Comparison of sterile versus nonsterile acellular dermal matrices for breast reconstruction

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 497-499

  Buseman, Jason ^a   Wong, Lesley ^a   Kemper, Pamela ^a   Hill, Joseph L ^a   Nimtz, Jared ^a   Rinker, Brian ^a   Vasconez, Henry C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

acellular dermal matrix; breast reconstruction; seroma; sterile

Indexed keywords

ALLODERM; COLLAGEN;

ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASEPSIS; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEROMA; TISSUE EXPANDER;

ACELLULAR DERMIS; ADULT; ASEPSIS; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COLLAGEN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEROMA; STERILIZATION; TISSUE EXPANSION DEVICES;

EID: 84876365403     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: 15363708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827f52c8     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1606-1614.
2. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429-436.
3. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, et al. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1755-1762.
4. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:674-678.
5. Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, et al. The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129:901e-908e.
6. Kim JYS, Davila AA, Persing S, et al. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:28-41.
7. Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:346-356.
8. Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systemic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1162-1169.
9. Hill JL, Wong L, Kemper P, et al. Infectious complications associated with the use of acellular dermal matrix in implant-based bilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:432-434.
10. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Lockwood M. Immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders and AlloDerm. In: Spear SI, Wiley SC, Robb GL, et al, eds. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:484-488.
11. Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:232-239.
12. Kronowitz SJ. Current status of implant-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130: 513e-524e.
13. Losken A. Early results using sterilized acellular human dermis (NeoForm) in postmastectomy tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1654-1658.
14. Brooke S, Mesa J, Uluer M, et al. Complications in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a comparison of AlloDerm, DermaMatrix, and FlexHD acel-luar inferior pole dermal slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:347-349.