Differential Contributions of Vision, Touch and Muscle Proprioception to the Coding of Hand Movements

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Blanchard, Caroline ^a   Roll, Régine ^a   Roll, Jean Pierre ^b   Kavounoudias, Anne ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EYE HAND COORDINATION; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; MUSCLE PROPRIOCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOUCH; VELOCITY; VIBRATION; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; HAND; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SKELETAL MUSCLE; STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876528151     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062475     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Sherrington C (1906) The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven: Yale University Press.
2. Gibson JJ, (1954) The visual perception of objective motion and subjective movement. Psychological Review 61: 304-314.
3. Lee D, Lishman J, (1975) Visual proprioceptive control of stance. J Human Mouvement Study 1: 87-95.
4. Brandt T, Koenig E, Dichgans J, (1972) Perception of Self-Rotation (circular-Vection) Induced by Optokinetic Stimuli. Pflugers Arch 332: R98.
5. Grill SE, Hallett M, (1995) Velocity sensitivity of human muscle spindle afferents and slowly adapting type II cutaneous mechanoreceptors. J Physiol-London 489: 593-602.
6. Edin BB, (2004) Quantitative analyses of dynamic strain sensitivity in human skin mechanoreceptors. J Neurophysiol 92: 3233-3243 doi:10.1152/jn.00628.2004.
7. Aimonetti J-M, Roll J-P, Hospod V, Ribot-Ciscar E (2012) Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans. Experimental Brain Research. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22766849. Accessed 26 July 2012.
8. Collins DF, Refshauge KM, Gandevia SC, (2000) Sensory integration in the perception of movements at the human metacarpophalangeal joint. J Physiol-London 529: 505-515 doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00505.x.
9. Collins DF, Refshauge KM, Todd G, Gandevia SC, (2005) Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. J Neurophysiol 94: 1699-1706 doi:10.1152/jn.00191.2005.
10. Blanchard C, Roll R, Roll J-P, Kavounoudias A, (2011) Combined contribution of tactile and proprioceptive feedback to hand movement perception. Brain Res 1382: 219-229 doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.066.
11. Cordo PJ, Horn J-L, Kuenster D, Cherry A, Bratt A, et al. (2011) Contributions of skin and muscle afferent input to movement sense in the human hand. J Neurophysiol 105: 1879-1888 doi:10.1152/jn.00201.2010.
12. Tardy-Gervet M, Gilhodes JC, Roll J-P, (1986) Interactions between visual and muscular information in illusions of limb movement. Behav Brain Res 20: 161-174 doi:10.1016/0166-4328(86)90001-X.
13. Rossetti Y, Desmurget M, Prablanc C, (1995) Vectorial Coding of Movement- Vision, Proprioception, or Both. J Neurophysiol 74: 457-463.
14. Van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Van der Gon JJD, (1999) Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81: 1355-1364.
15. Hagura N, Takei T, Hirose S, Aramaki Y, Matsumura M, et al. (2007) Activity in the posterior parietal cortex mediates visual dominance over kinesthesia. J Neurosci 27: 7047-7053 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0970-07.2007.
16. Guerraz M, Provost S, Narison R, Brugnon A, Virolle S, et al. (2012) Integration of visual and proprioceptive afferents in kinesthesia. Neuroscience 223: 258-268 doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.059.
17. Hlavacka F, Mergner T, Bolha B, (1996) Human self-motion perception during translatory vestibular and proprioceptive stimulation. Neurosci Lett 210: 83-86 doi:10.1016/0304-3940(96)12667-7.
18. Becker W, Nasios G, Raab S, Jurgens R, (2002) Fusion of vestibular and podokinesthetic information during self-turning towards instructed targets. Exp Brain Res 144: 458-474 doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1053-5.
19. Maurer C, Mergner T, Peterka RJ, (2006) Multisensory control of human upright stance. Exp Brain Res 171: 231-250 doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0256-y.
20. Smetanin BN, Kozhina GV, Popov AK, (2012) Effects of Near-Threshold Stimulation of the Vestibular Apparatus on Postural Responses Evoked by Displacements of the Visualized Surrounding. Neurophysiology 43: 377-383.
21. Vidal M, Buelthoff HH, (2010) Storing upright turns: how visual and vestibular cues interact during the encoding and recalling process. Exp Brain Res 200: 37-49 doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1980-5.
22. Kavounoudias A, Roll R, Roll J-P, (2001) Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation. J Physiol-London 532: 869-878 doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0869e.x.
23. Juergens R, Becker W, (2006) Perception of angular displacement without landmarks: evidence for Bayesian fusion of vestibular, optokinetic, podokinesthetic, and cognitive information. Exp Brain Res 174: 528-543 doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0486-7.
24. Roll JP, Gilhodes JC, Tardy-Gervet MF, (1980) Perceptive and Motor Effects of Muscle Vibrations in Normal Human- Detection of Response of Antagonist Muscles. Arch Ital Biol 118: 51-71.
25. Feldman A, Latash M, (1982) Inversions of Vibration-Induced Sensory-Motor Events Caused by Supraspinal Influences in Man. Neurosci Lett 31: 147-151 doi:10.1016/0304-3940(82)90107-0.
26. Calvin-Figuiere S, Romaiguere P, Gilhodes J-C, Roll JP, (1999) Antagonist motor responses correlate with kinesthetic illusions induced by tendon vibration. Exp Brain Res 124: 342-350 doi:10.1007/s002210050631.
27. Breugnot C, Bueno MA, Renner M, Ribot-Ciscar E, Aimonetti JM, et al. (2006) Mechanical discrimination of hairy fabrics from neurosensorial criteria. Text Res J 76: 835-846 doi:10.1177/0040517506069349.
