Influence of time on dermoscopic diagnosis and management

Australasian Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 96-104

  Jaimes, Natalia ^a   Dusza, Stephen W ^a   Quigley, Elizabeth A ^a   Braun, Ralph P ^f   Puig, Susana ^g,h   Malvehy, Josep ^g,h   Kittler, Harald ⁱ   Rabinovitz, Harold S ^d   Oliviero, Margaret C ^d   Soyer, H Peter ^k   Grichnik, James M ^e   Korzenko, Adam ^c   Cabo, Horacio ^l   Carlos Ortega, Blanca ^m   Ahlgrimm Siess, Verena ^j   Kopf, Alfred W ^b   Marghoob, Ashfaq A ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SKIN AND CANCER ASSOCIATES   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^g HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

^h CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN BIOMÉDICA EN RED DE ENFERMEDADES RARAS CIBERER   (Spain)

ⁱ Universitatsklinik fur Dermatologie   (Austria)

^j University Hospital Salzburg   (Austria)

^k UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^l INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES MÉDICAS ALFREDO LANARI   (Argentina)

^m Hospital Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional la Raza   (Mexico)

more..

Author keywords

clinical reasoning; confidence; decision making process; dermoscopy; experience

Indexed keywords

ACANTHOMA; ARTICLE; BASAL CELL CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DERMATOFIBROMA; DERMATOLOGIST; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DYSPLASTIC NEVUS; EPILUMINESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; JOB EXPERIENCE; MELANOMA; RESIDENT; SEBORRHEIC KERATOSIS; SKIN BIOPSY; SKIN DEFECT; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA;

BIOPSY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DERMOSCOPY; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; SKIN DISEASES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84876284109     PISSN: 00048380     EISSN: 14400960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ajd.12001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Zalaudek I, Kittler H, Marghoob AA, et al. Time required for a complete skin examination with and without dermoscopy. Arch. Dermatol. 2008; 144: 509-513.
2. Salerni G, Carrera C, Lovatto L, et al. Benefits of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy ('two-step method of digital follow-up') in the early diagnosis of melanoma in patients at high risk for melanoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2012; 67: e17-27.
3. Epstein DS, Lange JR, Gruber SB, et al. Is physician detection associated with thinner melanomas? JAMA 1999; 281: 640-643.
4. Noor O, Nanda A, Rao BK,. A dermoscopy survey to assess who is using it and why it is or is not being used. Int. J. Dermatol. 2009; 48: 951-952.
5. Engasser HC, Warshaw EM,. Dermatoscopy use by US dermatologists: a cross-sectional survey. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2010; 63: 412-419.
6. Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C,. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 1996; 381: 520-522.
7. Norman G, Young M, Brooks L,. Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: the role of experience. Med. Educ. 2007; 41: 1140-1145.
8. Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Soyer HP, et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open Internet study. Br. J. Dermatol. 2006; 154: 431-437.
9. Simmons B,. Clinical reasoning: concept analysis. J. Adv. Nurs. 2010; 66: 1151-1158.
10. Kushniruk AW,. Analysis of complex decision-making processes in health care: cognitive approaches to health informatics. J. Biomed. Inform. 2001; 34: 365-376.
11. Dror IE, Busemeyer JR, Basola B,. Decision making under time pressure: an independent test of sequential sampling models. Mem. Cognit. 1999; 27: 713-725.
12. Arocha JF, Wang D, Patel VL,. Identifying reasoning strategies in medical decision making: a methodological guide. J. Biomed. Inform. 2005; 38: 154-171.
13. Gladwell M,. Outliers. The Story of Success. New York: Little, Brown and Co., 2008; 310.
14. Chi MTH,. Two approaches to the study of experts' characteristics. In:, Ericsson A, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, et al. (eds). The Cambridge Handbook Expertise and Expert Performance, Vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006; 901.
15. Benvenuto-Andrade C, Dusza S, Hay JL, et al. Level of confidence in diagnosis: clinical examination versus dermoscopy examination. Dermatol. Surg. 2006; 32: 738-744.
16. Norman G,. Building on experience-the development of clinical reasoning. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 355: 2251-2252.
17. Christensen EE, Murry R, Holland K, et al. The effect of search time on perception. Radiology 1981; 138: 361-365.
18. Brady TF, Konkle T, Alvarez GA, et al. Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008; 105: 14325-14329.
19. Payne VL, Crowley RS,. Assessing the use of cognitive heuristic representativeness in clinical reasoning. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2008; 2008: 571-575.
20. Eva KW,. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med. Educ. 2005; 39: 98-106.
21. Croskerry P,. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2002; 9: 1184-1204.
22. Bahrami S, Yim C,. Quality initiatives: blind spots at brain imaging. Radiographics 2009; 29: 1877-1896.
23. Altamura D, Menzies SW, Argenziano G, et al. Dermatoscopy of basal cell carcinoma: morphologic variability of global and local features and accuracy of diagnosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2010; 62: 67-75.
24. Koga H, Saida T,. Revised 3-step dermoscopic algorithm for the management of acral melanocytic lesions. Arch. Dermatol. 2011; 147: 741-743.
25. Ferrara G, Argenyi Z, Argenziano G, et al. The influence of clinical information in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic skin neoplasms. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e5375.
26. Soyer HP, Massone C, Ferrara G, et al. Limitations of histopathologic analysis in the recognition of melanoma: a plea for a combined diagnostic approach of histopathologic and dermoscopic evaluation. Arch. Dermatol. 2005; 141: 209-211.
27. Carli P, De Giorgi V, Argenziano G, et al. Pre-operative diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions: in vivo dermoscopy performs better than dermoscopy on photographic images. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2002; 16: 339-346.
28. Puig S, Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, et al. Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection: a combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma. Dermatol. Surg. 2007; 33: 1262-1273.
29. Cox NH,. A literally blinded trial of palpation in dermatologic diagnosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2007; 56: 949-951.
30. Norman G,. Dual processing and diagnostic errors. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. Theory Pract. 2009; 14 (Suppl. 1): 37-49.