Mate selection: Gender and generational differences

North American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 63-70

  Henry, Jermaine ^a   Helm, Herbert W ^a   Cruz, Natasha ^a  

^a ANDREWS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876141257     PISSN: 15277143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Amador, J., Charles, T., Tait, J., & Helm, H. W. Jr. (2005). Sex and generational differences in desired characteristics in mate selection. Psychological Reports. 96, 19-25. (Pubitemid 40405955)
2. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491-503.
3. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
4. Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1995). Men's and women's preferences in marital partners in the United States, Russia, and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(6),728-748.
5. th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
6. Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554-558.
7. Hoyt, L. L., & Hudson, J. W. (1981). Personal characteristics important in mate preferences among college students. Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 93-96.
8. Hudson, J. W., & Henze, L. F. (1969). Campus values in mate selection: A replication. Social Forces, 31, 772-775.
9. Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: The effects of endorsing the traditional female gender role. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 322-328.
10. McGinnis, R. (1958). Campus values in mate selection: A repeat study. Social Forces, 36, 368-373.
11. th IUSSP Conference, Marrakech, Morocco. Retrieved from http://iussp2009.princeton.edu/papers/91417
12. Scott, J. S. (1991). Sociodemographic differentials in mate selection preferences, Journal of Marriage and Family, 53(4), 928-940.
13. Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447-458. (Pubitemid 40815293)
14. U.S. Department of Commerce, United States Census Bureau. (2011). School enrollment: CPS October 2011 - detailed tables. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/school/data/cps/2011/tables.html