Complications associated with Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 and glaucoma drainage devices

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 573-577

  Robert, Marie Claude ^a   Pomerleau, Valérie ^b   Harissi Dagher, Mona ^a  

^a NOTRE DAME HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CASE STUDY; CHOROID HEMORRHAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; ENDOPHTHALMITIS; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT; HUMAN; KERATOPROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VITREORETINOPATHY; VITREOUS DISEASE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; CORNEA; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANTS; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876284869     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302770     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aldave AJ, Kamal KM, Vo RC, et al. The Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmology 2009;116:640-51
2. Dohlman C, Harissi-Dagher M, Khan B, et al. Introduction to the use of the Boston keratoprosthesis. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2006;1:41-8
3. Robert MC, Harissi-Dagher M. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the CHUM experience. Can J Ophthtal 2011;46:164-8
4. Chew HF, Ayres BD, Hammersmith KM, et al. Boston keratoprosthesis outcomes and complications. Cornea 2009;28:989-96
5. Greiner MA, Li JY, Mannis MJ. Longer-term vision outcomes and complications with the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis at the University of California, Davis. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1543-50
6. Talagic J, Agoumi Y, Gagné S, et al. Prevalence, progression, and impact of glaucoma on vision after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:267-74
7. Banitt M. Evaluation and management of glaucoma after keratoprosthesis surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011;22:133-6
8. Li J, Greiner M, Brandt J, et a l. Long-term complications associated with glaucoma drainage devices and Boston keratoprosthesis. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:209-18
9. Dohlman C, Harissi-Dagher M. The Boston keratoprosthesis: a new threadless design. Digit J Ophthalmol 2007;13. http://www.djo.harvard.edu/site. php?url=/physicians/oa/1055 (accessed 12 Aug 2012)
10. Robert M, Biernacki K, Harissi-Dagher M. Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 surgery: use of frozen versus fresh corneal donor carriers. Cornea 2012.31. 339-45
11. Qian C, Harissi-Dagher M. Delayed suprachoroidal haemorrhage following Boston keratoprosthesis in two aniridic patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;95:434-6
12. Dunlap K, Chak G, Aquavella JV, et al. Short-term visual outcomes of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation. Ophthalmology 2010;117:687-92
13. Netland P, Terada H, Dohlman C. Glaucoma associated with keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology 1998;105:751-7
14. Gedde S, Schiffman J, Feuer W, et al. Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:789-803
15. Gedde S, Heuer D, Parrish RI, group Ts. Results from the tube versus trabeculectomy study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010;21:123-8
16. Kamyar R, Weizer J, Heitor de Paula F, et al. Glaucoma associated with Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Cornea 2012;31:134-9
17. Law S, Nguyen A, Coleman A, et al. Severe loss of central vision in patients with advanc ed glaucoma undergoing trabeculectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1044-50
18. Gedde S, Herndon L, Brandt J, et al. Surgical complications in the tube versus trabeculectomy study during the first y ear of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:23-31
19. Christakis P, Kalenak J, Zurakowski D, et al. The Ahmed versus Baerveldt study: one-year treatment outcomes. Ophthalmology 2011;118:2180-9
20. Vajaranant T, Blair M, McMahon T, et al. Special considerations for pars plana tube-shunt placement in Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol 2010;128:1480-2
21. Rockwood E, Kalenak J, Plotnik J, et al. Prospective ultrasonographic evaluation of intraoperative and delayed postoperative suprachoroidal hemorrhage from glaucoma filtering surgery. J Glaucoma 1995;4:16-24
22. Smith M, Doyle J, Ticrney JJ. A comparison of glaucoma drainage implant tube coverage. J Glaucoma 2002;11:143-7