Cross-sectional study examining salmonella enterica carriage in subiliac lymph nodes of cull and feedlot cattle at Harvest

Foodborne Pathogens and Disease

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 368-374

  Gragg, Sara E ^a   Loneragan, Guy H ^a   Brashears, Mindy M ^a   Arthur, Terrance M ^b   Bosilevac, Joseph M ^b   Kalchayanand, Norasak ^b   Wang, Rong ^b   Schmidt, John W ^b   Brooks, J Chance ^a   Shackelford, Steven D ^b   Wheeler, Tommy L ^b   Brown, Tyson R ^a   Edrington, Thomas S ^c   Brichta Harhay, Dayna M ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S MEAT ANIMAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c SOUTHERN PLAINS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOXICILLIN PLUS CLAVULANIC ACID; AMPICILLIN; CEFTIOFUR; CEFTRIAXONE; CHLORAMPHENICOL; STREPTOMYCIN; SULFAFURAZOLE; TETRACYCLINE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ARTICLE; AUTUMN; BACTERIUM CARRIER; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; CATTLE; FOOD CONTAMINATION; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HARVEST; LYMPH NODE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; SEASONAL VARIATION; SPRING; SUBILIAC LYMPH NODE; SUMMER; UNITED STATES; WINTER;

ANIMALS; CARRIER STATE; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DRUG RESISTANCE, MULTIPLE, BACTERIAL; LYMPH NODES; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; PHENOTYPE; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; SEASONS; SEROTYPING; UNITED STATES;

BOS; BOVINAE; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA ENTERICA;

EID: 84876149312     PISSN: 15353141     EISSN: 15567125     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1275     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. APHIS. Salmonella in United States feedlots. 2001. Available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal-health/nahms/feedlot/ downloads/feedlot99/ Feedlot99-is-Salmonella.pdf, accessed March 14, 2012.
2. Arthur TM, Brichta-Harhay DM, Bosilevac JM, et al. Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in bovine lymph nodes potentially destined for use in ground beef. J Food Prot 2008;71:1685-1688.
3. Barkocy-Gallagher GA, Arthur TM, Rivera-Betancourt M, et al. Seasonal prevalence of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, including O157:H7 and non-O157 serotypes, and Salmonella in commercial beef processing plants. J Food Prot 2003;66:1978-
4. Barkocy-Gallagher GA, Arthur TM, Siragusa GR, et al. Genotypic analyses of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and O157 nonmotile isolates recovered from beef cattle and carcasses at processing plants in the midwestern states of the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67:3810-3818.
5. Bosilevac JM, Guerini MN, Kalchayanand N, Koohmaraie M. Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in commercial ground beef in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:1892-1900.
6. Brichta-Harhay DM, Arthur TM, Bosilevac JM, et al. Microbiological analysis of bovine lymph nodes for the detection of Salmonella enterica. J Food Prot 2012;75:854-858.
7. Brichta-Harhay DM, Guerini MN, Arthur TM, et al. Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 contamination on hides and carcasses of cull cattle presented for slaughter in the United States: An evaluation of prevalence and bacterial loads by immunomagnetic separation and direct plating methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74:6289-6297.
8. [CDC] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Salmonella surveillance annual data summary, 2009. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011.
9. [CLSI] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twentieth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S20. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2010.
10. Edrington TS, Hume ME, Looper ML, et al. Variation in the faecal shedding of Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 in lactating dairy cattle and examination of Salmonella genotypes using pulsedfield gel electrophoresis. Lett Appl Microbiol 2004;38:366-372.
11. Farrow RL, Loneragan GH, Edrington TS, et al. Quantitative herd-level evaluation of the potential for a commercially available vaccine to effectively control Salmonella in dairy cattle. Annual Meeting of the Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases. Chicago, IL, 2009.
12. [FDA] Food and Drug Administration. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System- Enteric Bacteria (NARMS): 2009 Executive Report. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 2011.
13. Fluckey WM, Loneragan GH, Warner R, Brashears MM. Antimicrobial drug resistance of Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from cattle feces, hides, and carcasses. J Food Prot 2007;70:551-556.
14. [FSIS] Food Safety and Inspection Service. Serotypes profile of Salmonella isolates from meat and poultry products: January 1998 through December 2010. 2011. Available at: http://www .fsis.usda.gov/PDF/Serotypes- Profile-Salmonella-2010.pdf, accessed November 10, 2011.
15. FSIS. Microbiological results of raw ground beef products analyzed for Escherichia coli O157:H7, summarized by calendar year. 2012. Available at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/science/ Ground-Beef-E.Coli-Testing-Results/index.asp, accessed February 14, 2012. (Online)
16. Guo C, Hoekstra RM, Schroeder CM, et al. Application of bayesian techniques to model the burden of human salmonellosis attributable to U.S. food commodities at the point of processing: Adaptation of a Danish model. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2011;8:509-516.
17. Gupta A, Fontana J, Crowe C, et al. Emergence of multidrugresistant Salmonella enterica serotype Newport infections resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins in the United States. J Infect Dis 2003;188:1707-1716.
18. Herrera-León S, McQuiston JR, Usera MA, Fields PI, Garaizar J, Echeita MA. Multiplex PCR for distinguishing the most common phase-1 flagellar antigens of Salmonella spp. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:2581-2586.
19. Jones TF, Ingram LA, Cieslak PR, et al. Salmonellosis outcomes differ substantially by serotype. J Infect Dis 2008;198:109-114.
20. Kunze DJ, Loneragan GH, Platt TM, et al. Salmonella enterica burden in harvest-ready cattle populations from the southern high plains of the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74:345-351.
21. Loneragan GH, Brashears MM. Effects of using retention-pond water for dust abatement on performance of feedlot steers and carriage of Escherichia coli O157 and Salmonella spp. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226:1378-1383.
22. Loneragan GH, Thomson DU, McCarthy RM, et al. Salmonella diversity and burden in cows on and culled from dairy farms in the Texas high plains. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2012;9:1-7.
23. Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, et al. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:607-625.
24. Nucera DM, Maddox CW, Hoien-Dalen P, Weigel RM. Comparison of API 20E and invA PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica isolates from swine production units. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:3388-3390.
25. Rahn K, De Grandis SA, Clarke RC, et al. Amplification of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella. Mol Cell Probes 1992;6:271-279.
26. Rivera-Betancourt M, Shackelford SD, Arthur TM, et al. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella in two geographically distant commercial beef processing plants in the United States. J Food Prot 2004; 67:295-302.
27. Samuel JL, O'Boyle DA, Mathers WJ, Frost AJ. Isolation of Salmonella from mesenteric lymph nodes of healthy cattle at slaughter. Res Vet Sci 1980;28:238-241.
28. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States - major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:7-15.
29. Sorensen O, Van Donkersgoed J, McFall M, Manninen K, Gensler G, Ollis G. Salmonella spp. shedding by Alberta beef cattle and the detection of Salmonella spp. in ground beef. J Food Prot 2002;65:484-491.
30. Stevens MP, Humphrey TJ, Maskell DJ. Molecular insights into farm animal and zoonotic Salmonella infections. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009;364:2709-2723.