A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, magnetically anchored, and flexible endoscopic cameras in performance and workload between laparoscopic and single-incision surgery

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1170-1180

  Arain, Nabeel A ^a   Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ^a   Best, Sara L ^a   Roshek, Thomas ^a   Chang, Victoria ^a   Hogg, Deborah C ^a   Bergs, Richard ^b   Fernandez, Raul ^b   Webb, Erin M ^a   Scott, Daniel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Camera systems; Magnetic anchoring and guidance system; MAGS; SILS; Single incision laparoscopic surgery; Single site laparoscopic surgery; SSL; Surgeon performance; Workload

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EX VIVO STUDY; FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPIC CAMERA; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAGNETICALLY ANCHORED CAMERA; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE SITE LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; SUTURING METHOD; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; VALIDATION STUDY; WORKLOAD; ANIMAL; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EDUCATION; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; INSTRUMENTATION; LAPAROSCOPE; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SWINE;

ANIMALS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; ENDOSCOPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPES; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SUS SCROFA; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84863224732     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2013-6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Gervaz P, Inan I, Perneger T, Schiffer E, Morel P (2010) A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Ann Surg 252:3-8
2. Asencio F, Aguilo J, Peiro S, Carbo J, Ferri R, Caro F, Ahmad M (2009) Open randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 23:1441-1448
3. Hutter MM, Randall S, Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Abbott WM, Warshaw AL (2006) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 243:657-662 discussion 662-656
4. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001546
5. Kapischke M, Caliebe A, Tepel J, Schulz T, Hedderich J (2006) Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review. Surg Endosc 20:1060-1068
6. Calland JF, Tanaka K, Foley E, Bovbjerg VE, Markey DW, Blome S, Minasi JS, Hanks JB, Moore MM, Young JS, Jones RS, Schirmer BD, Adams RB (2001) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 233:704-715
7. Oltmann SC, Rivas H, Varela E, Goova MT, Scott DJ (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: case report of SILS adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:362-364
8. Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24:1403-1412
9. Podolsky ER, Curcillo PG II (2010) Single-port-access (SPA) surgery: a 24-month experience. J Gastrointest Surg 14:759-767
10. Horgan S, Cullen JP, Talamini MA, Mintz Y, Ferreres A, Jacobsen GR, Sandler B, Bosia J, Savides T, Easter DW, Savu MK, Ramamoorthy SL, Whitcomb E, Agarwal S, Lukacz E, Dominguez G, Ferraina P (2009) Natural orifice surgery: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 23:1512-1518
11. Nau P, Ellison CE, Muscarella P, Mikami D, Narula VK, Needleman B, Melvin WS, Hazey JW (2010) A review of 130 humans enrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1369-3
12. Gill IS, Cherullo EE, Meraney AM, Borsuk F, Murphy DP, Falcone T (2002) Vaginal extraction of the intact specimen following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 167:238-241
13. Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M, Caddedu J, Canes D, Curcillo PG II, Desai MM, Evanko JC, Falcone T, Fazio V, Gettman M, Gumbs AA, Haber GP, Kaouk JH, Kim F, King SA, Ponsky J, Remzi F, Rivas H, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Schauer P, Sotelo R, Speranza J, Sweeney J, Teixeira J (2010) Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc 24:762-768
14. Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20:329-333
15. Castellvi AO, Islam A, Tesfay ST, Castellvi AD, Wright AS, Scott, DJ (2010) Surgeon impressions and technical difficulty associated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS): a SAGES learning center study. Surg Endosc 24(10):2453-2457
16. Park S, Bergs RA, Eberhart R, Baker L, Fernandez R, Cadeddu JA (2007) Trocar-less instrumentation for laparoscopy: magnetic positioning of intraabdominal camera and retractor. Ann Surg 245:379-384
17. Zeltser IS, Bergs R, Fernandez R, Baker L, Eberhart R, Cadeddu JA (2007) Single-trocar laparoscopic nephrectomy using magnetic anchoring and guidance system in the porcine model. J Urol 78:288-291
18. Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Goova MT, Zeltser I, Kehdy FJ, Cadeddu JA (2007) Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21:2308-2316
19. Raman JD, Scott DJ, Cadeddu JA (2009) Role of magnetic anchors during laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and NOTES. J Endourol 23:781-786
20. Mashaud L, Eisenstein E, Caban A, Cadeddu J, Best S, Hogg D, Beardsley H, Paramo J, Fernandez R, Scott D (2010) Magnetic cautery dissector suitablity for traditional or single site laparoscopic cholecystectomy in human cadaver models. UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
21. Cadeddu J, Fernandez R, Desai M, Bergs R, Tracy C, Tang SJ, Rao P, Desai M, Scott D (2009) Novel magnetically guided intraabdominal camera to facilitate laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial human experience. Surg Endosc 23:1894-1899
22. Chang V, Tang SJ, Swain PC, Bergs R, Paramo J, Hogg DC, Fernandez R, Cadeddu JA, Scott DJ (2010) A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, flexible endoscopic, and wired and wireless magnetic NOTES cameras on ex vivo and in vivo surgical performance. Gastrointest Endosc 67:AB115
23. Schwaitzberg SD (xxxx) Imaging systems in minimally invasive surgery. In: Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL, Eubanks WS (eds) Master of endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery. 2nd ed. Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 118-129
24. Kondraske GV, Hamilton EC, Fischer CA, Scott DJ, Tesfay ST, Taneja R, Brown RJ, Jones DB (2002) Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control. Surg Endosc 16:1523-1527
25. Kornodorffer JR Jr, Hayes DJ, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Touchard CL, Markert RJ et al (2005) Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator. Surg Endosc 2:161-167
26. Hart SG, Staveland LE (1987) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. Elsevier, Amsterdam
27. Wickens CD, Hollands JG (2000) Engineering psychology and human performance, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
28. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518-525 discussion 25-28
29. Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115-120
30. Scott DJ, Ritter EM, Tesfay ST, Pimentel EA, Nagji A, Fried GM (2008) Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training. Surg Endosc 22:1887-1893
31. Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ (2005) Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 210:23-29
32. Swanstrom L, Swain P, Denk P (2009) Development and validation of a new generation of flexible endoscope for NOTES. Surg Innov 16:104-110
33. Berci G, Schwaitzberg SD (2002) The importance of understanding the basics of imaging in the era of high-tech endoscopy: part II. Logic, reality, and utopia. Surg Endosc 16:1518-1522
34. Gould JC, Frydman J (2007) Reverse-alignment surgical skills assessment. Surg Endosc 21:669-671
35. Conrad J, Shah AH, Divino CM, Schluender B, Gurland B, Shlasko E, Szold A (2006) The role of mental rotation and memory scanning on the performance of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 20:504-510
36. Emam TA, Hanna G, Cuschieri A (2002) Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Surg Endosc 16:267-271
37. Dunnican WJ, Singh TP, Ata A, Bendana EE, Conlee TD, Dolce CJ, Ramakrishnan R (2010) Reverse alignment "mirror image" visualization as a laparoscopic training tool improves task performance. Surg Innov 17:108-113
38. Binenbaum SJ, Teixeira JA, Forrester GJ, Harvey EJ, Afthinos J, Kim GJ, Koshy N, McGinty J, Belsley SJ, Todd GJ (2009) Single- incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope. Arch Surg 144:734-738