Researching scientific modeling: Language, the missing artifact

Emerging Methods in Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 141-182

  Amin, Tamer G ^a  

^a LEBANESE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876134041     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Al-Zahrani, A. 2008. Darwin's metaphors revisited: Conceptual metaphors, conceptual blends, and idealized cognitive models in the theory of evolution. Metaphor and Symbol 23: 50-82.
2. Amin, T. G. 2009. Conceptual metaphor meets conceptual change. Human Development 52, no. 3: 165-97.
3. Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577-609.
4. Bergen, B., N. Chang, and S. Narayan. 2004. Simulated action in an embodied construction grammar. Proceedings of the 26th meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75, no. 1: 1-28.
6. Brookes, D. T., and E. Etkina. 2007. Using conceptual metaphor and functional grammar to explore how language used in physics affects student learning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 3, no. 010105: 1-16.
7. Carlson, W. B., and M. E. Gorman. 1992. A cognitive framework to understand technological creativity: Bell, Edison, and the telephone. In Inventive minds: Creativity in technology, ed. R. J. Weber and D. N. Perkins, 48-79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Carruthers, P., S. Stich, and M. Siegal. 2002. The cognitive basis of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cartwright, N. 1999. The dappled world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Cheng, P. C.-H. 1999. Representational analysis and design: What makes an effective representation for learning probability theory. Technical Report No. 65. Center for Research and Development, Instruction and Training. University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
11. Clark, A. 1993. Associative engines: Connectionism, concepts and representational change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Clark, A. 1997. Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Clark, A. 1998. Magic words: How language augments human computation. In Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes, ed. P. Curruthers and J. Boucher, 162-83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Clement, J. 1994. Use of physical intuition and imagistic simulation in expert problem solving. In Implicit and explicit knowledge: An educational approach, Human development, vol. 6., ed. D. Tirosh, 204-44. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Craig, D. L., N. J. Nersessian, and R. Catrambone. 2002. Perceptual simulation in analogical problem-solving. In Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values. ed. L. Magnani and N. J. Nersessian, 167-90. New York, NY: Kluwer.
17. Dinsmore, J. 1991. Partitioned representations. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Dunbar, K. 1995. How scientists really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In The nature of insight, ed. R. Sternberg and J. Davidson, 365-95. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Dunbar, K. 2002. Understanding the role of cognition in science: The Science as Category framework. In The cognitive basis ofscience. ed. P. Carruthers, S. Stich and M. Siegal, 154-70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Fauconnier, G. 1990. Domains and connections. Cognitive Linguistics 1, no. 1: 151-74.
21. Fauconnier, G. 1996. Analogical counterfactuals. In Spaces, worlds and grammar, ed. G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser, 57-90. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22. Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Fauconnier, G. 2000. Methods and generalizations. In Scope and foundations of cognitive linguistics, ed. T. Janssen and G. Redeker, 95-128. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.
24. Fauconnier, G., and E. Sweetser. 1996. Spaces, worlds and grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25. Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 1996. Blending as a central process of grammar. In Conceptual structure, discourse and language, ed. A. Goldberg, 113-30. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 2002. The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
27. Fernandez-Duque, D., and M. L. Johnson. 1999. Attention metaphors: How metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention. Cognitive Science 23, no. 1: 83-116.
28. Fernandez-Duque, D., and M. L. Johnson. 2002. Cause and effect theories of attention: The role of conceptual metaphors. Review of General Psychology 6, no. 2: 153-65.
29. Fodor, J. A. 1975. The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Gentner, D. 1983. Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7: 155-70.
31. Gibbs, R. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Gibbs, R. W., and H. L. Colston. 1995. The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics 6, no. 4: 347-78.
33. Giere, R. N. 1988. Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
34. Giere, R. N. 1992. Cognitive models of science, Vol. XV, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
35. Giere, R. N. 2002a. Scientific cognition as distributed cognition. In The cognitive basis of science, ed. P. Curruthers, S. Stich, and M. Siegal, 285-99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Giere, R. N. 2002b. Models as parts of distributed cognitive systems. In Model based reasoning: Science, technology and values, ed. L. Magnani and N. Nersessian, 227-41. New York: Kluwer.
37. Giere, R. N. 2004. How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71: 742-52.
38. Giere, R. N., and B. Moffatt. 2003. Distributed cognition: Where the cognitive and the social merge. Social Studies of Science 33, no. 2: 1-10.
39. Glenberg, A. M. 1997. What is memory for? Behavioral and Brains Sciences 20: 1-55.
40. Gooding, D. C. 1990. Experiment and the making of meaning: Human agency in scientific observation and experiment. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
41. Gooding, D. C. 1992. The procedural turn; or, why do thought experiments work? In Cognitive models of science, Vol. XV, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, ed. R. N. Giere, 45-76. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42. Gooding, D. C. 2004. Cognition, construction, and culture: Visual theories in the sciences. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4: 551-93.
43. Gooding, D. C. 2006. From phenomenology to field theory: Faraday's visual reasoning. Perspectives on Science 14, no. 1: 40-65.
44. Gorman, M. E. 1992. Simulating science: Heuristics, mental models and techno-scientific thinking. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
45. Gorman, M. E. 1997. Mind in the world: Cognition and practice in the invention of the telephone. Social Studies of Science 27, no. 4: 583-624.
46. Greeno, J. G. 1989. Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. In Complex information processing, ed. D. Klahr and K. Kotovsky, 285-318. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Halliday, M. A. K. 1993a. Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, ed. M. A. K. Halliday and J. Martin, 69-85. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
