Enhanced anaerobic digestion of organic contaminants containing diverse microbial population by combined microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) and anaerobic reactor under Fe(III) reducing conditions

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 136, Issue , 2013, Pages 273-280

  Zhang, Jingxin ^a   Zhang, Yaobin ^a   Quan, Xie ^a   Chen, Shuo ^a   Afzal, Shahzad ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Anaerobic reactor; Aze dye wastewater; Microbial community; Microbial electrolysis cell (MEC); Pyrosequencing

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MICROORGANISMS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REDOX REACTIONS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC REACTOR; DYE WASTEWATERS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; MICROBIAL ELECTROLYSIS CELLS; PYROSEQUENCING;

ELECTROLYTIC CELLS;

AZO REDUCTASE; BACTERIAL RNA; DNA 16S; DYE; IRON; SUCROSE;

BIODEGRADATION; BIOFILM; BIOREACTOR; CELL ORGANELLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DYE; ELECTROKINESIS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; IRON; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; ORGANIC POLLUTANT; OXIC CONDITIONS; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REDOX POTENTIAL; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ACTINOBACTERIA; ADDITION REACTION; ALPHAPROTEOBACTERIA; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; BACTEROIDETES; BETAPROTEOBACTERIA; BIODIVERSITY; BIOFILM; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; CHLOROFLEXI; CLOSTRIDIUM; COLOR; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOLORIZATION; DEGRADATION; DELTAPROTEOBACTERIA; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EPSILONPROTEOBACTERIA; FIRMICUTES; MICROBIAL ELECTROLYSIS CELL; MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOBACTERIA; PYROSEQUENCING; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REDUCTION; SEDIMENT; SLUDGE; SPHINGOBACTERIA; SPIROCHETE; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL;

