Erratum to Microtubule dynamic instability: A new model with coupled GTP hydrolysis and multistep catastrophe [BioEssays 35, 5 (2013) 452-461] DOI: 10.1002/bies.201200131;Microtubule dynamic instability: A new model with coupled GTP hydrolysis and multistep catastrophe

BioEssays

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 452-461

  Bowne Anderson, Hugo ^a   Zanic, Marija ^a   Kauer, Monika ^a   Howard, Jonathon ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Catastrophe; Cytoskeleton; GTP hydrolysis; Microtubule

Indexed keywords

ALPHA TUBULIN; BETA TUBULIN; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; TUBULIN;

ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL STRUCTURE; CYTOSKELETON; MICROTUBULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; POLYMERIZATION; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN STABILITY;

EID: 84876314086     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201370054     Document Type: Erratum

References (54)

1. Mitchison T, Kirschner M. 1984. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 312: 237- 42.
2. Walker R, O'Brien E, Pryer N, Soboero M, et al. 1988. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light-microscopy - rate constants and transition frequencies. J Cell Biol 107: 1437- 48.
3. Gardner MK, Zanic M, Gell C, Bormuth V, et al. 2011. Depolymerizing kinesins Kip3 and MCAK shape cellular microtubule architecture by differential control of catastrophe. Cell 147: 1092- 103.
4. Odde DJ, Cassimeris L, Buettner HM. 1995. Kinetics of microtubule catastrophe assessed by probabilistic analysis. Biophys J 69: 796- 802.
5. Verde F, Dogterom M, Stelzer E, Karsenti E, et al. 1992. Control of microtubule dynamics and length by cyclin A-and cyclin B-dependent kinases in Xenopus egg extracts. J Cell Biol 118: 1097- 108.
6. Dogterom M, Leibler S. 1993. Physical aspects of the growth and regulation of microtubule structures. Phys Rev Lett 70: 1347- 50.
7. Hyman AA, Salser S, Drechsel DN, Unwin N, et al. 1992. Role of GTP hydrolysis in microtubule dynamics: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue, GMPCPP. Mol Biol Cell 3: 1155- 67.
8. Walker RA, Inoué S, Salmon ED. 1989. Asymmetric behavior of severed microtubule ends after ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of individual microtubules in vitro. J Cell Biol 108: 931- 7.
9. Walker RA, Pryer NK, Salmon ED. 1991. Dilution of individual microtubules observed in real time in vitro: evidence that cap size is small and independent of elongation rate. J Cell Biol 114: 73- 81.
10. Voter WA, O'Brien ET, Erickson HP. 1990. Dilution-induced disassembly of microtubules: relation to dynamic instability and the GTP cap. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 18: 55- 62.
11. Mickey B, Howard J. 1995. Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents. J Cell Biol 130: 909- 17.
12. Drechsel DN, Kirschner MW. 1994. The minimum GTP cap required to stabilize microtubules. Curr Biol 4: 1053- 61.
13. Caplow M, Shanks J. 1996. Evidence that a single monolayer tubulin-GTP cap is both necessary and sufficient to stabilize microtubules. Mol Biol Cell 7: 663- 75.
14. O'Brien ET, Voter WA, Erickson HP. 1987. GTP hydrolysis during microtubule assembly. Biochemistry 26: 4148- 56.
15. Melki R, Fievez S, Carlier MF. 1996. Continuous monitoring of Pi release following nucleotide hydrolysis in actin or tubulin assembly using 2-amino-6-mercapto-7-methylpurine ribonucleoside and purine-nucleoside phosphorylase as an enzyme-linked assay. Biochemistry 35: 12038- 45.
16. Vandecandelaere A, Brune M, Webb MR, Martin SR, et al. 1999. Phosphate release during microtubule assembly: what stabilizes growing microtubules? Biochemistry 38: 8179- 88.
17. Nogales EE, Wolf SGS, Downing KHK. 1998. Structure of the alpha beta tubulin dimer by electron crystallography. Nature 391: 199- 203.
18. Kerssemakers JW, Munteanu EL, Laan L, Noetzel TL, et al. 2006. Assembly dynamics of microtubules at molecular resolution. Nature 442: 709- 12.
19. Schek HT, Gardner MK, Cheng J, Odde DJ, et al. 2007. Microtubule assembly dynamics at the nanoscale. Curr Biol 17: 1445- 55.
20. Howard J, Hyman AA. 2007. Microtubule polymerases and depolymerases. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19: 31- 5.
21. Dimitrov A, Quesnoit M, Moutel S, Cantaloube I, et al. 2008. Detection of GTP-tubulin conformation in vivo reveals a role for GTP remnants in microtubule rescues. Science 322: 1353- 6.
22. Gardner MK, Charlebois BD, Jánosi IM, Howard J, et al. 2011. Rapid microtubule self-assembly kinetics. Cell 146: 582- 92.
23. Chrétien D, Fuller SD, Karsenti E. 1995. Structure of growing microtubule ends: two-dimensional sheets close into tubes at variable rates. J Cell Biol 129: 1311- 28.
24. Wade RHR, Hyman AAA. 1997. Microtubule structure and dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol 9: 12- 7.
