Effects of Colon Capsule Endoscopy on Medical Decision Making in Patients With Incomplete Colonoscopies

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Alarcón Fernández, Onofre ^a   Ramos, Laura ^a   Adrián de Ganzo, Zaida ^a   Gimeno García, Antonio Zebenzuy ^a   Nicolás Pérez, David ^a   Jiménez, Alejandro ^a   Quintero, Enrique ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE CANARIAS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Colon Capsule Endoscopy; Incomplete Colonoscopy; Medical Decision Making

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT; ABDOMINAL PAIN; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARIUM ENEMA; BRADYCARDIA; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPE; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON LAVAGE; COLON RESECTION; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CROHN DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NAUSEA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POLYPECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STOMACH EMPTYING; TELECONSULTATION; VOMITING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84876705456     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1296-1308.
2. Imperiale T.F., Wagner D.R., Lin C.Y., et al. Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2003, 139:959-965.
3. Lieberman D.A., Weiss D.G., Bond J.H., et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer: Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000, 343:162-168.
4. Gupta M., Holub J.L., Eisen G. Do indication and demographics for colonoscopy affect completion? A large national database evaluation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010, 22:620-627.
5. Neerincx M., Terhaar sive Droste J.S., Mulder C.J., et al. Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy 2010, 42:730-735.
6. Loffeld R.J., van der Putten A.B. The completion rate of colonoscopy in normal daily practice: factors associated with failure. Digestion 2009, 80:267-270.
7. Shah H.A., Paszat L.F., Saskin R., et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007, 132:2297-2303.
8. Bowles C.J., Leicester R., Romaya C., et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?. Gut 2004, 53:277-283.
9. Gay G., Delvaux M. Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument. Endoscopy 2007, 39:788-792.
10. Suzuki T., Matsushima M., Tsukune Y., et al. Double-balloon endoscopy versus magnet-imaging enhanced colonoscopy for difficult colonoscopies, a randomized study. Endoscopy 2012, 44:38-42.
11. Spada C., Hassan C., Munoz-Navas M., et al. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 74:581-589.
12. Galmiche J.P., Coron E., Sacher-Huvelin S. Recent developments in capsule endoscopy. Gut 2008, 57:695-703.
13. Spada C., Hassan C., Sturniolo G.C., et al. Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of colon capsule endoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2011, 43:251-258.
14. Schoofs N., Devière J., Van Gossum A. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 2006, 38:971-977.
15. Eliakim R., Fireman Z., Gralnek I.M., et al. Evaluation of the PillCam colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy 2006, 38:963-970.
16. Gay G., Delvaux M., Frederic M., et al. Could the colonic capsule PillCam Colon be clinically useful for selecting patients who deserve a complete colonoscopy? Results of clinical comparison with colonoscopy in the perspective of colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:1076-1086.
17. Van Gossum A., Munoz-Navas M., Fernandez-Urien I., et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med 2009, 361:264-270.
18. Rokkas T., Papaxoinis K., Triantafyllou K., et al. A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 71:792-798.
19. Spada C., Riccioni M.E., Petruzziello L., et al. The new PillCam Colon capsule: difficult colonoscopy? No longer a problem?. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 68:807-808.
20. Triantafyllou K., Tsibouris P., Kalantzis C., et al. PillCam Colon capsule endoscopy does not always complement incomplete colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:572-576.
21. Parra-Blanco A., Nicolas-Perez D., Gimeno-Garcia A., et al. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006, 12:6161-6166.
22. Lai E.J., Calderwood A.H., Doros G., et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:620-625.
23. Iobagiu S., Ciobanu L., Pascu O. Colon capsule endoscopy: a new method of investigating the large bowel. J Gastrointestinal Liver Dis 2008, 17:347-352.
24. Wong T.Y., Lam W.W., So N.M., et al. Air-inflated magnetic resonance colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy: comparison with intraoperative findings, pathology specimens, and follow-up conventional colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:56-63.
25. Spada C., Hassan C., Ingrosso M., et al. A new regimen of bowel preparation for PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a pilot study. Dig Liver Dis 2011, 43:300-304.
26. Leighton J.A., Rex D.K. A grading scale to evaluate colon cleansing for the PillCam Colon capsule: a reliability study. Endoscopy 2011, 43:123-127.
27. Sacher-Huvelin S., Coron E., Gaudric M., et al. Colon capsule endoscopy vs. colonoscopy in patients at average or increased risk of colorectal cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010, 32:1145-1153.
28. Spada C., Hassan C., Marmo R., et al. Meta-analysis shows colon capsule endoscopy is effective in detecting colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010, 8:516-522.
29. Delvaux M., Papanikolaou I.S., Fassler I., et al. Esophageal capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected esophageal disease: double blinded comparison with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and assessment of interobserver variability. Endoscopy 2008, 40:16-22.
30. Johnson C.D., Chen M.H., Toledano A.Y., et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1207-1217.
31. Fletcher J.G., Chen M.H., Herman B.A., et al. Can radiologist training and testing ensure high performance in CT colonography? Lessons from the National CT Colonography Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 195:117-125.