Evaluating the supports intensity scale as a potential assessment instrument for resource allocation for persons with intellectual disability

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 2056-2063

  Chou, Yueh Ching ^a   Lee, Yue Chune ^a   Chang, Shu Chuan ^b   Yu, Amy Pei Lung ^c  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Syinlu Social Welfare Foundation   (Taiwan)

^c Qi Zhi Vocational Training Center   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Intellectual disability; Resource allocation; SIS; Support Intensity Scale; Taiwan

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LAWTON INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING SCALE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SUPPORTS INTENSITY SCALE; TAIWAN;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 84876459303     PISSN: 08914222     EISSN: 18733379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.013     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bossaert G., Kuppens S., Buntinx W., Molleman C., Van den Abeele A., Maes B. Usefulness of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) for persons with other than intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2009, 30(6):1306-1316.
2. Chou Y.C., Chiao C., Fu L.Y. Health status, social support, and quality of life among family carers of adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in Taiwan. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 2011, 36(1):73-79.
3. Chou Y.-C, Pu C., Kröger T., Lee W., Chang S. Outcomes of a new residential scheme for adults with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan: A 2-year follow-up. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2011, 55:823-831.
4. Davison H. Book review: The Supports Intensity Scale. [Book Review]. [Authors: Thompson, J. R., Bryant, B. R., Campbell, E. M., Craig, E. M., Hughes, C. M., Rotholz, D. A., et al. Title: The Supports Intensity Scale. Year: 2004. Other Info: American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington DC, 2004. 128pp., $128]. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2005, 49(8):636.
5. Department of Social Affairs, Ministry of Interior, Taiwan (2012). Subsidy scheme for homecare services use. February 25, 2013, retrieved from. http://www.moi.gov.tw/dsa/news_content.aspx%3Fsn=6507.
6. Holmes S. Complex Chinese (Taiwanese) translatin of the supports intensity scale. International implementation of the supports intensity scale 2008, 9-10. AAIID, Washington. R.L. Schalock, J.R. Thompson, M.J. Tassé (Eds.).
7. Jenaro C., Cruz M., Perez M.C., Flores N.E., Vega V. Utilization of the Supports Intensity Scale with psychiatric populations: Psychometric properties and utility for service delivery planning. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 2011, 25(5):e9-e17.
8. Lawton M.P., Brody E. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969, 9:179-186.
9. Mahoney F.I., Barthel D.W. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medicine Journal 1965, 14:61-65.
10. Morin D., Cobigo V. Reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (French version). Journal Information 2009, 47(1):24-30.
11. Smit W., Sabbe B., Prinzie P. Reliability and validity of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) measured in adults with physical disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2011, 23(4):277-287.
12. Smith G., Fortune J. The Supports Intensity Scale and resource allocation. Resource allocation and the Supports Intensity Scale: Four papers on issues and approaches 2008, 3-6. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Washington, DC, Retrieved from http://siswebsite.org/galleries/default-file/SISWPResourceAllocation.pdf. J.R. Schalock, J.R. Thompson, M.J. Tassé (Eds.).
13. Thompson J.R., Bryant B.R., Campbell E.M., Craig E.M., Hughes C.M., Rotholz D.A., et al. Supports Intensity Scale: Users' manual 2004, American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington.
14. Thompson J.R., Hughes C., Schalock R.L., Silverman W., Tassé M.J., Bryant, et al. Integrating supports in assessment and planning. Mental Retardation 2002, 40(5):390-405.
15. Thompson J.R., Tassé M.J., McLaughlin C.A. Interrater reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS). Journal Information 2008, 113(3):231-237.
16. Verdugo M.A., Arias B., Ibáñez A., Schalock R.L. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS). American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2010, 115(6):496-503.
17. Weber L., Stern J. Washington's residential resource allocation model. Resource allocation and the Supports Intensity Scale: Four papers on issues and approaches 2008, 11-18. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Washington, DC, Retrieved from http://siswebsite.org/galleries/default-file/SISWPResourceAllocation.pdf. J.R. Schalock, J.R. Thompson, M.J. Tassé (Eds.).
18. Wehmeyer M., Chapman T.E., Little T.D., Thompson J.R., Schalock R., Tassé M.J. Efficacy of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) to predict extraordinary support needs. Journal Information 2009, 114(1):3-14.
19. Weiss J.A., Lunsky Y., Tassé M.J., Durbin J. Support for the construct validity of the Supports Intensity Scale based on clinician rankings of need. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2009, 30(5):933-941.