Patient-specific guide for revision of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: Beneficial first results of a new operating technique performed on 10 patients

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 165-169

  Kerens, Bart ^a   Boonen, Bert ^b   Schotanus, Martijn ^b   Kort, Nanne ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Sittard Geleen Heerlen   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT PLANNING; UNICONDYLAR KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMUR; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; TIBIA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84876373770     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2013.785908     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Chatain F, Richard A, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Neyret P. Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Rep Appar Mot 2004; 90 (1): 49-57.
2. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Chemello C, Cerveri P. Computer-assisted revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2010; 33 (10): 52-7.
3. Dudley T E, Gioe T J, Sinner P, Mehle S. Registry outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revisions. Clin Orthop 2008; (466) (7): 1666-70.
4. Johnson S, Jones P, Newman J H. The Survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental knee replacements. The Knee 2007; 14 (2): 154-7.
5. Kerens B, Kort N P. Overstuffed medial compartment after mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscop 2012; 19 (6): 952-4.
6. Lombardi A V, Jr., Berend K R, Adams J B. Patient-specifc approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (9): 927-30.
7. McAuley J P, Engh G A, Ammeen D J. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; (392): 279-82.
8. Oduwole K O, Sayana M K, Onayemi F, McCarthy T, O'Byrne J. Analysis of revision procedures for failed unicondylar knee replacement. Irish J Med Science 2009; 179 (3): 361-4.
9. Pearse A J, Hooper G J, Rothwell A, Frampton C. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: The New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010; 92 (4): 508-12.
10. Saldanha K A, Keys G W, Svard U C, White S H, Rao C. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty-Results of a multicentre study. The Knee 2007; 14 (4): 275-9.
11. Saragaglia D, Estour G, Nemer C, Colle P E. Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: Strategy and results. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (4): 969-74.
12. Springer B D, Scott R D, Thornhill T S. Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop 2006; (446): 214-20.
13. Vardi G, Strover A E. Early complications of unicompartmental knee replacement: The Droitwich Experience. The Knee 2004; 11 (5): 389-94.