Biochemically and topographically engineered poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels with biomimetic characteristics as substrates for human corneal epithelial cells

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 101 A, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1184-1194

  Yanez Soto B ^a   Liliensiek, S J ^a   Murphy, C J ^b,c   Nealey, P F ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomimetic material; Epithelial cell; Hydrogel; Nanotopography; Polyethylene glycol

Indexed keywords

BASEMENT MEMBRANE; BIOMEDICAL IMPLANTS; CHEMICAL ATTRIBUTES; EPITHELIAL CELLS; HUMAN CORNEAL EPITHELIAL CELLS; LATERAL DIMENSION; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL DIACRYLATE;

ALIGNMENT; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; BIOMIMETICS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; CONTRAST MEDIA; PEPTIDES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

HYDROGELS;

INTEGRIN; MACROGOL; POLY(ETHYLENE GLYCOL) DIACRYLATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CELL; CORNEA EPITHELIUM CELL; EPITHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN CELL CULTURE; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IN VIVO STUDY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELLS, CULTURED; EPITHELIAL CELLS; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; OLIGOPEPTIDES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

EID: 84876160952     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34412     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Corneal blindness: A global perspective. Bull World Health Org 2001;79:214-221.
2. Hicks CR, Fitton JH, Chirila TV, Crawford GJ, Constable IJ. Keratoprostheses: Advancing toward a true artificial cornea. Survey Ophthalmol 1997;42:175-189.
3. Aiken-O'Neill P, Mannis MJ. Summary of corneal transplant activity: Eye Bank Association of America. Cornea 2002;21:1-3.
4. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials 1999;20:573-588.
5. Aquavella JV, Qian Y, McCormick GJ, Palakuru JR. Keratoprosthesis: Current techniques. Cornea 2006;25:656-662.
6. Abrams GA, Schaus SS, Goodman SL, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography of the corneal epithelial basement membrane and Descemet's membrane of the human. Cornea 2000;19: 57-64.
7. Karuri NW, Liliensiek S, Teixeira AI, Abrams G, Campbell S, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 2004;117 (Pt 15):3153-3164.
8. Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Bertics PJ, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J Cell Sci 2003;116 (Pt 10):1881-1892.
9. Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF. Cell behavior on lithographically defined nanostructured substrates. J Vacuum Sci Technol B: Microelectron Nanom Struct 2003;21:683-687.
10. Diehl KA, Foley JD, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;75:603-611.
11. Liliensiek SJ, Campbell S, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. The scale of substratum topographic features modulates proliferation of corneal epithelial cells and corneal fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;79:185-192.
12. Teixeira AI, McKie GA, Foley JD, Bertics PJ, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography. Biomaterials 2006;27:3945-3954.
13. Fraser SA, Ting YH, Mallon KS, Wendt AE, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF. Sub micron and nanoscale feature depth modulates alignment of stromal fibroblasts and corneal epithelial cells in serum rich and serum free media. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;86:725-735.
14. Tocce EJ, Smirnov VK, Kibalov DS, Liliensiek SJ, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF. The ability of corneal epithelial cells to recognize high aspect ratio nanostructures. Biomaterials 2010;31:4064-4072.
15. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials 1997;18:1573-1583.
16. Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 2001;101:1869-1880.
17. Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: Scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 2003;24: 4337-4351.
18. Perlin L, MacNeil S, Rimmer S. Production and performance of biomaterials containing RGD peptides. Soft Matter 2008;4: 2331-2349.
19. Metters AT, Anseth KS, Bowman CN. Fundamental studies of a novel, biodegradable PEG-b-PLA hydrogel. Polymer 2000;41: 3993-4004.
20. Mann BK, Gobin AS, Tsai AT, Schmedlen RH, West JL. Smooth muscle cell growth in photopolymerized hydrogels with cell adhesive and proteolytically degradable domains: Synthetic ECM analogs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2001;22:3045-3051.
21. Suh KY, Seong J, Khademhosseini A, Laibinis PE, Langer R. A simple soft lithographic route to fabrication of poly(ethylene glycol) microstructures for protein and cell patterning. Biomaterials 2004;25:557-563.
