An empirical comparison of travel choice models that capture preferences for compromise alternatives

Transportation

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 549-562

  Chorus, Caspar G ^a   Bierlaire, Michel ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Compromise alternatives; Contextual concavity; Random regret; Route choices

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

COMPROMISE ALTERNATIVES; CONTEXTUAL CONCAVITY; EMPIRICAL - COMPARISONS; PREDICTIVE ABILITIES; RANDOM REGRET; REGRET MINIMIZATION; ROUTE CHOICE; TRAVEL CHOICE MODELS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

DATA SET; DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; MODELING; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84876095671     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-012-9444-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ben-Akiva, M. E., Swait, J.: The Akaike likelihood ratio index. Transp. Sci. 20(2), 133-136 (1986).
2. Bierlaire, M., 2003. BIOGEME: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. in: Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
3. Bierlaire, M.: An introduction to BIOGEME Version 1. 7, biogeme. epfl. ch (2008).
4. ChoiceMetrics,: Ngene 1. 0 user manual and reference guide Sydney, Australia (2009).
5. Chorus, C. G.: A new model of random regret minimization. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastructure Res. 10(2), 181-196 (2010).
6. Chorus, C. G., Rose, J. M.: Selecting a date: a matter of regret and compromises. In: Hess, S., Daly, A. (eds.) Choice modelling: The state of the art and the state of practice, Chap. 11. Edward Elgar (2011).
7. Chorus, C. G.: Random regret minimization: an overview of model properties and empirical evidence. Transp. Rev. 32(1), 75-92 (2012a).
8. Chorus, C. G.: Regret theory-based route choices and traffic equilibria. Transportmetrica 8(4), 291-305 (2012b).
9. Fonzone, A., Schmöcker, J-D., Ma, J. S., Fukuda, D.: Link based route choice considering risk aversion and regret. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC USA (2012).
10. Hensher, D. A., Greene, W., Chorus, C. G., in press. Random regret minimisation or random utility maximisation: an exploratory analysis in the context of automobile fuel choice. J. Adv. Transp.
11. Kivetz, R., Netzer, O., Srinivasan, V.: Alternative models for capturing the compromise effect. J. Mark. Res. 41, 237-257 (2004).
12. Müller, H., Kroll, E. B., Vogt, B.: Fact or artifact? Empirical evidence on the robustness of compromise effects in binding and non-binding choice contexts. J. Retail Consumer Serv. 17(5), 441-448 (2010).
13. Simonson, I.: Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. 19, 158-174 (1989).
14. Street, D. J., Burgess, L., Louviere, J. J.: Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. Int. J. Res. Mark. 22, 459-470 (2005).
15. Thiene, M., Boeri, M., Chorus, C. G.: Random regret minimization: exploration of a new choice model for environmental and resource economics. Environ. Resour. Econ. 51(3), 413-429 (2012).
16. Wernerfelt, B.: A rational reconstruction of the compromise effect: using market data to infer utilities. J. Consumer Res. 21(4), 627-633 (1995).