A Multi-criteria Multi-stakeholder Industrial Projects Prioritization in Gaza Strip

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1217-1227

  Agha, Salah R ^a   Jarbo, Mohammed H ^a   Matr, Said J ^a  

^a ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF GAZA   (Palestine)

Author keywords

AHP; Industrial projects; MCDM; Prioritization; Selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876440508     PISSN: 2193567X     EISSN: 21914281     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-012-0346-7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics.
2. Ho W.: Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 186(5), 211-228 (2008).
3. Vaidya O., Kumar S.: Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169(1), 1-29 (2006).
4. Parsaei H., Wilhelm M.: A justification methodology for automated manufacturing technologies. Comput. Ind. Eng. 16(3), 363-373 (1989).
5. Yang C., Chen B.: Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 17(7), 926-941 (2006).
6. Alidi A. S.: Use of the analytic hierarchy process to measure the initial viability of industrial projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 14(4), 205-208 (1996).
7. Virginia D. J., Tabucannon M. T.: Multi-objective models for selection of priority areas and industrial projects for investment promotion. Eng. Costs Prod. Econ. 10, 173-184 (1986).
8. Tabucanon, M. T.: A model for identifying areas for industrial investment priorities for the board of investments. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Systems Modeling in Developing Countries, May 8-11, AIT-Bangkok (1978).
9. Lai V., Wong B. K., Cheung W.: Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: a case using the AHP in the software selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1(1), 134-144 (2002).
10. Shang J. et al.: A unified framework for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(85), 297-315 (1995).
11. Archer N. P., Ghasemzadeh F.: An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. Int. J. Project Manage. 17(4), 207-216 (2002).
12. Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Elhag, Taha M.: An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 54(3), 513-525 (2007).
13. Weiwu W., Jun K.: Highway transportation comprehensive evaluation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 27(2), 257-259 (1994).
14. Chin K. S., Chiu S., Tummala V. M. R.: An evaluation of success factors using AHP to implement ISO 14001 based EMS. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 16(4), 341-361 (1998).
15. Agha S. R.: Evaluating and benchmarking non-governmental training programs: an analytic hierarchy approach. Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 2(2), 77-84 (2008).
16. Andijani A.: A multi-criterion approach to kanban allocations. Omega 4(26), 483-493 (1998).
17. Kwak N. K., Changwon L.: A multi-criteria decision making approach to university resource allocations and information infrastructure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(110), 234-242 (1998).
18. Ramanathan R., Ganesh L.: Using AHP for resource allocation problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 80(4), 410-417 (1995).
19. Ulengin F., Ulengin B.: Forecasting foreign exchange rates: a comparative evaluation of AHP. Omega 22(5), 505-519 (1994).
20. Korpela J., Tuominen M.: Inventory forecasting with a multiple criteria decision tool. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 45(3), 159-168 (1997).
21. Saaty T. L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980).
22. Expert Choice Inc.; Expert Choice, Expert Choice Software and Manual. 4922 Ellsworth Ave., Pittsburgh (2004).
23. Saaty T. L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83-98 (2008).