22. Revzin A, Russell RJ, Yadavalli VK, Koh WG, Deister C, Hile DD, Mellott MB, Pishko MV. Fabrication of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel microstructures using photolithography. Langmuir 2001; 17:5440-5447.
23. Ruoslahti E. RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. Annual review of cell and developmental biology 1996;12:697-715.
24. Lauweryns B vdOJ, Volpes R, Foets B, Missotten, L. Distribution of very late activation integrins in the human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:2079-2085.
25. Jain S, Azar DT. Extracellular matrix and growth factors in corneal wound healing. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1994;5:3-12.
26. Carter RT. The role of integrins in corneal wound healing. Veterinary Ophthalmol 2009;12:2-9.
27. Fong E, Tzlil S, Tirrell DA. Boundary crossing in epithelial wound healing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:19302-19307.
28. Lin CC, Metters AT. Metal-chelating affinity hydrogels for sustained protein release. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;83:954-964.
29. Xia Y, Whitesides GM. Soft lithography. Annu Rev Mater Sci 1998;28:153-184.
30. Allen-Hoffmann BL, Rheinwald JG. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mutagenesis of human epidermal keratinocytes in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81:7802-7806.
31. Sabatini LM, Allen-Hoffmann BL, Warner TF, Azen EA. Serial cultivation of epithelial cells from human and macaque salivary glands. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1991;27A:939-948.
32. Teixeira AI, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Responses of human keratocytes to micro and nanostructured substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;71:369-376.
33. Elbert DL, Hubbell JA. Conjugate addition reactions combined with free-radical cross-linking for the design of materials for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 2001;2:430-441.
34. Wilson M, Liliensiek SJ, Murphy CJ, Murphy WL, Nealey PF. Hydrogels with well-defined peptide-hydrogel spacing and concentration: Impact on epithelial cell behavior. Soft Matter 2012;8: 390-398.
35. Bray JC, Merrill EW. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels. Formation by electron beam irradiation of aqueous solutions and subsequent crystallization. J Appl Polym Sci 1973;17:3779-3794.
36. Park JH, Bae YH. Hydrogels based on poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(tetramethylene oxide) or poly(dimethyl siloxane): Synthesis, characterization, in vitro protein adsorption and platelet adhesion. Biomaterials 2002;23:1797-1808.
37. Nolan CM, Reyes CD, Debord JD, García AJ, Lyon LA. Phase transition behavior, protein adsorption, and cell adhesion resistance of poly(ethylene glycol) cross-linked microgel particles. Biomacromolecules 2005;6:2032-2039.
38. Lin-Gibson S, Jones RL, Washburn NR, Horkay F. Structure-property relationships of photopolymerizable poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate hydrogels. Macromolecules 2005;38:2897-2902.
39. Beamish JA, Zhu J, Kottke-Marchant K, Marchant RE. The effects of monoacrylated poly(ethylene glycol) on the properties of poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels used for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;92:441-450.
40. Kingshott P, Thissen H, Griesser HJ. Effects of cloud-point grafting, chain length, and density of PEG layers on competitive adsorption of ocular proteins. Biomaterials 2002;23:2043-2056.
41. Gombotz WR, Guanghui W, Horbett TA, Hoffman AS. Protein adsorption to poly(ethylene oxide) surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:1547-1562.
42. Mertz PM, Davis SC, Franzen L, Uchima FD, Pickett MP, Pierschbacher MD, Polarek JW. Effects of an arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide-containing artificial matrix on epithelial migration in vitro and experimental second-degree burn wound healing in vivo. J Burn Care Res 1996;17:199-206.
43. Chung IM, Enemchukwu NO, Khaja SD, Murthy N, Mantalaris A, García AJ. Bioadhesive hydrogel microenvironments to modulate epithelial morphogenesis. Biomaterials 2008;29:2637-2645.
44. von der Mark K, Park J, Bauer S, Schmuki P. Nanoscale engineering of biomimetic surfaces: Cues from the extracellular matrix. Cell Tissue Res 2010;339:131-153.
45. Stepp MA, Gibson HE, Gala PH, StaIglesia DD, Pajoohesh-Ganji A, Pal-Ghosh S, Brown M, Aquino C, Schwartz AM, Goldberger O. Defects in keratinocyte activation during wound healing in the syndecan-1-deficient mouse. J Cell Sci 2002;115:4517-4532.
46. Jones JCR. The 3 laminin subunit, 6 4 and 3 1 integrin coordinately regulate wound healing in cultured epithelial cells and in the skin. J Cell Sci 1999;112:2615-2629.