Clinical utility and interobserver agreement of autofluorescence imaging and magnification narrow-band imaging for the evaluation of Barrett's esophagus: A prospective tandem study

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 77, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 711-718

  Giacchino, Maria ^a   Bansal, Ajay ^a   Kim, Raymond E ^b   Singh, Vikas ^a   Hall, Sandy B ^a   Singh, Mandeep ^a   Rastogi, Amit ^a   Moloney, Brian ^a   Wani, Sachin B ^a   Gaddam, Srinivas ^a   Mathur, Sharad C ^a,c   Wallace, Michael B ^d   Kanakadandi, Vijay ^a   Balasubramanian, Gokulakrishnan ^a   Gupta, Neil ^a   Sharma, Prateek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

AFI; autofluorescence imaging; Barrett's esophagus; BE; CI; confidence interval; EAC; esophageal adenocarcinoma; HD WLE; HGD; high definition white light endoscopy; high grade dysplasia; IM; IND; indefinite for dysplasia; intestinal metaplasia; LGD; low grade dysplasia; narrow band imaging; NBI; negative predictive value; NPV; SD; SD WLE; standard deviation; standard definition white light endoscopy; white light endoscopy; WLE

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EARLY CANCER; ENDOSCOPE; ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS BIOPSY; ESOPHAGUS DYSPLASIA; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTESTINE METAPLASIA; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; NARROW BAND IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; BIOPSY; COLOR; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTICAL IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 84876153384     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. H. Pohl, H.G. Welch The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence J Natl Cancer Inst 97 2005 142 146 (Pubitemid 40277094)
2. M.A. Kara, F.P. Peters, F.J. Ten Kate Endoscopic video autofluorescence imaging may improve the detection of early neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus Gastrointest Endosc 61 2005 679 685 (Pubitemid 40603035)
3. M.A. Kara, F.P. Peters, P. Fockens Endoscopic video-autofluorescence imaging followed by narrow band imaging for detecting early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus Gastrointest Endosc 64 2006 176 185 (Pubitemid 44062483)
4. W.L. Curvers, R. Singh, L.M. Song Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system Gut 57 2008 167 172 (Pubitemid 351158041)
5. W.L. Curvers, L.A. Herrero, M.B. Wallace Endoscopic tri-modal imaging is more effective than standard endoscopy in identifying early-stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus Gastroenterology 139 2010 1106 1114
6. W.L. Curvers, F.G. van Vilsteren, L.C. Baak Endoscopic trimodal imaging versus standard video endoscopy for detection of early Barrett's neoplasia: a multicenter, randomized, crossover study in general practice Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 195 203
7. J. Boyer, R. Laugier, M. Chemali French Society of Digestive Endoscopy SFED guideline: monitoring of patients with Barrett's esophagus Endoscopy 39 2007 840 842 (Pubitemid 47386837)
8. P. Sharma, J. Dent, D. Armstrong The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett's esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria0 Gastroenterology 131 2006 1392 1399 (Pubitemid 44708937)
9. American Gastroenterological Association S.J. Spechler, P. Sharma, R.F. Souza et al. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett's esophagus Gastroenterology 140 2011 1084 1091
10. R.J. Schlemper, R.H. Riddell, Y. Kato The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia Gut 47 2000 251 255 (Pubitemid 30489769)
11. J.R. Landis, G.G. Koch The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 1977 159 174 (Pubitemid 8054849)
12. I. Waxman, V.J. Konda Endoscopic techniques for recognizing neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus: which should the clinician use? Curr Opin Gastroenterol 26 2010 352 360
13. W. Curvers, L. Baak, R. Kiesslich Chromoendoscopy and narrow-band imaging compared with high-resolution magnification endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus Gastroenterology 134 2008 670 679 (Pubitemid 351312734)
14. W.L. Curvers, C.J. Bohmer, R.C. Mallant-Hent Mucosal morphology in Barrett's esophagus: interobserver agreement and role of narrow band imaging Endoscopy 40 2008 799 805
15. L.A. Herrero, W.L. Curvers, A. Bansal Zooming in on Barrett oesophagus using narrow-band imaging: an international observer agreement study Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21 2009 1068 1075
16. W.L. Curvers, R. Singh, M.B. Wallace Identification of predictive factors for early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus after autofluorescence imaging: a stepwise multicenter structured assessment Gastrointest Endosc 70 2009 9 17
17. M. Singh, A. Bansal, W.L. Curvers Observer agreement in the assessment of narrowband imaging system surface patterns in Barrett's esophagus: a multicenter study Endoscopy 43 2011 745 751