Heterospecific interactions and the proliferation of sexually dimorphic traits

Current Zoology

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 453-462

  Pfennig, Karin S ^a   Hurlbert, Allen H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Reinforcement; Reproductive character displacement; Sexual selection; Speciation; Species recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876145067     PISSN: 16745507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/58.3.453     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersson M, 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Badyaev AV, Hill GE, 2003. Avian sexual dichromatism in relation to phylogeny and ecology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34: 27-49.
3. Badyaev AV, Hill GE, Weckworth BV, 2002. Species divergence in sexually selected traits: Increase in song elaboration is related to decrease in plumage ornamentation in finches. Evolution 56: 412-419.
4. Bailey SF, 1978. Latitudinal gradients in colors and patterns of Passerine birds. Condor 80: 372-381.
5. Barraclough TG, Harvey PH, Nee S, 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in Passerine birds. Proceedings of The Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 259: 211-215.
6. Bolnick DI, Doebeli M, 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: Two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57: 2433-2449.
7. Butlin R, 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2: 8-13.
8. Butlin RK, Ritchie MG, 1994. Behaviour and speciation.In: Slater PJB, Halliday TR ed. Behaviour and Speciation. Cambridge: UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Candolin U, 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews 78: 575-595.
10. Chek AA, Bogart JP, Lougheed SC, 2003. Mating signal partitioning in multi-species assemblages: A null model test using frogs. Ecology Letters 6: 235-247.
11. Chesser RT, Banks RC, Barker FK, Cicero C, Dunn JL et al., 2010. Fifty-first supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-List of North American Birds. The Auk 127: 726-744.
12. Cooper IA, Gilman RT, Boughman JW, 2011. Sexual dimorphism and speciation on two ecological coins: Patterns from nature and theoretical predictions. Evolution 65: 2553-2571.
13. Coyne JA, Orr HA, 2004. Speciation. Sunderland MA: Sinauer.
14. Friedman NR, Hofmann CM, Kondo B, Omland KE, 2009. Correlated evolution of migration and sexual dichromatism in the New World orioles (Icterus). Evolution 63: 3269-3274.
15. Gerhardt HC, Huber F, 2002. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Grether GF, Losin N, Anderson CN, Okamoto K, 2009. The role of interspecific interference competition in character displacement and the evolution of competitor recognition. Biological Reviews 84: 617-635.
17. Hamilton TH, 1961. On the functions and causes of sexual dimorphism in breeding plumage characters of North American species of warblers and orioles. American Naturalist 95: 121-123.
18. Hebets EA, Papaj DR, 2005. Complex signal function: Developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57: 197-214.
19. Hofmann CM, Cronin TW, Omland KE, 2008. Evolution of sexual dichromatism. 1. Convergent losses of elaborate female coloration in New World orioles (Icterus spp.). Auk 125: 778- 789.
20. Howard DJ, 1993. Reinforcement: origin dynamics and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Harrison RG ed. Hybrid Zones and The Evolutionary Process. New York: Oxford University Press, 46-69.
21. Luther D, 2009. The influence of the acoustic community on songs of birds in a neotropical rain forest. Behavioral Ecology 20: 864-871.
22. Martin PR, Montgomerie R, Lougheed SC, 2010. Rapid sympatry explains greater color pattern divergence in high latitude birds. Evolution 64: 336-347.
23. McGill BJ, 2003. A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 422: 881-885.
24. McNaught MK, Owens IPF, 2002. Interspecific variation in plumage colour among birds: Species recognition or light environment? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 505-514.
25. Møller AP, Pomiankowski A, 1993. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32: 167-176.
26. Noor MAF, 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83: 503-508.
27. Pfennig KS, 1998. The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 265: 1743-1748.
28. Pfennig KS, Pfennig DW, 2009. Character displacement: Ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem. Quarterly Review of Biology 84: 253-276.
29. Price T, 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 353: 251-260.
30. Price T, 2008. Speciation in Birds. Greenwood Village CO: Roberts and Company Publishers.
31. Price T, Lovette IJ, Bermingham E, Gibbs HL, Richman AD, 2000. The imprint of history on communities of North American and Asian warblers. American Naturalist 156: 354-367.
32. Reeve HK, Pfennig DW, 2003. Genetic biases for showy males: Are some genetic systems especially conducive to sexual selection? Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 100: 1089-1094.
33. Ridgely RS, Allnutt TF, Brooks T, McNicol DK, Mehlman DW et al., 2007. Digital distribution maps of the birds of the Western Hemisphere version 3.0. Arlington Virginia USA: Nature- Serve.
34. Ritchie MG, 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 38: 79-102.
35. Rosenthal GG, Wagner WE, Ryan MJ, 2002. Secondary reduction of preference for the sword ornament in the pygmy swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Animal Behaviour 63: 37-45.
36. Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon JE, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ et al., 2010. The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis 1966-2009. Version 3.23.2011. Laurel, MD: USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.
37. Scott DK, Clutton-Brock TH, 1989. Mating systems parasites and plumage dimorphism in waterfowl. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26: 261-273.
38. Seddon NR, Merrill M, Tobias JA, 2008. Sexually selected traits predict patterns of species richness in a diverse clade of suboscine birds. American Naturalist 171: 620-631.
39. Servedio MR, Noor MAF, 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: Theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34: 339-364.
40. Shutler D, Weatherhead PJ, 1990. Targets of sexual selection: Song and plumage of wood warblers. Evolution 44: 1967- 1977.
41. White EP, Hurlbert AH, 2010. The combined influence of the local environment and regional enrichment on bird species richness. The American Naturalist 175: E35-E43.