Nonequilibrium dynamics of arbitrary-range Ising models with decoherence: An exact analytic solution

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Foss Feig, Michael ^a   Hazzard, Kaden R A ^a   Bollinger, John J ^b   Rey, Ana Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARBITRARY COUPLINGS; ARBITRARY DIMENSION; EXACT ANALYTIC SOLUTIONS; MANY-BODY SYSTEMS; MEAN-FIELD LEVEL; NON-EQUILIBRIUM DYNAMICS; QUANTUM INFORMATION; SOLID-STATE SYSTEM;

EXPERIMENTS; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT; QUANTUM OPTICS; TRAPPED IONS;

ISING MODEL;

EID: 84876119636     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.042101     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. S. Diehl, E. Rico, M. Baranov, and P. Zoller, Nature Phys. 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys2106 7, 971 (2011).
2. E. Dalla Torre, E. Demler, T. Giamarchi, and E. Altman, Nature Phys. 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys1754 6, 802 (2010).
3. T. E. Lee, H. Häffner, and M. C. Cross, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.023602 108, 023602 (2012).
4. B. Kraus, H. P. Büchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042307 78, 042307 (2008).
5. S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. Büchler, and P. Zoller, Nature Phys. 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys1073 4, 878 (2008).
6. M. Foss-Feig, A. J. Daley, J. K. Thompson, and A. M. Rey, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.230501 109, 230501 (2012).
7. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885 80, 885 (2008).
8. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865 81, 865 (2009).
9. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Nat. Photonics 1749-4885 10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 5, 222 (2011).
10. J. W. Britton, B. C. Sawyer, A. C. Keith, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, H. Uys, M. J. Biercuk, and J. J. Bollinger, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature10981 484, 489 (2012).
11. K. Kim, M.-S. Chang, S. Korenblit, R. Islam, E. Edwards, J. Freericks, G.-D. Lin, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature09071 465, 590 (2010).
12. R. Islam, E. Edwards, K. Kim, S. Korenblit, C. Noh, H. Carmichael, G.-D. Lin, L.-M. Duan, C.-C. Joseph Wang, J. Freericks, Nat. Commun. 2041-1723 10.1038/ncomms1374 2, 377 (2011).
13. K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M. H. G. de Miranda, A. Pe'er, B. Neyenhuis, J. J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. S. Julienne, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1163861 322, 231 (2008).
14. A. V. Gorshkov, S. R. Manmana, G. Chen, J. Ye, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and A. M. Rey, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.115301 107, 115301 (2011).
15. H. Weimer, M. Müller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller, and H. P. Büchler, Nature Phys. 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys1614 6, 382 (2010).
16. R. Löw, H. Weimer, U. Krohn, R. Heidemann, V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, H. P. Büchler, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.033422 80, 033422 (2009).
17. S. Gopalakrishnan, B. L. Lev, and P. M. Goldbart, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.277201 107, 277201 (2011).
18. P. Strack and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.277202 107, 277202 (2011).
19. M. D. Swallows, M. Bishof, Y. Lin, S. Blatt, M. J. Martin, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1196442 331, 1043 (2011).
20. I. Chiorescu, Y. Nakamura, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1081045 299, 1869 (2003). (Pubitemid 36356651)
21. R. Hanson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, J. R. Petta, S. Tarucha, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.1217 79, 1217 (2007). (Pubitemid 47534150)
22. S. Prawer and A. D. Greentree, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1158340 320, 1601 (2008). (Pubitemid 351934250)
23. M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.5138 47, 5138 (1993).
24. A. Sorensen, L.-M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35051038 409, 63 (2001). (Pubitemid 32098622)
25. C. Gross, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature08919 464, 1165 (2010).
26. K. Mølmer and A. Sørensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1835 82, 1835 (1999).
27. T. Monz, P. Schindler, J. T. Barreiro, M. Chwalla, D. Nigg, W. A. Coish, M. Harlander, W. Hänsel, M. Hennrich, and R. Blatt, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.130506 106, 130506 (2011).
28. D. Leibfried, E. Knill, S. Seidelin, J. Britton, R. B. Blakestad, J. Chiaverini, D. B. Hume, W. M. Itano, J. D. Jost, C. Langer, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature04251 438, 639 (2005). (Pubitemid 41740569)
29. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188 86, 5188 (2001). (Pubitemid 32527770)
30. This master equation could be slightly generalized by allowing the decoherence rates to vary from site to site. This can be taken into account trivially by adding site indices to these rates in the final expressions, Eqs..
31. M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.101 70, 101 (1998). (Pubitemid 128022010)
32. H. Uys, M. J. Biercuk, A. P. VanDevender, C. Ospelkaus, D. Meiser, R. Ozeri, and J. J. Bollinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.200401 105, 200401 (2010).
33. G. G. Emch, J. Math. Phys. JMAPAQ 0022-2488 10.1063/1.1705023 7, 1198 (1966).
34. C. Radin, J. Math. Phys. JMAPAQ 0022-2488 10.1063/1.1665079 11, 2945 (1970).
35. M. Kastner, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106. 130601 106, 130601 (2011).
36. K. R. A. Hazzard, S. Manmana, M. Foss-Feig, and A. M. Rey, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.075301 110, 075301 (2013).
37. K. R. A. Hazzard, S. Manmana, M. Foss-Feig, and A. M. Rey (in preparation).
38. / 2), justifying the designation of Γ as the total decay rate, as in.
39. In Ref., α ≠0.1 is possible.
40. M. van den Worm, R. Paskauskas, B. Sawyer, J. Bollinger, and M. Kastner, arXiv: 1209.3697.