EID: 84876336301     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.103     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. APHA Standard METHODS for the Examinationon of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, Washington D.C., USA. 18th ed.
2. Bond D.R., Lovley D.R. Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes. Applied & Environmental Microbiology 2003, 69(3):1548-1555.
3. Chang J.S., Chou C., Lin Y.C., Lin P.J., Ho J.Y., Hu T.L. Kinetic characteristics of bacterial azo dye decolorization by Pseudomonas luteola. Water Research 2001, 35(12):2041-2850.
4. Clauwaert P., Verstraete W. Methanogenesis in membraneless microbial electrolysis cells. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology 2009, 82(5):829-836.
5. Coates J.D., Cole K.A., Michaelidou U., Patrick J., Mcinerney M.J., Achenbach L.A. Biological control of hog waste odor through stimulated microbial Fe(III) reduction. Applied & Environmental Microbiology 2005, 71(8). 4728-4635.
6. Grabowski A., Tindall B.J., Bardin V., Blanchet D., Jeanthon C. Petrimonas sulfuriphila gen. nov., sp nov., a mesophilic fermentative bacterium isolated from a biodegraded oil reservoir. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2005, 55(Pt 3):1113-1121.
7. Gralnick J.A., Newman D.K. MicroReview: extracellular respiration. Molecular Microbiology 2007, 65(1):1-11.
8. Harms G., Layton A.C., Dionisi H.M., Garrett V.M., Hawkins S.A., Robinson K.G., et al. Real-time PCR quantification of nitrifying bacteria in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environmental Science & Technology 2003, 37(2):343-351.
9. Ieropoulos I.A., Greenman J., Melhuish C., Hart J. Comparative study of three types of microbial fuel cell. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2005, 37(2):238-245.
10. Kim G.T., Webster G., Wimpenny J.W.T., Kim B.H., Kim H.J., Weightman A.J. Bacterial community structure, compartmentalization and activity in a microbial fuel cell. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2006, 101(3):698-710.
11. Lalaurette E., Thammannagowda S., Mohagheghi A., Maness P.C., Logan B.E. Hydrogen production from cellulose in a two-stage process combining fermentation and electrohydrogenesis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34(15):6201-6210.
12. Liu W.Z., Wang A.J., Cheng S.A., Logan B.E., Yu H., Deng Y., et al. Geochip-based functional gene analysis of anodophilic communities in microbial electrolysis cells under different operational modes. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44(19):7729-7735.
13. Logan B.E. Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells. Nature Review Microbiology 2009, 7(5):375-381.
14. Logan B.E., Regan J.M. Microbial fuel cells-challenges and applications. Environmental Science & Technology 2006, 40(17):5172-5180.
15. 2 production from waste activated sludge. Water Research 2012, 46(7):2425-2434.
16. Margulies M., Egholm M., Altman W.E., Attiya S., Bader J.S., Bemben L.A., et al. Genome sequencing in micro fabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 2005, 437(7057):376-380.
17. Mu Y., Rabaey K., Rozendal R.A., Yuan Z.G., Keller J. Decolorization of azo dyes in bioelectrochemical systems. Environment Science and Technology 2009, 43(13):5137-5143.
18. Nielsen P.H., Mielczarek A.T., Kragelund C., Nielsen J.L., Saunders A.M., Kong Y., et al. A conceptual ecosystem model of microbial communities in enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants. Water Research 2010, 44(17):5070-5088.
19. Ringeisen B.R., Henderson E., Wu P.K., Pietron J., Ray R., Little B., Biffinger J.C., Jones-Meehan J.M. High powder density from a miniature microbial fuel cell using Shewanella oneidensis DSP10. Environmental Science and Technology 2006, 40(8):2629-2634.
20. Rozendal R.A., Hamelers H.V.M., Euverink G.J.W., Metz S.J., Buisman C.J.N. Principle and perspectives of hydrogen production through biocatalyzed electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31(12):1632-1640.
21. Stabnikov V.P., Tay S.T.L., Tay D.K., Ivanov V.N. Effect of iron hydroxide on phosphate removal during anaerobic digestion of activated sludge. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology 2004, 40(4):376-380.
22. Tarakovsky B., Mehta P., Bourque J.S., Guiot S.R. Electrolysis-enhanced anaerobic digestion of wastewater. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102(10):5685-5691.
23. Thrash J.C., Coates J.D. Review: direct and indirect electrical stimulation of microbial metabolism. Environmental Science and Technology 2008, 42(11):3921-3931.
24. Wrana N., Sparling R., Cicek N., Levin D.B. Hydrogen gas production in a microbial electrolysis cell by electrohydrogenesis. Journal of Cleaner Production 2010, 18(1):S105-S111.
25. Wrighton K.C., Agbo P., Warnecke F., Weber K.A., Brodie E.L., Desantis T.Z., et al. A novel ecological role of the Firmicutes identified in thermophilic microbial fuel cells. ISME Journal 2008, 2(11):1146-1156.
26. Wrighton K.C., Virdis B., Clauwaert P., Read S.T., Daly R.A., Boon N., et al. Bacterial community structure corresponds to performance during cathodic nitrate reduction. ISME Journal 2010, 4(11):1443-1455.
27. Yamada T., Sekiguchi Y., Hanada S., Imachi H., Ohashi A., Harada H., et al. Anaerolines thermolimosa sp. nov., Levilinea saccharolytica gen. nov., sp. nov. and Leptolinea tardivitalis gen. nov. sp. nov., novel filamentous anaerobes, and description of the new classes Anaerolineae classis nov. and Caldilineae classis nov. in the bacterial phylum Chloroflexi. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2006, 56:1331-1340.
28. Yoo E.S., Libra J., Adrian L. Mechanism of decolorization of azo dyes in anaerobic mixed culture. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2001, 127(9):844-849.
29. Zhang J.X., Zhang Y.B., Quan X., Li Y., Chen S., Zhao H.M., et al. An anaerobic reactor packed with a pair of Fe-graphite plate electrodes for bioaugmentation of azo dye wastewater treatment. Biochemical Engineering Journal 2012, 63(1):31-37.
30. Zhang G.D., Wang K., Zhao Q.L., Jiao Y., Lee D.J. Effect of cathode types on long-term performance and anode bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology 2012, 118:249-256.