An assessment of hierarchical linear modeling in international business, management, and marketing

International Business Review

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 663-677

  Erkan Ozkaya, H ^a   Dabas, Chitra ^a   Kolev, Kalin ^b   Hult, G Tomas M ^c   Dahlquist, Steven H ^d   Manjeshwar, Sonia Arun ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM); Multilevel modeling (MLM); Nested data analysis; Nested models; Random effects models; Statistical methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876719283     PISSN: 09695931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arregle J., Hébert L., Beamish P.W. Mode of international entry: The advantages of multilevel methods. Management International Review 2006, 46(5):597-619.
2. Bergen M.S., Dutta S., Walker O.C. Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories. Journal of Marketing 1992, 56(3):1-24.
3. Bliese P.D., Ployhart R.E. Growth modeling using r&om coefficient models: Model building, testing, & illustrations. Organizational Research Methods 2002, 5(4):362.
4. Bryk A.S., Raudenbush S.W. Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: Applications and data analysis methods 1992, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA. 1st ed.
5. Combs J.G., Ketchen D.J. Why do firms use franchising as an entrepreneurial strategy?: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management 2003, 29(3):443-465.
6. Eisenhardt K.M. Agency theory: An assessment & review. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14(1):57-74.
7. Emerson R. Toward a theory of value in social exchange. Social exchange theory 1987, 11-46. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. K. Cook (Ed.).
8. Erez M., Gati E. A dynamic, multi-level model of culture: From the micro level of the individual to the macro level of a global culture. Applied Psychology: An International Review 2004, 53(4):583-598.
9. Hofmann D.A. An overview of the logic & rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management 1997, 23(6):723.
10. Hult G.T.M., Ketchen D.J., Griffithl D.A., Finnegan C.A., Tracy Gonzalez-Padron T., Harmancioglu H., et al. Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: Assessment and guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies 2008, 39(6):1027-1044.
11. Jackson G., Deeg R. Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity & its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies 2008, 39(4):540-557.
12. K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Vol. Eds.), (2000). Multilevel theory, research, & methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, & new directions. Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology Frontiers Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Klein K.J., Dansereau F., Hall R.J. Levels issues in theory development, data collection, & analysis. Academy of Management Review 1994, 19(2):195-230.
14. Kreft I.G.G., Leeuw J.D., Aiken L.S. The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1995, 30(1):1-21.
15. Leung K., Bhagat R.S., Buchan N.R., Erez M., Gibson C.B. Culture & international business: Recent advances & their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies 2005, 36(4):357-378.
16. Longford N.T. To center or not to center. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter 1989, 1(3):7.
17. Magnusson P., Westjohn S.A., Zdravkovic S. What? I thought Samsung was Japanese: Accurate or not, perceived country of origin matters. International Marketing Review 2011, 28(5):454-472.
18. March J.G., Sutton R.I. Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organization Science 1997, 8(6):698-706.
19. Martín O.M., Cerviño J. Towards an integrative framework of brand country of origin recognition determinants: A cross-classified hierarchical model. International Marketing Review 2011, 28(6):530-558.
20. Mill J.S. A system of logic 1974 [1843], University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
21. Palmatier R.W., Gopalakrishna S., Houston M.B. Returns on business-to-business relationship marketing investments: Strategies for leveraging profits. Marketing Science 2006, 25(5):477-496.
22. Paulson, D. J. F. (2009). Stakeholder decision making influence and stakeholder well-being in nursing homes: The case of employees and customers. Doctoral dissertation, Human Resources and Industrial Relations, University of Minesota.
23. Plewis I. Comment on "centering" predictors. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter 1989, 1(3):6-11.
24. Raudenbush S.W. Centering predictors in multilevel analysis: Choices & consequences. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter 1989, 1(2):10-12.
25. Raudenbush S.W. A response to Longford & Plewis. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter 1989, 1(3):8-10.
26. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Empirical Bayes meta-analysis. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics 1985, 10(2):75-98.
27. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications & data analysis methods 2002, Sage Publication Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
28. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S., Cheong Y.F., Congdon R. HLM 6: Hierarchical linear & non linear modeling 2004, Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL.
29. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions & organizations. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA.
30. Sharma S. Policies concerning decisions related to quality level. International Journal of Production Economics 2010, 125(1):146-152.
31. Sharma S. Development of supplier relationship including cost of defectives in the cyclic production. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations 2012, 10.1080/09537287.2012.666866.
32. Shook C.L., Ketchen D.J., Hult G.T.M., Kacmar K.M. Research notes & commentaries: An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal 2004, 25(4):397-404.
33. Short J.C., Ketchen D.J., Bennett N., du Toit M. An examination of firm, industry, and time effects on performance using random coefficients modeling. Organizational Research Methods 2006, 9(3):259.
34. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader 2004, 56-65. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M.J. Hatch, M. Schultz (Eds.).
35. Tasoluk B., Dröge C., Calantone R.J. Interpreting interrelations across multiple levels in HGLM models: An application in international marketing research. International Marketing Review 2011, 28(1):34-56.
36. Woltman H., Feldstain A., MacKay J.C., Rocchi M. An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 2012, 8(1):52-69.