48. Halliday, M. A. K. 1993b. On the language of physical science. In Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, ed. M. A. K. Halliday and J. Martin, 54-68. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
49. Halliday, M. A. K., and J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
50. Hegarty, M. 1992. Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 18, no. 4: 1084-102.
51. Hegarty, M. 2004. Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations between internal and external visualizations. In Diagrammatic representation and inference, ed. A. Blackwell, K. Mariott, and A. Shimojima, 1-13. Berlin: Springer.
52. Holton, G., and S. G. Brush. 2001. Physics, the human adventure: From Copernicus to Einstein and beyond. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
53. Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Ippolito, M. F., and R. D. Tweney. 1995. The inception of insight. In The nature of insight, ed. R. Sternberg and J. Davidson, 433-62 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56. Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983. Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Johnson-Laird, P. N. 2002. Pierce, logic diagrams, and the elementary operations of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 8: 69-95.
58. Kosslyn, S. M. 1994. Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60. Kuhn, T. S. 1964. The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61. Kurz-Milcke, E., N. J. Nersessian, and W. Newstetter. 2004. What has history got to do with cognition? Interactive methods for studying research laboratories. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4: 663-700.
62. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63. Lakoff, G. 1990. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1, no. 1: 39-74.
64. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65. Lakoff, G., and M. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.
66. Lakoff, G., and R. E. Núñez. 2000. Where mathematics comes from. New York: Basic Books.
67. Lakoff, G., and M. Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68. Langacker, R. 1986. An introduction to cognitive grammar. Cognitive Science 10: 1-40.
69. Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
70. Langacker, R. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
71. Larkin, J. H., and H. A. Simon. 1987. Why a diagram is sometimes worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11: 65-100.
72. Lave, J. 1988. Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Longino, H. E. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
74. Magnani, L., N. J. Nersessian, and P. Thagard, eds. 1999. Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery. New York, NY: Kluwer.
75. Nersessian, N. J. 1992. How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, ed. R. Giere, 3-45. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
76. Nersessian, N. J. 1993. In the theoretician's laboratory: Thought experimenting as mental modeling. In Proceedings of the 1992 biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, ed. D. Hull, M. Forbes, and K. Okruhlik, vol. 2, 291-301. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
77. Nersessian, N. J. 2006. The cognitive-cultural systems of the research laboratory. Organization Studies 27, no. 1: 125-45.
78. Nersessian, N. J. 2008a. Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Nersessian, N. J. 2008b. Mental modeling in conceptual change. In International handbook of research on conceptual change. ed. S. Vosniadou, 391-416. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
80. Norman, D. A. 1983. Some observations on mental models. In Mental models, ed. D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens, 7-15. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
81. Norton, J. 1991. Thought experiments in Einstein's work. In Thought experiments in science and philosophy, ed. T. Horowitz and G. J. Massey, 129-48. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
82. Perrig, W., and W. Kintsch. 1985. Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language 24: 503-18.
83. Reddy, M. 1979/1993. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Metaphor and thought, ed. A. Ortony, 2nd ed., 164-201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Rogoff, B. 1990. Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
85. Rumelhart, D. E., P. Smolensky, J. L. McClelland, and G. Hinton. 1986. Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models, ed. J. L. Mclelland and D. E. Rumelhart, 7-57. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86. Shepard, R. N. 1994. Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1: 2-28.
87. Stenning, K., and O. Lemon. 2001. Aligning logical and psychological perspectives on diagrammatic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review 15, nos. 1/2: 29-62.
88. Sweetser, E., and G. Fauconnier. 1996. Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of mental space theory. In Spaces, worlds and grammar, ed. G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser, 1-28. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
89. Turner, M., and G. Fauconnier. 1995. Conceptual integration and formal expression. Journal of Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10, no. 3: 183-204.
90. Tweney, R. D. 1985. Faraday's discovery of induction: A cognitive approach. In Faraday rediscovered: Essays on the life and work of Michael Faraday, 1791-1867, ed. D. Gooding and F. A. J. L. James, 189-210. New York, NY: Stockton Press.
91. Tweney, R. D. 1992. Inventing the field: Michael Faraday and the creative engineering of electromagnetic field theory. In Inventive minds: Creativity in technology, ed. D. Perkins and R. Weber, 31-47. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
92. Tweney, R. D. 1996. Presymbolic processes in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal 9, nos. 2-3: 163-72.
93. Tweney, R. D. 2002. Epistemic artifacts: Michael Faraday's search for the optical effects of gold. In Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values, ed. L. Magnani and N. J. Nersessian, 287-304. New York, NY: Kluwer.
94. Tweney, R. D. 2004. Replication and the experimental ethnography of science. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4: 731-58.
95. Tweney, R. D. 2006. Discovering discovery: How Faraday found the first metallic colloid. Perspectives on Science 14, no. 1: 97-121.
96. Valsiner, J. 1987. Culture and the development of children's action. Chichester: Wiley.
97. Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, ed. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
98. Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and language, ed. A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99. Wertsch, J. V. 1991. Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100. Wilson, N. L., and R. W. Gibbs. 2007. Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 31: 721-31.