Response to commentaries on our paper: Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling

NeuroImage

Volumn 75, Issue , 2013, Pages 279-281

  Lohmann, Gabriele ^a   Müller, Karsten ^a   Turner, Robert ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; CALCULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC CAUSAL MODELLING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 84876453343     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.041     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Bang-Jensen J., Gutin G., Yeo A. When the greedy algorithm fails. Discrete Optim. 2004, 1(2):121-127.
2. Box G. Sampling and Bayes' inference in scientific modelling and robustness. J.R. Stat. Soc. 1980, 143(Part A):383-430.
3. Breakspear M. Dynamic and stochastic models of neuroimaging data: A comment on Lohmann et al. Neuroimage. 2013, 75:270-274.
4. Casella G., Giron F., Martinez M., Moreno E. Consistency of Bayesian procedures for variable selection. Ann. Stat. 2009, 37(3):1207-1228.
5. Daunizeau J., Friston K., Kiebel S. Variational Bayesian identification and prediction of stochastic nonlinear dynamic causal models. Physica D 2009, 238:2089-2118.
6. Evans M., Moshonov H. Checking for prior-data conflict. Bayesian Anal. 2006, 1(4):893-914.
7. Friston K., Penny W. Post hoc Bayesian model selection. NeuroImage 2011, 56(4). pp. 2089-2099.
8. Friston K., Harrison L., Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 2003, 19:1273-1302.
9. Friston K., Daunizeau J., Stephan K.E. Model selection and gobbledygook: Response to Lohmann et al. Neuroimage. 2013, 75:275-278.
10. Gutin G., Yeo A., Zverovich A. Traveling salesman should not be greedy: domination analysis of greedy-type heuristics for the TSP. Discrete Appl. Math. 2002, 117:81-86.
11. Hoeting J.A., Madigan D., Raftery A.E., Volinsky C.T. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat. Sci. 1999, 14(4):382-417.
12. Lohmann G., Erfurth K., Müller K., Turner R. Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 2012, 59(3):2322-2329.
13. Moreno E., Giron F., Casella G. Consistency of objective Bayes factors as the model dimension grows. Ann. Stat. 2010, 38(4):1937-1952.
14. Penny W., Stephan K., Daunizeau J., Rosa M., Friston K., Schofield T., Leff A. Comparing families of dynamic causal models. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6(3):e1000709.
15. Williams D. Weighing the Odds: A Course in Probability and Statistics 2001, Cambridge University Press.