Managing invasive species amidst high uncertainty and novelty

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 255-256

  Larson, Brendon M H ^a   Kueffer, Christoph ^b   Brock, Antje ^c   Edwards, Peter ^c   Gross, Matthias ^c   Hall, Marcus ^c   Higgs, Eric ^c   Jentsch, Anke ^c   Jeschke, Jonathan M ^c   Klein, Alexandra Maria ^c   Wynne, Brian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LETTER;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; INTRODUCED SPECIES;

EID: 84876736277     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.013     Document Type: Letter

References (10)

1. Davis M., et al. Don't judge species on their origins. Nature 2011, 474:153-154.
2. Simberloff D., et al. Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:58-66.
3. Harremoës P., et al. Late Lessons From Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896-2000 2002, European Environment Agency.
4. Stirling A. Keep it complex. Nature 2010, 468:1029-1031.
5. Liu S., et al. Incorporating uncertainty and social values in managing invasive alien species: a deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach. Biol. Invasions 2011, 13:2323-2337.
6. Hulme P.E. Weed risk assessment: a way forward or a waste of time?. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 49:10-19.
7. Walther G-R., et al. Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:686-693.
8. Sarewitz D. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ. Sci. Policy 2004, 7:385-403.
9. Pielke R.A. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics 2007, Cambridge University Press.
10. Turnhout E., et al. Listen to the voices of experience. Nature 2012, 488:454-455.