Complementarity endures: No firewall for an infalling observer

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Nomura, Yasunori ^a,b   Varela, Jaime ^a,b   Weinberg, Sean J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Black Holes in String Theory; Models of Quantum Gravity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876206618     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2013)059     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. W.K. Wootters and W.H. Zurek, A single quantum cannot be cloned, Nature 299 (1982) 802 [INSPIRE].
2. L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306069] [INSPIRE].
3. C.R. Stephens, G. 't Hooft and B.F. Whiting, Black hole evaporation without information loss, Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 621 [gr-qc/9310006] [INSPIRE]. (Pubitemid 24768561)
4. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025] [INSPIRE].
5. L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius, Gedanken experiments involving black holes, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 966 [hep-th/9308100] [INSPIRE].
6. T. Banks and W. Fischler, M theory observables for cosmological space-times, hep-th/0102077 [INSPIRE].
7. L. Dyson, J. Lindesay and L. Susskind, Is there really a de Sitter/CFT duality?, JHEP 08 (2002) 045 [hep-th/0202163] [INSPIRE].
8. L. Susskind, Twenty years of debate with Stephen, hep-th/0204027 [INSPIRE].
9. Y. Nomura, Physical theories, eternal inflation and quantum universe, JHEP 11 (2011) 063 [arXiv:1104.2324] [INSPIRE].
10. Y. Nomura, Quantum mechanics, spacetime locality and gravity, arXiv:1110.4630 [INSPIRE].
11. Y. Nomura, The static quantum multiverse, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083505 [arXiv:1205.5550] [INSPIRE].
12. A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?, JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1207.3123] [INSPIRE].
13. L. Susskind, Complementarity and firewalls, arXiv:1207.4090.
14. R. Bousso, Complementarity is not enough, arXiv:1207.5192 [INSPIRE].
15. Y. Nomura and J. Varela, A note on (no) firewalls: the entropy argument, arXiv:1211.7033 [INSPIRE].
16. D.N. Page, Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306083] [INSPIRE].
17. H. Ollivier, D. Poulin and W.H. Zurek, Objective properties from subjective quantum states: environment as a witness, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 220401 [quant-ph/0307229]. (Pubitemid 40072774)
18. R. Blume-Kohout and W.H. Zurek, Quantum Darwinism: entanglement, branches and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 062310 [quant-ph/0505031].
19. G. 't Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, gr-qc/9310026 [INSPIRE].
20. L. Susskind, The world as a hologram, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089] [INSPIRE].
21. R. Bousso, A covariant entropy conjecture, JHEP 07 (1999) 004 [hep-th/9905177] [INSPIRE].
22. Y. Nomura, J. Varela and S.J. Weinberg, work in progress.
23. R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner, The dynamics of general relativity, in Gravitation: an introduction to current research, L. Witten ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York U.S.A. (1962) [gr-qc/0405109] [INSPIRE].
24. D.N. Page, Is black hole evaporation predictable?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 301 [INSPIRE].
25. D. Harlow, Complementarity, not firewalls, arXiv:1207.6243.