Customized innovation policies and the regions: Digital content services and intelligent machinery in Finland

European Urban and Regional Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 258-274

  Sotarauta, Markku ^a   Kosonen, Kati Jasmin ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Digital business; innovation; intelligent machinery; policy; region

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIAL POLICY; INNOVATION; MACHINERY; POLICY MAKING; REGIONAL POLICY;

FINLAND;

EID: 84876268077     PISSN: 09697764     EISSN: 14617145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0969776411428499     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Asheim BT,Coenen L.Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters.Research Policy. 2005;34 (8): 1173-1190.
2. Asheim BT,Gertler MThe Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Fagerberg JMowery DNelson R, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:291-317.
3. Asheim B,Cooke P,Martin RClusters and Regional Development: Critical Reflections and Explorations. Asheim BCooke PMartin R, ed. London: Routledge; 2006:.
4. Asheim BT,Coenen L,Moodysson J,Vang J.Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: Implications for regional innovation policy.International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management. 2007;7 (2): 140-155.
5. Asheim B,Isaksen A,Moodysson J,Sotarauta MDynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation. Bathelt HFeldman MPKoegler DF, ed. London and New York: Routledge; 2011:.
6. Bathelt H,Malmberg A,Maskell P.Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation.Progress in Human Geography. 2004;28 (1): 31-56.
7. Blomqvist I,Front-Tammivirta T,Matikainen J,Norrgård L,Rautanen K,Rissanen T,Räsänen P,Saari MDigibusiness - Digitaalisten sisältöjen klusteriohjelma 2007-2013. Helsinki: Culminatum Ltd Oy; 2007:.
8. Camagni RP.The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions.Papers in Regional Science. 1995;74 (4): 317-340.
9. Cohendet P,Simon LCommunity, Economic Creativity, and Organization. Amin ARoberts J, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:227-253.
10. Cooke P,Uranga MG,Etxebarria G.Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions.Research Policy. 1997;26 (4-5): 475-491.
11. Crevoisier O,Hugues J.Territorial knowledge dynamics: From the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus.European Planning Studies. 2009;17 (8): 1223-1241.
12. Edquist CCircle. Lund University; 2008:.
13. Edquist C,Luukkonen T,Sotarauta MEvaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System - Full Report. Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki University Print; 2009:11-54.
14. Increasing Cooperation to Benefit Regions. An Evaluation of the University Consortia in Finland. Tampere: Esa Print Oy; 2009:.
15. Florida R.Toward the learning region.Futures. 1995;27 (5): 527-536.
16. Fritsch M,Stephan A.Regionalization of innovation policy - Introduction to the special issue.Research Policy. 2005;34:1123-1127.
17. Gertler M.Being there: Proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies.Economic Geography. 1995;71 (1): 1-26.
18. Gertler MSCommunity, Economic Creativity, and Organization. Amin ARoberts J, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:203-226.
19. Gertler MS.Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change.Regional Studies. 2010;44 (1): 1-15.
20. The Embedded Firm. On the Socio-economics of Industrial Networks. Grabher G, ed. London and New York: Routledge; 1993:.
21. Hamel G,Välikangas L.The quest for resilience.Harvard Business Review. 2003;:1-13.
22. Harmaakorpi V,Hermans R,Uotila TSuomalaisen innovaatiojärjestelmän mosaiikki - Alueellisten teemavalintojen tarkastelu. Helsinki: Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos (ETLA); 2009:.
23. Helsinki Metropolitan Area Economic Development Working Group (2009) Prosperous Metropolis: Competitiveness Strategy for the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Espoo: Culminatum Innovation Ltd, Redfina Oy. URL (accessed 27 October 2011): http://www.hel2.fi/Helsinginseutu/Pks/PKS_kilpailukykystrategia_engl_011009.pdf.
24. Howells JInnovation Policy in a Global Economy. Archibugi DHowells JMichie J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:67-93.
25. Intelligent Machines Cluster Programme 2007-2013 (2009) URL (accessed 27 October 2011): http://www.hermia.fi/oske/alykkaat_koneet/.
26. Isaksen A,Onsager K.Regions, networks and innovative performance: The case of knowledge-intensive industries in Norway.European Urban and Regional Studies. 2010;17 (3): 227-243.
27. Jensen M,Johnson B,Lorenz E,Lundvall B-Å.Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation.Research Policy. 2007;36:680-693.
