Documenting the location of systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: Correlation with multi-parametric MRI

Cancer Imaging

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 31-36

  Turkbey, Baris ^a   Xu, Sheng ^b   Kruecker, Jochen ^b   Locklin, Julia ^a   Pang, Yuxi ^c   Shah, Vijay ^a,d   Bernardo, Marcelino ^a,d   Baccala, Angelo ^a   Rastinehad, Ardeshir ^a   Benjamin, Compton ^a   Merino, Maria J ^a   Wood, Bradford J ^a   Choyke, Peter L ^a   Pinto, Peter A ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^d SAIC FREDERICK INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Multi parametric MR imaging; Prostate cancer; TRUS MRI fusion tracking

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NEEDLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

AGED; BIOPSY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 79959593647     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14707330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0007     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2010. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2010.
2. Turkbey B, Xu S, Kruecker J, et al. Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion. BJU Int 2011; 107: 53-7. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X. 2010.09483.x. PMid:20590543.
3. Wood BJ, Zhang H, Durrani A, et al. Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16: 493-505. PMid:15802449. (Pubitemid 40464192)
4. Singh AK, Kruecker J, Xu S, et al. Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2008; 101: 841-5. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07348.x. PMid:18070196.
5. Xu S, Kruecker J, Turkbey B, et al. Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies. Comput Aided Surg 2008; 13: 255-64. doi:10.3109/10929080802364645. PMid:18821344.
6. Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Mani H, et al. Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3T for detection-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2010; 255: 89-99. doi:10.1148/radiol.09090475. PMid:20308447.
7. Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Mehta SS, Carroll PR; CaPSURE. Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE). J Urol 2003; 170: S21-5. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000095025. 03331.c6. PMid:14610406.
8. Onik G, Barzell W. Transperineal 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate: an essential tool in selecting patients for focal prostate cancer therapy. Urol Oncol 2008; 26: 506-10. PMid:18774464.
9. Merrick GS, Taubenslag W, Andreini H, et al. The morbidity of transperineal template-guided prostate mapping biopsy. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1524-9. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07542.x. PMid:18325064.