Review of results from the tube versus trabeculectomy study

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 123-128

  Gedde, Steven ^a,r   Anderson, Douglas ^a   Budenz, Donald ^a   Del Calvo, Madeline ^a   DePool, Ivette ^a   Fantes, Francisco ^a   Greenfield, David ^a   Hochberg, Jessica ^a   Hodapp, Elizabeth ^a   Lee, Richard ^a   Marcellino, Alexia ^a   Palmberg, Paul ^a   Parrish II, Richard ^a,r   Herndon, Leon ^b,r   Challa, Pratap ^b   Santiago Turla, Cecile ^b   WuDunn, Darrell ^c,r   Emerick, Geoffrey ^d,r   Heuer, Dale ^e,r   Kent, Alexander ^f,r   Bradham, Carol ^f   Langdale, Lisa ^f   Barton, Keith ^g,r   Amalfitano, Francesca ^g   Rai, Poornima ^g   Sidoti, Paul ^h,r   Gedal, Amy ^h   Luayon, James ^h   Ovase, Roma ^h   Tai, Katy ^h   Nguyen, Quang ^i,r   Shields, Steven ^j,r   Anderson, Kevin ^j   Moya, Frank ^j   Brandt, James ^k,r   Lim, Michele ^k   Sponzo, Marilyn ^k   Sherwood, Mark ^l,r   Skuta,, Gregory ^m   Jobson, Jason ^m   Ogilbee, Lisa ^m   Reynolds, Adam ^m   Sarkisian, Steven ^m   Varma, Rohit ^n,r   Feldman, Robert ^o,r   Baker, Laura ^o   Bell, Nicholas ^o   Carranza, JoLene ^o   Francis, Brian ^o   Prum, Bruce ^p,r   Perkins,, Todd ^a,q,r   Kaufman, Paul ^a   Soderling, Barbara ^a   Feuer, William ^a,r   Londono, Luz ^a   Schiffman, Joyce ^a,r   Shi, Wei ^a   Chen, Philip ^r   Singh, Kuldev ^r   Spaeth, George ^r   Wright, Martha ^r   Skuta, Gregory ^r   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d LOYOLA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^f MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^g MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

ⁱ SCRIPPS CLINIC   (United States)

^j SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^r NONE

more..

Author keywords

Glaucoma surgery; Trabeculectomy; Tube shunt

Indexed keywords

MITOMYCIN;

ADULT; AGED; CATARACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHUNTING; TRABECULECTOMY; TUBE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

EID: 76949086302     PISSN: 10408738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360b68     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Ramulu PY, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, Robin AL. Utilization of various glaucoma surgeries and procedures in Medicare beneficiaries from 1995 to 2004. Ophthalmology 2007; 114:2265-2270.
2. Chen PP, Yamamoto T, Sawada A, et al. Use of antifibrosis agents and glaucoma drainage devices in the American and Japanese Glaucoma Societies. J Glaucoma 1997; 6:192-196.
3. Joshi AB, Parrish RK, Feuer WF. 2002 Survey of the American Glaucoma Society. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery and antifibrotic use. J Glaucoma 2005; 14:172-174.
4. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: design and baseline characteristics of study patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140:275-287.
5. Gedde SJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, et al. Surgical complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study during the first year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143:23-31.
6. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after one year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143:9-22.
7. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Three-year follow-up of the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 148:670-684.
8. Rauscher FM, Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, et al. Motility disturbances in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study during the first year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147:458-466.
9. Minckler DS, Francis BA, Hodapp EA, et al. Aqueous shunts in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2008; 115:1089-1098.
10. Wilson MR, Mendis U, Paliwal A, Haynatzka V. Long-term follow-up of primary glaucoma surgery with Ahmed glaucoma valve implant versus trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136:464-470.
11. Stein JD, Ruiz D, Belsky D, et al. Longitudinal rates of postoperative adverse outcomes after glaucoma surgery among Medicare beneficiaries 1994 to 2005. Ophthalmology 2008; 115:1109-1116.
12. Jones E, Clarke J, Khaw PT. Recent advances in trabeculectomy technique. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005; 16:107-113.
13. Wells AP, Cordeiro MF, Bunce C, Khaw PT. Cystic bleb formation and related complications in limbus- versus fornix-based conjunctival flaps in pediatric and young adult trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 2192-2197.