28. Kosonen K-JCreative Regions. Technology, Culture and Knowledge Entrepreneurship. Cooke PDafna S, ed. London: Routledge; 2007:81-101.
29. Kostiainen J,Sotarauta M.Great leap or long march to knowledge economy: Institutions, actors and resources in the development of Tampere, Finland.European Planning Studies. 2003;10 (5): 415-438.
30. Kuhlmann S.Future governance of innovation policy in Europe - Three scenarios.Research Policy. 2001;30:953-976.
31. LaaksoSKilpeläinenPTähtinenV (2009) Helsinki Metropolitan Area Business Report: Structure, Location and Trends in Enterprises and Establishments of Business in the 2000s. Helsinki: YTV Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council. URL (accessed 27 October 2011): http://www.hsy.fi/seututieto/Documents/YTV_julkaisusarja/10_2009_Paakaupunkiseudun_yritysraportti.pdf.
32. Lorenz E,Lundvall B-A.How Europe's Economies Learn: Coordinating Competing Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:.
33. Lundvall B-Å,Borrás SThe Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Fagerberg JMowery DCNelson RR, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
34. Malmberg A,Maskell P.Localized learning revisited.Growth and Change. 2006;37 (1): 1-18.
35. Martin R,Sunley P.Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea?.Journal of Economic Geography. 2002;3 (1): 5-35.
36. Martinez-Vela CA,Viljamaa KInnovation, Universities, and the Competitiveness of Regions. Lester RSotarauta M, ed. Helsinki: Tekes; 2007:43-72.
37. Proposal for Finland's National Innovation Strategy. Helsinki:; 2008:.
38. Mytelka LK,Smith K.Policy learning and innovation theory: An interactive and co-evolving process.Research Policy. 2002;31:1467-1479.
39. NachiraFDiniPNicolaiA (2007) A network of digital business ecosystems for Europe: Roots, processes and perspectives. European Commission DG Information Society and Media, Introductory Paper. URL (accessed 27 October 2011): http://www.digital-ecosystems.org/book/DBE-2007.pdf.
40. Norrgård L,Rautanen K,Esch M,Huvio PMediaCity Report - Esiselvitys luovien alojen innovaatio- ja kehitystarpeista. MediaCity Vaasa: Diges ry. Vaasa, Arkmedia; 2009:.
41. Regional Development Policies in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD; 2010:.
42. Oughton C,Landabaso M,Morgan K.The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy.Journal of Technology Transfer. 2002;27:97-110.
43. Pelkonen A,Konttinen J,Oksanen J,Valovirta V,Boekholt P,Leväsluoto JOsaamisklusterit alueiden voimien yhdistäjänä - Osaamiskeskusohjelman (2007-2013) väliarviointi. Helsinki: MEE Publications; 2010:.
44. Pine J,Gilmore JHThe Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre and Every Business a Stage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1999:.
45. Porter METhe Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press; 1990:.
46. Prange H.Explaining varieties of regional innovation policies in Europe.European Urban and Regional Studies. 2008;15 (1): 39-52.
47. Roberts J.Limits to communities of practice.Journal of Management Studies. 2006;43 (3): 623-639.
48. Sotarauta M,Kautonen M.Co-evolution of the Finnish national and local innovation and science arenas: Towards a dynamic understanding of multi-level governance.Regional Studies. 2007;41 (8): 1085-1098.
49. Sotarauta M,Kosonen K-JRegional Economies as Knowledge Laboratories. Cooke PPiccaluga A, ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2004:.
50. Sotarauta M,Ramstedt-Sen T,Seppänen S,Kosonen K-J.Digital or local buzz, global or national pipelines: Patterns of knowledge sourcing in intelligent machinery and digital content services in Finland.European Planning Studies. 2011;19 (7): 1305-1330.
51. Altika database. 2009;:.
52. Storper M,Venables AJ.Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy.Journal of Economic Geography. 2004;4 (4): 351-370.
53. Suorsa K.Regionality, innovation policy and peripheral regions in Finland, Sweden and Norway.Fennia - International Journal of Geography. 2007;185 (1): 15-29.
54. Tödtling F,Trippl M.One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach.Research Policy. 2005;34:1203-1219.
55. Uyarra E.What is evolutionary about regional systems of innovation? Implications for regional policy.Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2010;20 (1): 115-137.
56. Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System - Policy Report. Veugelers RAiginger KEdquist CBreznitz DMurray GOttaviano GHyytinen AKangasharju AKetokivi MLuukkonen TMaliranta MMaula MOkko PRouvinen PSotarauta MTanayama TToivanen OYlä-Anttila P, ed. Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki University Print; 2009:.