Regionality, innovation policy and peripheral regions in Finland, Sweden and Norway

Fennia

Volumn 185, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 15-29

  Suorsa, Katri ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b Kajaani University Consortium   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGIONAL POLICY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; NORWAY; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 38649088511     PISSN: 00150010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Benneworth P & D Charles (2005). University spin-off policies and economic development in less successful regions: learning from two decades of policy practice. European Planning Studies 13: 4, 538-557.
2. Biegelbauer PS & S Borrás (2003). Introduction: ideas and the transition from technology to innovation policy. In Biegelbauer P & S Borrás (eds). Innovation policies in Europe and the US, 1-16. Ashgate, Hampshire.
3. Cooke P (2004). Introduction: regional innovation systems - an evolutionary approach. In Cooke P, M Heidenreich & HJ Braczyk (eds). Regional innovation systems. The role of governances in a globalized world, 1-18. 2nd ed. Routledge, London.
4. Copus AK (2001). From core-periphery to polycentric development: concepts ot spatial and aspatial peripherality. European Planning Studies 9: 4, 539-552.
5. Corona L, J Doutriaux & SA Mian (2006). Building knowledge regions in North America. Emerging technology innovation poles. 301 p. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
6. Espon Project 2.1.1 (2007). Spatial typologies NUTS level 3. . 14.2.2007.
7. Eures (2006). Labour market information. . 25.8.2006.
8. European trend chart on innovation. Annual innovation policy report for Finland. Covering period: September 2003-August 2004 (2005a). 42 p. European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General.
9. European trend chart on innovation. Annual innovation policy report for Sweden. Covering period: September 2003-August 2004 (2005b). 48 p. European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General.
10. European trend chart on innovation. Annual innovation policy report for Norway. Covering period: September 2003-August 2004 (2005c). European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General.
11. European trend chart on innovation. Annual innovation policy report for Finland 2004-2005 (2006a). 70 p. European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General.
12. European trend chart on innovation. Annual innovation policy report for Sweden 2004-2005 (2006b). 73 p. European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General.
13. European trend chart on innovation. Annual innovation policy report for Norway 2004-2005 (2006c). 61 p. European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General.
14. Finavia (2006). Matkustajat: 11/2006. (Passengers: 11/2006). . 20.12.2006.
15. Gergils H (2006). Dynamic innovation systems in the Nordic Countries? Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. 423 p. SNS Förlag, Stockholm.
16. Gløersen E, A Dubois, A Copus & C Schürmann (2006). Northern peripheral sparsely populated regions in the European Union and in Norway. Nordregio Report 2006: 2. 183 p.
17. GoodNIP (2003). Good practices in Nordic innovation policies. Part 3. Nordic innovation policy measures, documents and government structures. STEP, Oslo. . 8.6.2005.
18. Gregersen B & B Johnson (1997). Learning economies, innovation systems and European integration. Regional Studies 31: 5, 479-490.
19. Hassink R (2005). How to unlock regional economis from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies 13: 4, 521-535.
20. Jauhiainen JS (2006). Multipolis: high-technology network in northern Finland. European Planning Studies 14: 10, 1407-1428.
21. Jauhiainen JS (2007). Regional and innovation policies in Finland - Towards convergence and/or mismatch? Regional Studies 41 (in print).
22. Keeble D, J Offord & S Walker (1988). Peripheral regions in a community of twelve member states. 137 p. Commission of the European Community, Luxembourg.
23. Lorenzen M (2001). Localized learning and policy: academic advice on enhancing regional competitiveness through learning. European Planning Studies 9: 2, 163-185.
24. Lundvall B-Å & S Borrás (1997). The globalising learning economy: implications for innovation policy. 179 p. Commission of the European Community, Luxemburg.
25. Lundvall B-Å, B Johnso, ES Andersen & B Dalum (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy 31: 2, 213-231.
26. Lundvall B-Å & P Maskell (2000). Nation states and economic development: from national systems of production to national systems of knowledge creation and learning. In Clark GL, MP Feldmann & MS Gertler (eds). The oxford handbook of economic geography, 353-372. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. Mariussen Å (2004). Competitive advantages of national economies. Paper presented at Nordregio, April 2004.
28. Miettinen R (2002). National innovation system. Scientific concept or political rhetoric. 168 p. Edita, Helsinki.
29. Ministry of Education (2005). Education statistics. . 30.6.2005.
30. Morgan K (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography 4: 1, 3-21.
31. Morgan K & C Nauwelaers; (1999). A regional perspective on innovation: from theory to strategy. In Morgan K & C Nauwelaers (eds). Regional innovation strategies. The challenge for less-favoured regions, 1-18. Regional Studies Association, Norwich.
32. Nelson RR (1993). A retrospective. In Nelson RR (ed). National innovation systems. A comparative analysis, 505-525. Oxford University Press, New York.
33. Northern periphery programme 2007-2013 (2007). . 3.10.2007.
34. Oughton C, M Landbaso & K Morgan (2002). The regional innovation paradox: innovation policy and industrial policy. Journal of Technology Transfer 27: 1, 97-110.
35. Rosenfeld SA (2002). Creating smart systems. A guide to cluster strategies in less favoured regions. European Union-Regional Innovation Strategies. . 14.2.2007.
36. Sotarauta M & S Srnivas (2005). The co-evolution of policy and economic development: a discussion on innovative regions. MIT IPC Local Innovation Systems Working Paper 05-001. 48 p.
37. Spiekermann K & J Neubauer (2002). European accessibility and peripherality: concepts, models and indicators. Nordregio Working Paper 2002: 9. 46 p.
38. Spiekermann K & H Aalbu (2004). Nordic peripherality in Europe. Nordregio Working Paper 2004: 2. 38 p.
39. Statistics Finland (2006). Statfin. . 20.12.2006.
40. Statistics Norway (2006). Statistical yearbook of Norway 2005. . 29.12.2006
41. Statistics Sweden (2006). Statistical yearbook of Sweden 2005. 781 p. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm.
42. Tödtling F & M Trippl (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34, 1203-1219.
43. Tuomi J & A Sarajärvi (2002). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. 158 p. Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, Helsinki.
44. White MD & EE Marsh (2006). Content analysis: a flexible methodology. Library Trends 55: 1, 22-45.