G2c adoption of e-government in Malaysia: Trust, perceived risk and political self-efficacy

International Journal of Electronic Government Research

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 57-72

  Hussein, Ramlah ^a   Mohamed, Norshidah ^a   Ahlan, Abdul Rahman ^a   Mahmud, Murni ^a   Aditiawarman, Umar ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

G2C adoption; Perceived risk; Political self efficacy; TAM; Trust

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT; G2C ADOPTION; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; PERCEIVED RISK; SELF EFFICACY; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TRUST;

E-GOVERNMENT;

EID: 84876647044     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Al-Adawi, Z., Yousafzai, S., & Pallister, J. (2005). Conceptual Model of Citizen Adoption of e-Government. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Innovation in Information Technology (pp. 1-10).
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and Risk in e-Government Adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 1-15. doi:10.1016/j. jsis.2007.12.002
4. Carter, L. (2008). E-government Diffusion: A Comparison of Adoption Constructs. Transforming Government: People . Process and Policy, 2(3), 147-161.
5. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2004). Citizen Adoption of Electronic Government Initiatives. Paper Presented at Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
6. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The Utilization of e- Government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors. Information Systems Journal, 15, 5-25. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
7. Chen, L., Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2001). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39, 705-719. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00127-6
8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13, 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
9. Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 19-45. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
10. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11. Gardner, C., & Amoroso, D. L. (2004). Development of an instrument to measure the acceptance of internet technology by consumers. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
12. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: an Integrated Model. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
13. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2002). Managing User Trust in e-Services. e-Service Journal, 2(1).
14. Gronlund, A., & Horan, T. A. (2004). Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 713-729.
15. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Hosmer, L. T. (1995). The Connection Link between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 213-237.
17. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Tractinsky, N. (1999). Consumer Trust in an Internet Store: A Cross-Cultural Validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(2).
18. Klopping, I. M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the technology acceptance model and tasktechnology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 22(1).
19. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: an Integrative Approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334-359. doi:10.1287/ isre.13.3.334.81
20. Mirchandani, D. A., Johnson, J. H., & Joshi, K. (2008). Perspectives of Citizens towards e-Government in Thailand and Indonesia: A Multigroup Analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4). doi:10.1007/s10796-008-9102-7
21. Moore, G., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2, 173-191. doi:10.1287/ isre.2.3.192
22. Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. The American Political Science Review, 85(4). doi:10.2307/1963953
23. Parent, M., Vandebeek, C. R., & Gemino, A. C. (2004). Building Citizen Trust through e-Government. Paper Presented at Proceedings of the 37th Hawaiian International Conference on Systems Sciences.
24. Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134.
25. Phang, C. W., Sutanto, J., Li, Y., & Kankanhalli, A. (2005). Senior Citizens' Adoption of E-government: In Quest of the Antecedents of Perceived Usefulness. Paper Presented at Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
26. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
27. Rotter, L. B. (1971). Generalized Expectations for Interpersonal Trust. The American Psychologist, 26(5), 443-452. doi:10.1037/h0031464
28. Tan, C. W., & Pan, S. L. (2003). Managing etransformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 269-281. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000479
29. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
30. Wang, Y.-S. (2002). The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: an empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 333-352. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2003.08.005
31. Wang, Y.-S., & Liao, Y.-W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: a validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717-733. doi:10.1016/j.giq. 2007.06.002
32. Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P., & Rose, G. (2002). Encouraging Citizen Adoption of e- Government by Building Trust. Electronic Markets, 12(2), 157-162. doi:10.1080/101967802320245929
33. Welch, E. W., & Hinnant, C. (2003). Internet Use, Transparency and Interactivity Effects on Trust in Government. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HI.
34. Wu, I. L., & Chen, J. L. (2005). An Extension of Trust and TAM Model with TPB in the Initial Adoption of Online Tax: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 784-808. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003
35. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002). Service Quality Delivery Through Web Sites: A Critical Review of Extant Knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 362-275. doi:10.1177/009207002236911
36. Zimmerman, M. A. (1989). The Relationship between Political Efficacy and Citizen Participation: Construct Validation Studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(3), 554-566. doi:10.1207/ s15327752jpa5303-12
37. Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.