Spatial capture-recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity

Ecology

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 287-294

  Royle, J Andrew ^a   Chandler, Richard B ^a   Gazenski, Kimberly D ^a   Graves, Tabitha A ^b,c  

^a PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c and Department of Statistics   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal movement; Ecological distance; Landscape connectivity; Least cost path; Resistance surface; Spatial capture recapture

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; ESTIMATION METHOD; LANDSCAPE; MOVEMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION SIZE; PROBABILITY; SIMULATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; POPULATION DENSITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; POPULATION DENSITY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84876132814     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/12-0413.1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adriaensen, F., J. P. Chardon, G. De Blust, E. Swinnen, S. Villalba, H. Gulinck, and E. Matthysen. 2003. The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning 64:233-247.
2. Beier, P., D. R. Majka, and W. D. Spencer. 2008. Forks in the road: Choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conservation Biology 22:836-851.
3. Borchers, D. L., and M. G. Efford. 2008. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 64:377-385.
4. Cushman, S. A., B. W. Compton, and K. McGarigal. 2010. Habitat fragmentation effects depend on complex interactions between population size and dispersal ability: Modeling influences of roads, agriculture and residential development across a range of life-history characteristics. Pages 369-385 in S. A. Cushman and F. Huettmann, editors. Spatial complexity, informatics, and wildlife conservation. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
5. Cushman, S. A., K. S. McKelvey, J. Hayden, and M. K. Schwartz. 2006. Gene flow in complex landscapes: Testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. American Naturalist 168:486-499.
6. Efford, M. 2004. Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106:598-610.
7. Efford, M. G., D. K. Dawson, and D. L. Borchers. 2009. Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array. Ecology 90:2676-2682.
8. Epps, C. W., P. J. Palsbøll, J. D. Wehausen, G. K. Roderick, R. R. Ramey II, and D. R. McCullough. 2005. Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic diversity of desert bighorn sheep. Ecology Letters 8:1029-1038.
9. Fortin, D., H. L. Beyer, M. S. Boyce, D. W. Smith, T. Duchesne, and J. S. Mao. 2005. Wolves influence elk movements: Behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 86:1320-1330.
10. Foster, R. J., and B. J. Harmsen. 2012. A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data. Journal of Wildlife Management 76:224-236.
11. Fujiwara, M., K. Anderson, M. Neubert, and H. Caswell. 2006. On the estimation of dispersal kernels from individual markrecapture data. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 13:183-197.
12. Gardner, B., J. Reppucci, M. Lucherini, and J. Royle. 2010a. Spatially explicit inference for open populations: Estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies. Ecology 91:3376-3383.
13. Gardner, B., J. A. Royle, M. T. Wegan, R. E. Rainbolt, and P. D. Curtis. 2010b. Estimating black bear density using DNA data from hair snares. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:318-325.
14. Gerlach, G., and K. Musolf. 2000. Fragmentation of landscape as a cause for genetic subdivision in bank voles. Conservation Biology 14:1066-1074.
15. Gopalaswamy, A. M., J. A. Royle, M. Delampady, J. D. Nichols, K. U. Karanth, and D. W. Macdonald. 2012. Density estimation in tiger populations: Combining information for strong inference. Ecology 93:1741-1751.
16. Kendall, W., and J. Nichols. 2004. On the estimation of dispersal and movement of birds. Condor 106:720-731.
17. Kery, M., B. Gardner, T. Stoeckle, D. Weber, and J. A. Royle. 2010. Use of spatial capture-recapture modeling and DNA data to estimate densities of elusive animals. Conservation Biology 25:356-364.
18. McRae, B. H. 2006. Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60:1551-1561.
19. McRae, B. H., and P. Beier. 2007. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:19885.
20. Otis, D. L., K. P. Burnham, G. C. White, and D. R. Anderson. 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62:3-135.
21. Ovaskainen, O., H. Rekola, E. Meyke, and E. Arjas. 2008. Bayesian methods for analyzing movements in heterogeneous landscapes from mark-recapture data. Ecology 89:542-554.
22. Royle, J. A., and R. M. Dorazio. 2008. Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology: The analysis of data from populations, metapopulations and communities. Academic Press, London, UK.
23. Royle, J. A., K. U. Karanth, A. M. Gopalaswamy, and N. S. Kumar. 2009. Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models. Ecology 90:3233-3244.
24. Royle, J. A., and K. V. Young. 2008. A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data. Ecology 89:2281-2289.
25. Schwartz, M. K., J. P. Copeland, N. J. Anderson, J. R. Squires, R. M. Inman, K. S. McKelvey, K. L. Pilgrim, L. P. Waits, and S. A. Cushman. 2009. Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. Ecology 90:3222-3232.
26. Shirk, A. J., D. O. Wallin, S. A. Cushman, C. G. Rice, and K. I. Warheit. 2010. Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: A new model selection framework. Molecular Ecology 19:3603-3619.
27. Spear, S. F., N. Balkenhol, M. J. Fortin, B. H. Mcrae, and K. Scribner. 2010. Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: Considerations for parameterization and analysis. Molecular Ecology 19: 3576-3591.
28. Tischendorf, L., and L. Fahrig. 2000. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7-19.
29. Tischendorf, L., A. Grez, T. Zaviezo, and L. Fahrig. 2005. Mechanisms affecting population density in fragmented habitat. Ecology and Society 10:7.
30. Tracy, J. A. 2006. Individual-based movement modeling as a tool for conserving connectivity. Pages 343-368 in K. R. Crooks and M. Sanjayan, editors. Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
31. van Etten, J. 2011. R package gdistance: Distances and routes on geographical grids 1.1-2. http://www.icesi.edu.co/CRAN/web/packages/gdistance/ vignettes/gdistance-vignette.pdf
32. Wikle, C. K. 2003. Hierarchical Bayesian models for predicting the spread of ecological processes. Ecology 84:1382-1394.
33. With, K., and T. Crist. 1995. Critical thresholds in species' responses to landscape structure. Ecology 95:2446-2459.
34. Woods, J. G., D. Paetkau, D. Lewis, B. N. McLellan, M. Proctor, and C. Strobeck. 1999. Genetic tagging of freeranging black and brown bears. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:616-627.
35. Zeller, K., K. McGarigal, and A. Whiteley. 2012. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: A review. Landscape Ecology 27:777-797.