; Time requirements

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; COGNITION; COMANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LEARNING; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PLANNING PROCESS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RIVER ENGINEERING; SOCIAL CAPITAL; STAKEHOLDER;

SWITZERLAND;

EID: 84876753322     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05154-180113     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Armitage, D., M. Marschke, and R. Plummer. 2008. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 18:86-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
2. Arnold, J. S., M. Koro-Ljungberg, and W.-L. Bartels. 2012. Power and conflict in adaptive management: analyzing the discourse of riparian management on public lands. Ecology and Society 17(1): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04636-170119
3. Arnold, M., B. Schwarzwälder, K. Beer-Tóth, M. Zbinden, and K. Baumgart. 2009. Mehrwert naturnaher wasserläufe. untersuchung zur zahlungsbereitschaft mit besonderer berücksichtigung der erschliessung für den langsamverkehr. Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU), Bern, Switzerland.
4. Birner, R., and H. Wittmer. 2003. Using social capital to create political capital: how do local communities gain political influence? A theoretical approach and empirical evidence from Thailand. Pages 291-334 in N. Dolšak and E. Ostrom, editors. The commons in the new millenium. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
5. Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. Pages 241-258 in J. Richardson. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
6. Bullock, R., and K. Hanna. 2007. Community forestry:mitigating or creating conflict in British Columbia? Society & Natural Resources 21:77-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0894-1920701561007
7. BUWAL/BWG. 2003. Leitbild fliessgewässer schweiz. Für eine nachhaltige gewässerpolitik. Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU), Bern, Switzerland.
8. Carr, D. S., S. W. Selin, and M. A. Schuett. 1998. Managing public forests: understanding the role of collaborative planning. Environmental Management 22:767-776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002679900146
9. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94:S95-S120.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228943
10. Coyne, I. T. 1997. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing 26:623-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x
11. Cundill, G., and C. Fabricius. 2010. Monitoring the governance dimension of natural resource co-management. Ecology and Society 15(1): 15. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art15/
12. Dorcey, A., and T. McDaniels. 2001. Great expectations, mixed results: trends in citizen involvement in Canadian environmental governance. Pages 247-302 in E. Parson, editor. Governing the environment: persistent challenges, uncertain innovations. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
13. Garmendia, E., and S. Stagl. 2010. Public participation for sustainability and social learning: concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecological Economics 69:1712-1722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.027
14. Gee, J. P. 2005. An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. Routledge, New York, New York, USA.
15. Höppner, C., J. Frick, and M. Buchecker. 2007. Assessing psycho-social effects of participatory landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 83:196-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.005
16. Hostmann, M., and A. Knutti. 2009. Befreite wasser - entdeckungsreise in revitalisierte flusslandschaften der schweiz. Rotpunktverlag, Zurich, Swizterland.
17. Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems - a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65:412-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0194436-9908976071
18. Kuhlicke, C., A. Steinführer, C. Begg, C. Bianchizza, M. Bründl, M. Buchecker, B. De Marchi, M. Di Masso Tarditti, C. Höppner, B. Komac, L. Lemkow, J. Luther, S. McCarthy, L. Pellizzoni, O. Renn, A. Scolobig, M. Supramaniam, S. Tapsell, G. Wachinger, G. Walker, R. Whittle, M. Zorn, and H. Faulkner. 2011. Perspectives on social capacity building for natural hazards: outlining an emerging field of research and practice in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy 14:804-814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.05.001
19. Leach, W. D., N. W. Perkey, and P. A. Sabatier. 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21:645-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.10079
20. Leach, W. D., and P. A. Sabatier. 2005. Are trust and social capital the keys to success? Watershed partnerships in California and Washington. Pages 233-257 in P. A. Sabatier, W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock, editors. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
21. Mostert, E., M. Craps, and C. Pahl-Wostl. 2008. Social learning: the key to integrated water resources management? Water International 33:293-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02508060802275757
22. Mostert, E., C. Pahl-Wostl, Y. Rees, B. Searle, D. Tàbara, and J. Tippett. 2007. Social learning in European river-basin management: barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecology and Society 12(1):16. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art19/.
23. Muro, M., and P. Jeffrey. 2008. A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51:325-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640560801977190
24. Muro, M., and P. Jeffrey. 2012. Time to talk? How the structure of dialog processes shapes stakeholder learning in participatory water resources management. Ecology and Society 17(1): 3.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04476-170103
25. Newig, J., and O. Fritsch. 2009. Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance 19:197-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.509
26. Olsson, P., C. Folke, and F. Berkes. 2004. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 34:75-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7
27. Pahl-Wostl, C. 2009. A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change 19:354-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
28. Pahl-Wostl, C., J. Sendzimir, P. Jeffrey, J. Aerts, G. Berkamp, and K. Cross. 2007. Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society 12 (2): 30.[online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art30/.
29. Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Second edition. Sage, Newbury Park, California, USA.
30. Rauschmayer F., J. Paavola, and H. Wittmer. 2009. European governance of natural resources and participation in a multilevel context: an editorial. Environmental Policy and Governance 19:141-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.504
31. Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141:2417-2431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
32. Rodela, R., G. Cundill, and A. E. J. Wals. 2012. An analysis of the methodological underpinnings of social learning research in natural resource management. Ecological Economics 77:16-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.032
33. Sabatier, P.A., W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock, editors. 2005. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
34. Sheppard, S. R. J., and M. Meitner. 2005. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management 207:171-187.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.032
35. Stringer, L. C., A. J. Dougill, E. Fraser, K. Hubacek, C. Prell, and M. S. Reed. 2006. Unpacking participation in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society 11(2): 39.[online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art39/.
36. Wagner, C. L., and M. E. Fernandez-Gimenez. 2008. Does community-based collaborative resource management increase social capital? Society & Natural Resources 21:324-344.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920701864344
37. Wagner, C. L., and M. E. Fernandez-Gimenez. 2009. Effects of community-based collaborative group characteristics on social capital. Environmental Management 44:632-645.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9347-z
38. Waitt, G. 2010. Doing Foucauldian discourse analysis - revealing social identities. Pages 217-240 in I. Hay, editor. Qualitative methods in human geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
39. Zaugg, M. 2003. Mehr raum den fliesharpgewässern: more space for the rivers - the path to a sustainable flood prevention. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 12:201-207.