Comparison between magnetic anchoring and guidance system camera-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and conventional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in a porcine model: Focus on ergonomics and workload profiles

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 490-496

  Han, Woong Kyu ^a,b   Tan, Yung K ^a   Olweny, Ephrem O ^a   Yin, Gang ^a   Liu, Zhuo Wei ^a   Faddegon, Stephen ^a   Scott, Daniel J ^a   Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERGONOMICS; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPE; LIKERT SCALE; MAGNETIC ANCHORING AND GUIDANCE SYSTEM CAMERA; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION TASK LOAD INDEX QUESTIONNAIRE; NEPHRECTOMY; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGEON; SURGICAL ERROR; SUTURE ANCHOR; TROCAR; WORKLOAD;

ANIMALS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; LAPAROSCOPY; MAGNETICS; MODELS, ANIMAL; NEPHRECTOMY; PHYSICIANS; SUS SCROFA; TIME FACTORS; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84876133582     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0484     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kommu SS, Kaouk JH, Rané A. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: Preliminary advances in renal surgery. BJU Int 2009;103:1034-1037
2. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: A comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol 2009;55: 1198-1204
3. Jeon HG, Jeong W, Oh CK, et al. Initial experience with 50 laparoendoscopic single site surgeries using a homemade, single port device at a single center. J Urol 2010;183:1866-
4. White MA, Haber G, Autorino R, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. BJU Int 2010;106:923-927
5. Lee JW, Arkoncel FRP, Rha KH, et al. Urologic robotassisted laparoendoscopic single site surgery using a homemade single-port device: A single-center experience of 68 cases. J Endourol 2011;25:1481-1485
6. Olweny EO, Park SK, Tan YK, et al. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty. Eur Urol 2012;61:410-414
7. Cadeddu J, Fernandez R, Desai M, et al. Novel magnetically guided intra-abdominal camera to facilitate laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: Initial human experience. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1894-1899
8. Raman J, Bergs R, Fernandez R, et al. Complete transvaginal NOTES nephrectomy using magnetically anchored instrumentation. J Endourol 2009;23:367-371
9. Zeltser I, Bergs R, Fernandez R, et al. Single trocar laparoscopic nephrectomy using magnetic anchoring and guidance system in the porcine model. J Urol 2007;178:288
10. Dominguez G, Durand L, De Rosa J, et al. Retraction and triangulation with neodymium magnetic forceps for singleport laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2009;23: 1661-1666
11. Leroy J, Cahill RA, Asakuma M, et al. Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg 2009;144: 173-179
12. Park S, Bergs R, Eberhart R, et al. Trocarless laparoscopy: Magnetic positioning of intraabdominal camera and retractor. Ann Surg 2007;245:379-384
13. Best SL, Bergs R, Scott DJ, et al. Solo surgeon laparoendoscopic single site nephrectomy facilitated by new generation magnetically anchored and guided systems camera. J Endourol 2012;26:214-218
14. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N, eds. Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988, pp. 139-183
15. Kelley WE. The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990's. JSLS 2008;12: 351-357
16. Nezhat C. When will video-assisted and robotic-assisted endoscopy replace almost all open surgeries? J Min Invas Gynecol 2012;19:238-243
17. Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: Worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 2011;60:998-1005
18. Cao A, Chintamani KK, Pandya AK, et al. NASA TLX: Software for assessing subjective mental workload. Behav Res Methods 2009;41:113-117
19. Arain NA, Cadeddu JA, Best SL, et al. A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, magnetically anchored, and flexible endoscopic cameras in performance and workload between laparoscopic and single-incision surgery. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:1170-1180
20. Best SL, Kabbani W, Scott DJ, et al. Magnetic anchoring andguidance system instrumentation for laparoendoscopicsingle- site surgery/natural orifice transluminal endoscopicsurgery: Lack of histologic damage after prolonged magneticcoupling across the abdominal wall. Urology 2011;77:243-247
21. Best SL, Bergs R, Gedeon M, et al. Maximizing couplingstrength of magnetically anchored surgical instruments: How thick can we gö Surg Endosc 2011;25:153-159