25. Erickson HP, Voter WA. 1986. Nucleation of microtubule assembly. Experimental kinetics, computer fitting of models, and observations on tubulin rings. Ann N Y Acad Sci 466: 552- 65.
26. Howard J. 2001. Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
27. Hinow P, Rezania V, Tuszyński J. 2009. Continuous model for microtubule dynamics with catastrophe, rescue, and nucleation processes. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 80: 031904.
28. Mazilu I, Zamora G, Gonzalez J. 2010. A stochastic model for microtubule length dynamics. Physica A 389: 419- 27.
29. Ranjith P, Lacoste D, Mallick K, Joanny J-F. 2009. Nonequilibrium self-assembly of a filament coupled to ATP/GTP hydrolysis. Biophys J 96: 2146- 59.
30. Ranjith P, Mallick K, Joanny J-F, Lacoste D. 2010. Role of ATP-hydrolysis in the dynamics of a single actin filament. Biophys J 98: 1418- 27.
31. Mirny LA, Needleman DJ. 2010. Quantitative Characterization of Filament Dynamics by Single-Molecule Lifetime Measurements in Microtubules, in vitro. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
32. Ranjith P, Kolomeisky AB, Lacoste D. 2012. Random hydrolysis controls the dynamic instability of microtubules. Biophys J 102: 1274- 83.
33. Brun L, Rupp B, Ward JJ, Nédélec F. 2009. A theory of microtubule catastrophes and their regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 21173- 8.
34. Flyvbjerg H, Holy T, Leibler S. 1994. Stochastic dynamics of microtubules - a model for caps and catastrophes. Phys Rev Lett 73: 2372- 5.
35. Flyvbjerg H, Holy T, Leibler S. 1996. Microtubule dynamics: caps, catastrophes, and coupled hydrolysis. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 54: 5538- 60.
36. Drechsel DN, Hyman AA, Cobb MH, Kirschner MW. 1992. Modulation of the dynamic instability of tubulin assembly by the microtubule-associated protein Tau. Mol Biol Cell 3: 1141- 54.
37. Margolin G, Gregoretti IV, Goodson HV, Alber MS. 2006. Analysis of a mesoscopic stochastic model of microtubule dynamic instability. Nat Methods 74: 041920.
38. Chen YD, Hill TL. 1985. Monte Carlo study of the GTP cap in a five-start helix model of a microtubule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 1131- 5.
39. Bayley PM, Schilstra MJ, Martin SR. 1990. Microtubule dynamic instability: numerical simulation of microtubule transition properties using a lateral cap model. J Cell Sci 95: 33- 48.
40. Martin SR, Schilstra MJ, Bayley PM. 1993. Dynamic instability of microtubules: Monte Carlo simulation and application to different types of microtubule lattice. Biophys J 65: 578- 96.
41. VanBuren V, Odde DJ, Cassimeris L. 2002. Estimates of lateral and longitudinal bond energies within the microtubule lattice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 6035- 40.
42. VanBuren V, Cassimeris L, Odde DJ. 2005. Mechanochemical model of microtubule structure and self-assembly kinetics. Biophys J 89: 2911- 26.
43. Margolin G, Goodson HV, Alber MS. 2011. Mean-field study of the role of lateral cracks in microtubule dynamics. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 83: 041905.
44. Margolin G, Gregoretti IV, Cickovski TM, Li C, et al. 2012. The mechanisms of microtubule catastrophe and rescue: implications from analysis of a dimer-scale computational model. Mol Biol Cell 23: 642- 56.
45. Chretien D, Metoz F, Verde F, Karsenti E, et al. 1992. Lattice defects in microtubules: protofilament numbers vary within individual microtubules. J Cell Biol 117: 1031- 40.
46. Janson ME, de Dood ME, Dogterom M. 2003. Dynamic instability of microtubules is regulated by force. J Cell Biol 161: 1029- 34.
47. Bieling P, Laan L, Schek H, Munteanu EL, et al. 2007. Reconstitution of a microtubule plus-end tracking system in vitro. Nature 450: 1100- 5.
48. Zanic M, Stear JH, Hyman AA, Howard J. 2009. EB1 recognizes the nucleotide state of tubulin in the microtubule lattice. PLoS ONE 4: e7585.
49. Maurer SP, Fourniol FJ, Bohner G, Moores CA, et al. 2012. EBs recognize a nucleotide-dependent structural cap at growing microtubule ends. Cell 149: 371- 82.
50. Seetapun D, Castle BT, McIntyre AJ, Tran PT, et al. 2012. Estimating the microtubule GTP cap size in vivo. Curr Biol 22: 1681- 7.
51. Stukalin EB, Kolomeisky AB. 2006. ATP hydrolysis stimulates large length fluctuations in single actin filaments. Biophys J 90: 2673- 85.
52. Tran PT, Walker RA, Salmon ED. 1997. A metastable intermediate state of microtubule dynamic instability that differs significantly between plus and minus ends. J Cell Biol 138: 105- 17.
53. Chen Y, Hill TL. 1983. Use of Monte Carlo calculations in the study of microtubule subunit kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 7520- 3.
54. Hill TL. 1984. Introductory analysis of the GTP-cap phase-change kinetics at the end of a microtubule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 6728- 32.