28. Duclos C, Roll R, Kavounoudias A, Roll JP, Forget R, (2007) Vibration-induced post-effects: A means to improve postural asymmetry in lower leg amputees? Gait Posture 26: 595-602 doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.005.
29. Stein BE, Stanford TR, Ramachandran R, et al. (2009) Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternative criteria, models, and inverse effectiveness. Exp Brain Res 198: 113-126 doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1880-8.
30. Romaiguere P, Calvin S, Roll JP, (2005) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the sensorimotor cortex alters kinaesthesia. Neuroreport 16: 693-697 doi:10.1097/00001756-200505120-00008.
31. Casini L, Romaiguere P, Ducorps A, Schwartz D, Anton JL, et al. (2006) Cortical correlates of illusory hand movement perception in humans: A MEG study. Brain Res 1121: 200-206 doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.124.
32. Romaiguere P, Anton JL, Roth M, Casini L, Roll JP, (2003) Motor and parietal cortical areas both underlie kinaesthesia. Cognit Brain Res 16: 74-82 doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00221-5.
33. Naito E, Roland PE, Grefkes C, Choi HJ, Eickhoff S, et al. (2005) Dominance of the right hemisphere and role of area 2 in human kinesthesia. J Neurophysiol 93: 1020-1034 doi:10.1152/jn.00637.2004.
34. Kavounoudias A, Roll JP, Anton J-L, Nazarian B, Roth M, et al. (2008) Proprio-tactile integration for kinesthetic perception: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 46: 567-575 doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.002.
35. Miscio G, Pisano F, Del Conte C, Pianca D, Colombo R, et al. (2001) The shortening reaction of forearm muscles: the influence of central set. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 884-894 doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00468-0.
36. Katz R, Rondot P, (1978) Muscle reaction to passive shortening in normal man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 45: 90-99 doi:10.1016/0013-4694(78)90345-0.
37. Westphal PC, (1877) Unterschenkelphänomen und Nervendehnung. Archiv f Psychiatrie 7: 666-670 doi:10.1007/BF02041882.
38. Clément G, Jacquin T, Berthoz A (1985) Habituation of postural readjustements induced by motion of visual scenes. In: Igarashi B, editor. Vestibular and Visual Control on Posture and Locomotor Equilibrium. Houston. 99-104.
39. Peterka R, Benolken M, (1995) Role of Somatosensory and Vestibular Cues in Attenuating Visually Induced Human Postural Sway. Exp Brain Res 105: 101-110.
40. Van der Kooij H, Jacobs R, Koopman B, Van der Helm F, (2001) An adaptive model of sensory integration in a dynamic environment applied to human stance control. Biol Cybern 84: 103-115 doi:10.1007/s004220000196.
41. Mergner T, Schweigart G, Maurer C, Blumle A, (2005) Human postural responses to motion of real and virtual visual environments under different support base conditions. Exp Brain Res 167: 535-556 doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0065-3.
42. Stevenson IH, Fernandes HL, Vilares I, Wei K, Koerding KP (2009) Bayesian Integration and Non-Linear Feedback Control in a Full-Body Motor Task. PLoS Comput Biol 5. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000629.
43. Dokka K, Kenyon RV, Keshner EA, (2009) Influence of visual scene velocity on segmental kinematics during stance. Gait Posture 30: 211-216 doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.001.
44. Dokka K, Kenyon RV, Keshner EA, Kording KP (2010) Self versus Environment Motion in Postural Control. PLoS Comput Biol 6. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000680.
45. Orban G, Dewolf J, Maes H, (1984) Factors Influencing Velocity Coding in the Human Visual-System. Vision Res 24: 33-39 doi:10.1016/0042-6989(84)90141-X.
46. Orban GA, Dupont P, De Bruyn B, Vandenberghe R, Rosier A, et al. (1998) Human brain activity related to speed discrimination tasks. Exp Brain Res 122: 9-22 doi:10.1007/s002210050486.
47. Collins J, Roppolo J, (1980) A Comparison of Human Tactile Stimulus Velocity Discrimination with the Ability of S-I Cortical-Neurons in Awake Rhesus-Monkeys to Signal the Same Velocity Differences Before and After Non-Anesthetic Doses of Pentobarbital. Brain Res 198: 307-321 doi:10.1016/0006-8993(80)90746-5.
48. Essick G, Edin B, (1995) Receptor Encoding of Moving Tactile Stimuli in Humans.2. the Mean Response of Individual Low-Threshold Mechanoreceptors to Motion Across the Receptive-Field. J Neurosci 15: 848-864.
49. Burke D, Hagbarth K, Lofstedt L, Wallin B, (1976) Responses of Human Muscle-Spindle Endings to Vibration During Isometric Contraction. J Physiol-London 261: 695-711.
50. Roll JP, Vedel JP, (1982) Kinesthetic Role of Muscle Afferents in Man, Studied by Tendon Vibration and Microneurography. Exp Brain Res 47: 177-190.
51. Roll JP, Vedel JP, Ribot E, (1989) Alteration of Proprioceptive Messages Induced by Tendon Vibration in Man- a Microneurographic Study. Exp Brain Res 76: 213-222.
52. Nougier V, Bard C, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Cole J, et al. (1996) Control of single-joint movements in deafferented patients: Evidence for amplitude coding rather than position control. Exp Brain Res 109: 473-482.
53. Stenneken P, Prinz W, Bosbach S, Aschersleben G, (2006) Visual proprioception in the timing of movements: evidence from deafferentation. Neuroreport 17: 545-548 doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000209013.01470.f8.