A six step approach for developing computer based assessment in medical education

Medical Teacher

Volumn 35, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2013, Pages

  Hassanien, Mohammed Ahmed ^a   Al Hayani, Abdulmoneam ^a   Abu Kamer, Rasha ^a   Almazrooa, Adnan ^b  

^a King Abdulaziz University   (Saudi Arabia)

^b TAIBAH UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876430596     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.765542     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Alderson JC. 2000. Technology in testing: The present and the future. System 28(4): 593-603.
2. Brown G, Bull J, Pendlebury M. 1997. Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
3. Brown S, Race P, Bull J (eds.). 1999. Computer assisted assessment in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
4. Conole G. 2004. Report on the effectiveness of tools for e-learning. Report for the JISC. Commissioned research study on the effectiveness of resources, tools and support services used by practitioners in designing and delivering e-learning activities. Retrieved from the JISC database. Available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/11/89.
5. Conole G, Dyke M. 2004. What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? ALT-J 12(2): 111-123.
6. Dennick R, Wilkinson S, Purcell N. 2009. Online eAssessment: AMEE guide no. 39. Med Teach 31(3): 192-206.
7. Elders W, Bloemendaal P, Bos N, Quaak M, Sijstermans R, Jong P. 2008. Twelve tips for computer-based assessment in medical education. Med Teach 30: 673-678.
8. Hochlehnert A, Brass K, Moeltner A, Juenger J. 2011. Does medical students' preference of test format (computer-based vs. paper-based) have an influence on performance? BMC Med Educ 11: 89.
9. Kreiter C, Haugen T, Leaven T, Goerdt C, Rosenthal N, McGaghie W, Dee F. 2011. A report on the piloting of a novel computer-based medical case simulation for teaching and formative assessment of diagnostic laboratory testing. Med Educ Online 16: 1-7.
10. Laurillard D. 2002. Rethinking university teaching a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. 2nd ed. London: Routledge Falmer.
11. McGuire C. 1999. George E. Miller, MD, 1918-1998. Med Educ 33: 312-314.
12. Mooney GA, Bligh JG, Leinster SJ. 1998. Some techniques for computerbased assessment in medical education. Med Teach 20(6): 560-566.
13. Olsen J, Maynes D, Slawson D, Ho K. 1989. Comparison of paperadministered, computer-administered and computerized achievement tests. J Educ Comput Res 5: 311-326.
14. Rudland JR, Schwartz P, Ali A. 2011. Moving a formative test from a paperbased to a computer-based format. A student viewpoint. Med Teach 33(9): 738-743.